Author Topic: Big Ron says....Th-th-th-that's all folks! (Read 5868 times)

knny187 · « **on:** October 06, 2006, 05:29:48 PM »

Is it really over for big Ron?

bigmikecox · « **Reply #1 on:** October 06, 2006, 05:41:34 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on October 06, 2006, 05:35:47 PM

As I said, he wasn't off at the Olympia this year and he should just stick with that form. Unless Jay comes in ON as can be, he won't be able to take out that version of Ronnie. Instead it looks like Ronnie replicated his 2002 GNC form. $:-\$

Ronnie WAS off. You don't lose the Olympia as the defending champ if you are on. Jay caught him sleeping and came in with some crazy condition. The pics of Ronnie from 3-5 days out were impressive. He was drier than he was onstage. He is going to have to come in like 2003 to win again. Once you get that title the judges have a hard time voting for anyone else

jmt1 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 06, 2006, 05:46:22 PM »

yes ronnie was clearly off at the olympia...that was jays only chance of winning and he took advantage of that.

ronnie will be back for the o next year.

Miss Karen · « **Reply #3 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:00:25 PM »

If that is right what about Jay beating him this European weekend?

.

slayer · « **Reply #4 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:06:33 PM »

not only is ronald a sore loser, his fans are to lol

knny187 · « **Reply #5 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:11:21 PM »

Quote from: slayer on October 06, 2006, 06:06:33 PM

not only is ronald a sore loser, his fans are to lol

thats funny

lololoz

Marty Champions · « **Reply #6 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:15:25 PM »

i think ronnie has more character now with the torn lat and the left arm much smaller, hes like an old beaten warrior!!!!!

Marty Champions · « **Reply #7 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:21:31 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on October 06, 2006, 06:16:41 PM

Dude, are you bitter?

no thats my signature...im going to change it

Marty Champions · « **Reply #8 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:23:51 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on October 06, 2006, 06:16:41 PM

Dude, are you bitter?

so matt c, what exactly are you an expert in?

getfast81 · « **Reply #9 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:25:10 PM »

He was off, end of story. His abs were filled with water and so was his back. His arms and quads are such strong points they take away from the fact that his back was way off, his right lat had something weird going on with it, and from the front he was holding a layer of water.

jmt1 · « **Reply #10 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:26:13 PM »

not taking anything from jay but ronnie was off period.

when ronnie is at his best he is in a class by himself.

just look at his back double bi and rear lat spread these are shots he usually owns.

Marty Champions · « **Reply #11 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:26:57 PM »

who cares if he was off some on condition he killed everyone on arms, they are the most important bodybuilding muscles

knny187 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:27:14 PM »

Quote from: getfast81 on October 06, 2006, 06:25:10 PM

He was off, end of story. His abs were filled with water and so was his back. His arms and quads are such strong points they take away from the fact that his back was way off, his right lat had something weird going on with it, and from the front he was holding a layer of water.

more or less.......what you're saying is.....

Weightpit · « **Reply #13 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:28:01 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on October 06, 2006, 06:00:51 PM

Mike, you consider this to be off?

A little off...but THIS is off!!

Weightpit · « **Reply #14 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:30:20 PM »

ANd This....

jmt1 · « **Reply #15 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:31:20 PM »

Quote from: daddywaddy on October 06, 2006, 06:26:57 PM

who cares if he was off some on condition he killed everyone on arms, they are the most important bodybuilding muscles

that may be true in daddywaddy world....but in the real world of competitve bodybuilding if your conditioning is off your gonna get beat...no matter how big your guns are.

Weightpit · « **Reply #16 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:35:27 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on October 06, 2006, 06:33:07 PM

Exactly! His showing TODAY was off. At the Olympia he simply wasn't as good as he could have been. But then again, when has he ever been? He still dialed it in just fine.

Matt...what the hell do you think happened to Ronnie's legs......they are nothing like they used to be.....

Rampage · « **Reply #17 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:42:36 PM »

Im gonna agreee wiiiith...Matt C

Ronnie wasnt that off guys.He looks awwesome from the front

The whole thing is that he just isnt the same from the back......*THATS ALLL* His lat spread and back double bi killed his chance.Jay is the only guy who beat him in those regards (back shots) Just look at Ronnie next to dexter in the back shots and you will see ronnie taking dexter out.If ronnie got the back , cutler aint got no title, damn straight

Weightpit · « **Reply #18 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:42:51 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on October 06, 2006, 06:38:53 PM

That I think is just an issue of him being off and holding excess water. I think his legs can be recovered. My concerns are his triceps and back. I'm not so sure he will be able to recover from them and get them back to his previous best since time isn't on his side.

Honestly, the guy doesn't look healthy to me......I think he pushed his body as far as it can go and now it's pushing back.

dearth · « **Reply #19 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:43:31 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on October 06, 2006, 06:33:07 PM

Exactly! His showing TODAY was off. At the Olympia he simply wasn't as good as he could have been. But then again, when has he ever been? He still dialed it in just fine.

Matt C,

you sound a little confused.
First you were adamant the ronnie was not off at the olympia
now you say he "simply wasn't as good as he could have been"

I think you're doing ronnie little justice, in fact you probably sound less
intelligent that he does himself.

ali23 · « **Reply #20 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:50:06 PM »

Quote from: daddywaddy on October 06, 2006, 06:23:51 PM

so matt c, what exactly are you an expert in?

hey are you that fucking homo that was on the online contest with the kissing poses, lmao!!

your a fag!

change your picture hahahah

jmt1 · « **Reply #21 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:50:41 PM »

what are u looking at?

his conditioning was OFF at the olympia.

do you see a difference in this shot of ronnie "on"

and the same shot at this years o.

Marty Champions · « **Reply #22 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:52:15 PM »

Quote from: ali23 on October 06, 2006, 06:50:06 PM

hey are you that fucking homo that was on the online contest with the kissing poses, lmao!!

your a fag!

change your picture hahahah

are you muhammad ali's 23 year old retarted beaten to a pulp offspring?

Rampage · « **Reply #23 on:** October 06, 2006, 06:54:14 PM »

Listen , however off ronnie may have been. he takes cutler from front...baaaack is another story , cutler ytakes that no question

Ill tell you whats confusing , people saying ronnie coleman can come into a contest with a torn everything , a distended whatever and still WIN

And these were pro`s making those statements

Rampage · « **Reply #24 on:** October 06, 2006, 07:00:24 PM »

I dont believe coleman can win any of the grand prix`s.He shou;dnt try , cos all the condition in theworld aint gnna hide the fact that his back is subpar now, he just lacks the ferocious back he once had.So i dont think its a question of conditioning.

He needs to go train and get his back to its usual crazy self.Coleman mayy win a GP if cutler isnt competing , cos he cant take the rest out with that subpar back, just not cutler