Author Topic: Weird. Ronnie was softer and smaller (Read 3639 times)

donrhummy · « **on:** October 07, 2006, 07:41:04 AM »

Ronnie looked smaller but ripped a few days out in those pics someone posted before the grand prix, but on stage somehow he'd softened up.

And his back is no longer blowing people away.

donrhummy · « **Reply #1 on:** October 07, 2006, 07:43:18 AM »

Ronnie looking smaller but not shredded.

body88 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 07, 2006, 07:45:38 AM »

Wll that is because all the pictures posted before these shots where him fully clothed with only his arms showing.

donrhummy · « **Reply #3 on:** October 07, 2006, 07:46:23 AM »

Forget the PDI, these guys got screwed. They're the real top 3.

LOL.

donrhummy · « **Reply #4 on:** October 07, 2006, 07:47:25 AM »

Quote from: body88 on October 07, 2006, 07:45:38 AM

Wll that is because all the pictures posted before these shots where him fully clothed with only his arms showing.

uh, ok, but compare just his arms and they're softer/smoother. So what's your point?

donrhummy · « **Reply #5 on:** October 07, 2006, 07:51:11 AM »

Hard to believe, but this is Ronnie COLEMAN's back!

Deadpool · « **Reply #6 on:** October 07, 2006, 07:52:07 AM »

you sound so sad, so cheated...

slayer · « **Reply #7 on:** October 07, 2006, 07:52:56 AM »

Quote from: donrhummy on October 07, 2006, 07:46:23 AM

Forget the PDI, these guys got screwed. They're the real top 3. LOL.

kinda of tuff for chick to get on the pdi after seeing this!

Rearden Metal · « **Reply #8 on:** October 07, 2006, 09:04:16 AM »

Quote from: donrhummy on October 07, 2006, 07:51:11 AM

Hard to believe, but this is Ronnie COLEMAN's back!

That really is astonishing. Wouldn't matter how sharp he was, he couldn't hide that.

Ex Coelis · « **Reply #9 on:** October 07, 2006, 09:04:47 AM »

shitty lighting - why can't every show be lit like the 99 British GP? It can't be difficult; just buy a dimmer switch . . .

Hulkster · « **Reply #10 on:** October 07, 2006, 09:09:16 AM »

2006

2003

1999

natural al · « **Reply #11 on:** October 07, 2006, 09:11:56 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 07, 2006, 09:09:16 AM

2006

2003

1999

excactly. Ron's been going downhill for years, he was fine in 99 but tried to take it to the next level and he's suffereing for it now.

BEAST 8692 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 07, 2006, 09:33:04 AM »

what's astonishing is that ruhl has better taper, more size, better proportion, freakier than both of them from the front and then he turns around and it's like...where the hell did it go?

just like dillet and nasser. what the hell is it with that?

why the fuk won't these guys get to work and get a fuking back

seriously, i don't get it.

SWOLETRAIN · « **Reply #13 on:** October 07, 2006, 09:35:38 AM »

Maybe he's sick or something. That usually doesn't happen unless you don't eat. Maybe loosing the O made him sink into a depression. Like a little girl, I bet he went home and cried. Then went to Outback to make it all better.

canadaphiliac · « **Reply #14 on:** October 07, 2006, 10:01:22 AM »

In that comparison, Jay looks worse than he did in 2003 too. Yet, he got the crown over people who actually made imrpovements, like Melvin.

Luv2Hurt · « **Reply #15 on:** October 07, 2006, 10:08:06 AM »

Maybe ron is maxed out, his body said "enough"! Looks that way to me, burning out.

Royalty · « **Reply #16 on:** October 07, 2006, 10:11:13 AM »

Quote from: canadaphiliac on October 07, 2006, 10:01:22 AM

In that comparison, Jay looks worse than he did in 2003 too. Yet, he got the crown over people who actually made imrpovements, like Melvin.

no way

jay was way better in 2006

Something that hulkster still doesnt get: you just cant take random pics from different shows with different angles, different lighting, different backrounds and make comparisons.

canadaphiliac · « **Reply #17 on:** October 07, 2006, 10:30:53 AM »

Mmm, I'll take your word for it, I'm just sayin' from those pictures in particular, both of them are fading. But would that really be so bad? It might be nice for bodybuilding to not be a freak show. We have carnivals for that.

Hulkster · « **Reply #18 on:** October 07, 2006, 10:43:13 AM »

Quote from: Royalty on October 07, 2006, 10:11:13 AM

no way

jay was way better in 2006

Something that hulkster still doesnt get: you just cant take random pics from different shows with different angles, different lighting, different backrounds and make comparisons.

and something royalty doesn't get: if you look like crap in the pictures, chances are you look like crap in person too:

Jay in 2006

Jay in 2001

as you can see, his abs and legs (check the sweep) were way better in 2001 - these are two of Jay's stongest parts and they suffered greatly in 2006

JimmyTheFish · « **Reply #19 on:** October 07, 2006, 10:45:11 AM »

Ruhl owns that stage period......... should've taken it

Ronnie = sympathy placing

Shockwave · « **Reply #20 on:** October 07, 2006, 10:47:42 AM »

Um... everyone else has said just the opposite... You CANNOT judge a BB comp from pics. You have to be there.

Quote from: Hulkster on October 07, 2006, 10:43:13 AM

and something royalty doesn't get: if you look like crap in the pictures, chances are you look like crap in person too:

as you can see, his abs and legs (check the sweep) were way better in 2001 - these are two of Jay's stongest parts and they suffered greatly in 2006

Hulkster · « **Reply #21 on:** October 07, 2006, 11:00:07 AM »

Quote from: Shockwave on October 07, 2006, 10:47:42 AM

Um... everyone else has said just the opposite... You CANNOT judge a BB comp from pics. You have to be there.

pics are much better than sitting behind a tall guy in the 43d row

pics have their usefullness in comparing physiques.

Shockwave · « **Reply #22 on:** October 07, 2006, 11:01:51 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 07, 2006, 11:00:07 AM

pics are much better than sitting behind a tall guy in the 43d row

pics have their usefullness in comparing physiques.

I won't argue that.

the shadow · « **Reply #23 on:** October 07, 2006, 11:03:59 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 07, 2006, 10:43:13 AM

and something royalty doesn't get: if you look like crap in the pictures, chances are you look like crap in person too:

Jay in 2006

Jay in 2001

as you can see, his abs and legs (check the sweep) were way better in 2001 - these are two of Jay's stongest parts and they suffered greatly in 2006

come on hulkster...jays look way better ronnie in that first pic..just stop licking colemans ass and accept the fact that jay was too good for ronnie

canadaphiliac · « **Reply #24 on:** October 07, 2006, 11:09:08 AM »

Jay may look better in the first pic, but Victor looks best, so what you're saying is he really should have won then?