Author Topic: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?  (Read 7005 times)

yangmian

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 41
Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« on: October 07, 2006, 10:00:53 PM »
u said that muscle lost or gained has little to do with the weight lifted.so am i wasting my time than training for strengh i always thought that all things being equal if a person strengh increaces than bigger muscles will b achieved but the strengh to size relationship varies from person 2 person

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: hey adonis
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2006, 11:04:06 PM »
u said that muscle lost or gained has little to do with the weight lifted.so am i wasting my time than training for strengh i always thought that all things being equal if a person strengh increaces than bigger muscles will b achieved but the strengh to size relationship varies from person 2 person

Correct.

You can make wonderful strength gains and not gain a pound.

Bodybuilders who posess the biggest muscles are not the strongest people.  There are plenty of people under 200 lbs outlifting IFBB pro bodybuilders on a daily basis.  If the statement that the bigger the muscle the stronger the person, this would not hold true one bit.


knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: hey adonis
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2006, 12:31:07 PM »


You can make wonderful strength gains and not gain a pound.



true but extremely unlikely.....especially if you're a human being

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: hey adonis
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2006, 12:33:02 PM »


true but extremely unlikely.....especially if you're a human being

Not at all.

Many Powerlifters and Olympic lifters want to RULE their respective weight classes.

So they train to get stronger without exceeding their weight limits.


knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: hey adonis
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2006, 01:49:01 PM »
Not at all.

Many Powerlifters and Olympic lifters want to RULE their respective weight classes.

So they train to get stronger without exceeding their weight limits.




& surprisingly....they're all small & skinny guys

yangmian

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 41
Re: hey adonis
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2006, 09:21:18 PM »
Correct.

You can make wonderful strength gains and not gain a pound.

Bodybuilders who posess the biggest muscles are not the strongest people.  There are plenty of people under 200 lbs outlifting IFBB pro bodybuilders on a daily basis.  If the statement that the bigger the muscle the stronger the person, this would not hold true one bit.

yes but if the larger but not as strong bodybiulder increases his strengh with out getting fat than he would grow the same as if the smaller but stronger bodybuilder increases his strengh than he will get bigger also

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2006, 09:32:03 PM »
Refer to these guidelines when training:

1-6 reps = Power

6-10 reps = Strength

10-15 reps = Hypertrophy

onlyme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Don't Fuck With Bears
Re: hey adonis
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2006, 10:19:46 PM »
Not at all.

Many Powerlifters and Olympic lifters want to RULE their respective weight classes.

So they train to get stronger without exceeding their weight limits.



The reason they don't exceed their weight is either they feel good at their weight or just don't want to have to gain weight.  In other words your theory is wrong about strength and weight.  Their is a reason why the heavier powerlifters lift more weight, its becasue they have more muscle and are heavier.  Why do you think lighter guys don't hold the records in heavier classes except in extreme cases.  You keep trying to say you can get strong and not gain a pound.  That is correct but the weight you lift would be very insignificant compared to someone who had gained muscle mass.  If two people who have never lifted a wight in their lives decided to lift and see who gets strongest, stay together train the same eat the same and always weigh the same their weights lifted won't be much different if at all.  Now take one of the guys have eat more protein and lift heavier weight he will not only be heavier he will be stronger.  I love your theories but 99% of wrong.

Yev33

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 927
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2006, 10:27:46 PM »
They purposely cut their calories, if they didn't they would still gain weight. If a person is naturally strong realtive to his bodyweight, it's to his advantage to stay at his current weight and try to only increase his strength.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #9 on: October 14, 2006, 05:48:48 AM »
Quote
1-6 reps = Power

6-10 reps = Strength

10-15 reps = Hypertrophy
6-12 reps is optimal for hypertrophy; below 6 is good for strength.

Power training has to do with incorporating speed/explosiveness into the equation.

Above 12 reps you're starting to skew between endurance & hypertrophy.

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #10 on: October 14, 2006, 06:34:56 AM »
6-12 reps is optimal for hypertrophy; below 6 is good for strength.

Power training has to do with incorporating speed/explosiveness into the equation.

Above 12 reps you're starting to skew between endurance & hypertrophy.

this is true about strength and power. people seem to confuse the meaning of power. maybe because of the term 'powerlifting'.

however, i don't think hypertrophy is that easy to quantify in rep numbers. too many variables (rep speed, cadence, leverage, etc). besides, i've seen guys and girls gain muscle by doing 1-2 rep training ie westside stuff.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2006, 06:40:53 AM »
Quote
i don't think hypertrophy is that easy to quantify in rep numbers. too many variables (rep speed, cadence, leverage, etc). besides, i've seen guys and girls gain muscle by doing 1-2 rep training ie westside stuff.
It's fair to generalize on 6-12 for growth, assuming standard cadence/training and 1 minute max. rest between sets, 1.5 minutes for squats.

People can grow on any program including low reps; not the same thing as being the most effective.

chris_mason

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3216
  • Owner AtLarge Nutrition
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #12 on: October 14, 2006, 06:59:54 AM »
Ok, now for the facts.

Individually speaking the bigger one's muscles the stronger they are.  Hypertrophy of the contractile elements of skeletal muscles is one adaptation to the stress imposed by lifting heavy loads.  One should therefore always strive to increase the load they can handle on a given moevement for a given number of reps.  There are other variables but load is an important one.

w

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2006, 07:01:56 AM »
Refer to these guidelines when training:

1-6 reps = Power

6-10 reps = Strength

10-15 reps = Hypertrophy
you forgot indurance 16+ reps

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2006, 07:03:30 AM »
6-12 reps is optimal for hypertrophy; below 6 is good for strength.

Power training has to do with incorporating speed/explosiveness into the equation.

Above 12 reps you're starting to skew between endurance & hypertrophy.
holy shit, pumpster i agree with you on this one.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2006, 07:43:47 AM »
Quote
There are other variables but load is an important one.
Very important, in combination with a few other things. Load using low reps and very long rests does not lead to maximum size.

Quote
you forgot indurance 16+ reps
No, that was the number previously discussed. Plus with any common sense you already know that it's just a continuum that gets more skewed at each end of the scale.

Quote
holy shit, pumpster i agree with you on this one.
You're learning. ;)

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #16 on: October 15, 2006, 07:08:37 AM »
pumpster, i disagree with your 6-12r 1-1.5min rest between sets for hypertrophy thing.

put it this way, how do you know that is the most effective prescription for mass? got any reasoning behind that rational?

i see too many monsters lifting the biggest weights they can (for reps) and then resting as long as they want to. they don't look at the watch. sometimes it may be over 10 minutes before they look at the weight again.


dav-bol

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 278
  • Sexbomb
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #17 on: October 15, 2006, 07:38:46 AM »
Ok, now for the facts.

Individually speaking the bigger one's muscles the stronger they are.  Hypertrophy of the contractile elements of skeletal muscles is one adaptation to the stress imposed by lifting heavy loads.  One should therefore always strive to increase the load they can handle on a given moevement for a given number of reps.  There are other variables but load is an important one.



Yes, increase the cross-sectional area of a muscle and you've increased it's strength on an individual basis.
However, there is not a linear relationship at all.
For instance if you increase a muscle size by 10%, that doesn't mean you will be 10% more strong.




pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #18 on: October 15, 2006, 07:49:25 AM »
Quote
i see too many monsters lifting the biggest weights they can (for reps) and then resting as long as they want to. they don't look at the watch. sometimes it may be over 10 minutes before they look at the weight again.
Your own sample doesn't take into account the facts that (1) they might be training differently and less efficiently after reaching a certain size (lazy, in other words, not serious trainers) and (2) genetic superiors can train any way they want and still gain, doesn't mean it's efficient.

Shorter rest times have long been known as one of the primary ways to overload the muscle; this has been established as a fundamental tenet of BB for decades. Some reduce the time to well below a minute, as espoused by the great trainer Vince Gironda as part of volume training. Others like Coleman do this by using supersets, trisets or giant sets, with little or no rest between multiple, consecutive sets, because of the overload on the muscles.

There are a couple of other advantages besides the most important one of increasing intensity. The pump is drastically better with shorter rest times, which is which is psychologically huge-resting long periods of time the pump is lost and isn't a factor, a big negative to most serious BBs.

Secondly, long periods of rest allow the body to cool down, which drastically increases injury potential.

Third, shorter rest times overload the muscle without increasing the amount of weight used, which can reduce the injury potential.

Forth, most top guys don't rest long periods of time between sets, for all of the above reasons.


chris_mason

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3216
  • Owner AtLarge Nutrition
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #19 on: October 15, 2006, 01:44:23 PM »
Very important, in combination with a few other things. Load using low reps and very long rests does not lead to maximum size.


Paul Anderson and Doug Hepburn might have to disagree with you on that one were they alive today. 

w

jem123

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 303
  • Getbig!
Re: hey adonis
« Reply #20 on: October 15, 2006, 05:22:09 PM »
Correct.

You can make wonderful strength gains and not gain a pound.

Bodybuilders who posess the biggest muscles are not the strongest people.  There are plenty of people under 200 lbs outlifting IFBB pro bodybuilders on a daily basis.  If the statement that the bigger the muscle the stronger the person, this would not hold true one bit.



TA, you are only partly correct when you say you can gain strength but no bodyweight. While it is possible in the cognitive stages of muscular development, the stronger you get the bigger your muscles become. If you keep getting stronger your muscles will get bigger ERGO you will put on bodyweight.

Weightlifters/bb/powerlifters often keep their weight down, as already pointed out in this thread by diet and cardio manipulation.

While BB who possess the biggest muscles may not be the strongest people (as strength relies on lots of other variables) they will be somewhere near the top.

A big muscle is a strong muscle. There is an irrefutable correlation between the two.

SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #21 on: October 15, 2006, 05:40:26 PM »
how many times must TA be proven wrong  before he is totally ignored?
Here comes the money shot

AVBG

  • Guest
Re: hey adonis
« Reply #22 on: October 15, 2006, 05:49:23 PM »
Correct.

You can make wonderful strength gains and not gain a pound.

Bodybuilders who posess the biggest muscles are not the strongest people.  There are plenty of people under 200 lbs outlifting IFBB pro bodybuilders on a daily basis.  If the statement that the bigger the muscle the stronger the person, this would not hold true one bit.



All lies

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #23 on: October 16, 2006, 04:41:09 AM »
Your own sample doesn't take into account the facts that (1) they might be training differently and less efficiently after reaching a certain size (lazy, in other words, not serious trainers) and (2) genetic superiors can train any way they want and still gain, doesn't mean it's efficient.

Shorter rest times have long been known as one of the primary ways to overload the muscle; this has been established as a fundamental tenet of BB for decades. Some reduce the time to well below a minute, as espoused by the great trainer Vince Gironda as part of volume training. Others like Coleman do this by using supersets, trisets or giant sets, with little or no rest between multiple, consecutive sets, because of the overload on the muscles.

There are a couple of other advantages besides the most important one of increasing intensity. The pump is drastically better with shorter rest times, which is which is psychologically huge-resting long periods of time the pump is lost and isn't a factor, a big negative to most serious BBs.

Secondly, long periods of rest allow the body to cool down, which drastically increases injury potential.

Third, shorter rest times overload the muscle without increasing the amount of weight used, which can reduce the injury potential.

Forth, most top guys don't rest long periods of time between sets, for all of the above reasons.



definitely a compelling argument and some very good points but i'm not convinced.

when ronnie is gaining mass he lifts big heavy weights and rests big between sets. i remember the most massive guys like jim quinn would take massive rests between sets whilst using massive weights, often going down to a couple of reps with a ridiculous amount of weight.

if you are on gear you can get a fair bit of size from capillary growth caused by the massive pump you get from volume training with little rest, but real cellular hypertrophy that lasts and doesn't deflate in a couple of weeks is built on training with the heaviest weights possible which you simply can't do when you're having 1 - 1.5min rests between sets.

a lot of the top guys who are genetic freaks whilst being on gear do lift lighter and have shorter breaks, but a natural guy doing exactly the same training style just looks like average joe. in fact when the top guy comes off the gear they look pretty damned average too.

someone like shawn ray had a brisk pace to his workouts but he was not one of the most massive bodybuilders. actually, i don't think he gained much size at all after he built his foundation in the 80's. he was more about refinement.

yates was a guy that you could actually see growing throughout his career and he rested big between sets (over 5 minutes).

i've never seen a single bodybuilder that put an honest all out effort with the heaviest weight he could for reps ie 500lb squats for 10 quality reps to failure be ready to do another set in 1.5 minutes, and if he did i would suggest that he probably should be using 550lbs min in his squats.

i do agree that a bigger muscle (all things being equal - and there are a heap) is a stronger muscle and, especially if you want lasting gains, you should always strive to train with heavier weights in good form.

you just can't do that with 1 minute breaks between sets.




pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Training for Strength regarding weights lifted?
« Reply #24 on: October 16, 2006, 07:02:31 AM »
Quote
you just can't do that with 1 minute breaks between sets.
It's not that black & white, doesn't make sense to you because you're focused on the wrong thing. Amount of weight used is only one of the variables that constitutes intensity, which is the central tenet. Intensity can be accomplished by shorter rests, heavier weights, post-failure intensity techniques, more sets, etc. Heavier weights is only one way to do it.

If only the amount of weight used was important there'd be a closer correlation between the strongest BBs and the biggest; Dillet's an example of the opposite. Yates used a combo of post-failure HIT and weight, so rest times weren't so important. Scott used supersets and trisets along with post-failure techniques & fairly short rest times.