I saw the pictures from the first grand-prix and I think he looked the best.
Coleman looked small when compared with Ruhl, the biceps, lats and shoulders. Cutler also looks small when compared with Ruhl.
Most bodybuilding fans whould like the biggest man too win, Ruhl was, without a doubt.
Am I wrong?
I must say that Coleman looked better than Cutler at the Dutch grand-prix, so he would be second at the Olympia.