Author Topic: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp  (Read 15807 times)

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2533
  • Getbig!
Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« on: October 09, 2006, 01:13:00 PM »
Gut in perfect control.

Havent seen his waist this slim in yonks

[img]

TDK

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2006, 01:18:10 PM »
I agree.  Abbew looks amazing too.  With some more size he could be up there.

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2533
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2006, 01:25:19 PM »
I hope this cutler nonsense stops soon or bodybuilding really risks making itself look like a fool.

Look at the clip of his back. Why is one side of his body waaaaayy bigger than the other.

And people say ronnie was punished at the O for a left to right assymmetry.

My question is then - why wasn't jay too?

Things that make you go hmmm.

[img]

adamthetrain

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 43
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2006, 01:27:45 PM »
I hope this cutler nonsense stops soon or bodybuilding really risks making itself look like a fool.

Look at the clip of his back. Why is one side of his body waaaaayy bigger than the other.

And people say ronnie was punished at the O for a left to right assymmetry.

My question is then - why wasn't jay too?

Things that make you go hmmm.

[img]
That back shot is not even close!  Jay CUNTLER is getting OWNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

unbatrainer

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2006, 01:29:16 PM »
ron hands down

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2533
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2006, 01:30:04 PM »
The judging has been farcical.

What are the powers to be trying to prove.

Cutler is kidding himself if he thinks he deserves any of these victories.


gmflex

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6979
  • The Empire lives...you rebel scum!!!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2006, 01:34:25 PM »
Jay Cutler ;)

legbreaker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2006, 01:39:35 PM »
haha, sarcasm, you obviously don't know BB because that back shot jay and the other guy are not even in the same league as Ronnie.  Like your name your probably just being sarcastic, because that is a joke.  Ronnie is the best BB and everyone knows it, including jay. 

M75

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 244
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2006, 01:42:52 PM »
Ronnie is winning in that back shot without a doubt.

sgt. d

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4681
  • Don't tase me bro
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2006, 01:49:29 PM »
The judges did it again >:(

Al-Gebra

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #10 on: October 09, 2006, 01:51:51 PM »
Ron won this show.  Even the Ronnie pole smokers here can admit Jay beat Ronnie at the other GP shows, but this wasn't one of them!

Judges: stop this shit!

yeah, wtf happened here?

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20489
  • Biscuit
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #11 on: October 09, 2006, 01:54:04 PM »
Jay is clearly 2nd and almost 3rd in that back comparison shot.
a

fathead

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2011
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #12 on: October 09, 2006, 01:59:27 PM »
I thought they threw out the rule that Mr Olympia doesn't lose onstage last week?  Ronnie should of won this show. i wanna see the scoresheets.

Rich2

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #13 on: October 09, 2006, 02:07:16 PM »
agreed, this is Ronnie's best showing of the year by far.

figgs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • from realization to infinity
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #14 on: October 09, 2006, 02:07:21 PM »
I thought Ronnie was being compared to 2 amateurs in that back shot! I can't believe that's Jay getting owned like a little bitch! Then what happened at the Olympia?  WTF?!
~

j3di3

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 470
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2006, 02:08:47 PM »
Ron won this show.  Even the Ronnie pole smokers here can admit Jay beat Ronnie at the other GP shows, but this wasn't one of them!

Judges: stop this shit!

QFT

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #16 on: October 09, 2006, 02:10:00 PM »
Coleman thickness crushes gutler

backday

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 758
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #17 on: October 09, 2006, 02:17:20 PM »
Yeah, he is even good from the front :)
2

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2533
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #18 on: October 09, 2006, 02:21:20 PM »
Maybe the most ridiculous judging decision seen in a long time.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 78891
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #19 on: October 09, 2006, 02:24:43 PM »
Maybe the most ridiculous judging decision seen in a long time.

No that was the 2001 Mr Olympia  ;)

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2533
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #20 on: October 09, 2006, 02:35:35 PM »
No that was the 2001 Mr Olympia  ;)

See either 94 or 97 Olympias.  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 78891
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #21 on: October 09, 2006, 02:39:05 PM »
See either 94 or 97 Olympias.  ;)

Neither were as close as 2001  ;) I agree Ronnie did look better at this contest than the others but Jay was simply better conditioned and more muscular .

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2533
  • Getbig!
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #22 on: October 09, 2006, 02:42:24 PM »
Wrong unfortunately.

Coleman 2001 - flat and depleted.

Yates 97 - aged, haggard, torn muscles every where, rapdily diminishing taper.

Factor in the fact that both nasser and ray of 97 were leaps and bounds ahead of cutler of 2001 and it becomes painfully clear that 97 was far more a debacle than 2001.


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 78891
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #23 on: October 09, 2006, 02:44:48 PM »
Wrong unfortunately.

Coleman 2001 - flat and depleted.

Yates 97 - aged, haggard, torn muscles every where, rapdily diminishing taper.

Factor in the fact that both nasser and ray of 97 were leaps and bounds ahead of cutler of 2001 and it becomes painfully clear that 97 was far more a debacle than 2001.



I'm sorry sport the judges gave Yates straight firsts in 1997 , the same judges gave Coleman just a 4 point edge in 2001 after losing both the muscularity & symmetry rounds , one of the most controversial Mr Olympia contests ever !  ;)

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: Coleman looked great at the dutch gp
« Reply #24 on: October 09, 2006, 02:46:06 PM »
"what goes around comes around, poetic justice"

-Kool Moe Dee
nasser=piece of shit