Author Topic: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...  (Read 8939 times)

Dorian 01

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 818
  • Ronnie Rockel > Ronnie Coleman
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #25 on: October 10, 2006, 08:56:51 AM »
Hmm...anyone else noticed Ronnie calves look really big and good in these pics?  :o
Yeah, sweet implants. Too bad he can't flex them.
T

body88

  • Guest
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #26 on: October 10, 2006, 09:12:09 AM »
A gay comment from a guy who keep saying "yes TA you look amazing ,you rock! do me hard"  ::)

Haha this could be the worst comeback ever seen.

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30279
  • Mentzer is Alive
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #27 on: October 10, 2006, 10:32:18 AM »


jay looks like he takes up more space than ronnie here. Ronnie let Jay catch up and pass him.

XXXII/LX

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
  • I have to return some video tapes.
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #28 on: October 10, 2006, 10:38:04 AM »
Jays arms are baby smooth. Ron's detail has him by a mile.

nder98

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1846
  • Getlaid!
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #29 on: October 10, 2006, 10:40:50 AM »
did you get fucked by some guys....i think they must have inserted some crack up your ass biatch

Nahhhh, I just usually get it despenced from your mama's rancid gaping twat :-*

nder98

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1846
  • Getlaid!
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #30 on: October 10, 2006, 10:42:29 AM »
Jays arms are baby smooth. Ron's detail has him by a mile.

Exactly, whoever doesn't think so, is more thank likely f*&king retarded...

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #31 on: October 10, 2006, 10:55:09 AM »
No, only your gay ass does

What was that for? You're pretty quick at calling racism on your ass but can't help to gay everybody out... pretty inconsistent..

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #32 on: October 10, 2006, 10:58:01 AM »
Another reminder of the uneven IFBB politics. This won, despite the fact the he along with Haney had one of the worst MMs ever. It's like a bad joke:

sinbad

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 621
  • Chest like Arnold!
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #33 on: October 10, 2006, 12:12:19 PM »
Wow, Coleman not winning is almost criminal. Bodybuilding took a wrong turn somewhere, and is now so far from the mainstream it will be hard to come back. These guys look amazing, but they look like chemical lab experiments, I would take a Sergio, Robinson, or even Haney over these guys. Cutlers win may be seen as a right step in the PR department, mainstream looks and Slightly less freakish looking. The influx of drugs into other sports has clearly not helped matters much for bodybuilding which rewards it's participants for massive drug use. Mass monsters appeal to a small hardcore population, but the money is with appeal to the mainstream audience. Any way I am preaching to the choir ;D

IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #34 on: October 10, 2006, 12:28:25 PM »
What was that for? You're pretty quick at calling racism on your ass but can't help to gay everybody out... pretty inconsistent..

He is a litle cry baby...they usualy act like that.

But its ok,by his pics we can clearly see he have down syndrom.

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #35 on: October 10, 2006, 12:52:09 PM »
Another reminder of the uneven IFBB politics. This won, despite the fact the he along with Haney had one of the worst MMs ever. It's like a bad joke:

so now the Mr. Olympia contest is decided on one pose - the most muscular pose.

just so happens that its one of dorian's worst poses and yet you keep bringing it up.

i dont see you posting pics of a side triceps or abs and thigh pose.  a

nd we wont even get into how coleman looked this year and how he got dominated by jay cutler (22-38) and even worse in the grand prix shows. 
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

stomper

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 198
  • Getbig!
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #36 on: October 10, 2006, 12:52:46 PM »
no offense to ronnie but by those pics jay beat the hell outta him

Naked4Jesus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1598
  • You can save a IFBB Pro today by donating a kidney
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #37 on: October 10, 2006, 12:54:44 PM »


jay looks like he takes up more space than ronnie here. Ronnie let Jay catch up and pass him.

Jay's closer to the camera in that pic and Ronnie is slightly behind.  If you've seen shots of them taken from a distance you'd see that Ronnie is much bigger than Jay at every angle. 

Naked4Jesus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1598
  • You can save a IFBB Pro today by donating a kidney
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #38 on: October 10, 2006, 12:57:27 PM »
See what I mean?


Naked4Jesus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1598
  • You can save a IFBB Pro today by donating a kidney
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #39 on: October 10, 2006, 01:00:50 PM »
Another example:




Alex23

  • Guest
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #40 on: October 11, 2006, 01:03:20 AM »
See what I mean?



Yep, you're right... but Jay's conditioning still slightly better..

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2537
  • Getbig!
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #41 on: October 11, 2006, 05:17:26 AM »
Yep, you're right... but Jay's conditioning still slightly better..

What gave that away?

Jays obvious edge on detail, sliced hamstrings and delineated lower back.

Think before you type

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #42 on: October 11, 2006, 07:27:31 AM »
Ronnie has Jay from the front upperbody. Jay has Ronnie from the back upperbody.
Jay has Ronnie on legs, period.

Jay wins IMO.

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #43 on: October 11, 2006, 08:57:00 AM »
What gave that away?
Jays obvious edge on detail, sliced hamstrings and delineated lower back.
Think before you type

Here we go...  ::)

nycbull

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5763
  • Team Jay Should Have Won
Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
« Reply #44 on: October 11, 2006, 09:19:15 AM »
Looks to me that Ronnie hasn't extended fully in the last picture and if so it's worthless to compare with

True, as are most photo comparison but most of your obsessive drolls will continue to compare still shots one after the other after the other until your eyeballs fall out. Its all mute unless the competitors are in the same exact stage of executing their pose, both inhaling or exhaling at the same point and under the standing under the same exact lighting conditions.

And any shot of two or more competitors at an angle is innaccurate as to which competitor is bigger, the one closest to the camera will always appear larger.

Stop the Insanity >:(