Author Topic: Google knows you very very very well.  (Read 3080 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Google knows you very very very well.
« on: October 12, 2006, 11:01:51 PM »
Woah...


1. Google's immortal cookie:
Google was the first search engine to use a cookie that expires in 2038. This was at a time when federal websites were prohibited from using persistent cookies altogether. Now it's years later, and immortal cookies are commonplace among search engines; Google set the standard because no one bothered to challenge them. This cookie places a unique ID number on your hard disk. Anytime you land on a Google page, you get a Google cookie if you don't already have one. If you have one, they read and record your unique ID number.

2. Google records everything they can:
For all searches they record the cookie ID, your Internet IP address, the time and date, your search terms, and your browser configuration. Increasingly, Google is customizing results based on your IP number. This is referred to in the industry as "IP delivery based on geolocation."

3. Google retains all data indefinitely:
Google has no data retention policies. There is evidence that they are able to easily access all the user information they collect and save.

4. Google won't say why they need this data:
Inquiries to Google about their privacy policies are ignored. When the New York Times (2002-11-28) asked Sergey Brin about whether Google ever gets subpoenaed for this information, he had no comment.

5. Google hires spooks:
Matt Cutts, a key Google engineer, used to work for the National Security Agency. Google wants to hire more people with security clearances, so that they can peddle their corporate assets to the spooks in Washington.

6. Google's toolbar is spyware:
With the advanced features enabled, Google's free toolbar for Explorer phones home with every page you surf, and yes, it reads your cookie too. Their privacy policy confesses this, but that's only because Alexa lost a class-action lawsuit when their toolbar did the same thing, and their privacy policy failed to explain this. Worse yet, Google's toolbar updates to new versions quietly, and without asking. This means that if you have the toolbar installed, Google essentially has complete access to your hard disk every time you connect to Google (which is many times a day). Most software vendors, and even Microsoft, ask if you'd like an updated version. But not Google. Any software that updates automatically presents a massive security risk.

7. Google's cache copy is illegal:
Judging from Ninth Circuit precedent on the application of U.S. copyright laws to the Internet, Google's cache copy appears to be illegal. The only way a webmaster can avoid having his site cached on Google is to put a "noarchive" meta in the header of every page on his site. Surfers like the cache, but webmasters don't. Many webmasters have deleted questionable material from their sites, only to discover later that the problem pages live merrily on in Google's cache. The cache copy should be "opt-in" for webmasters, not "opt-out."

8. Google is not your friend:
By now Google enjoys a 75 percent monopoly for all external referrals to most websites. Webmasters cannot avoid seeking Google's approval these days, assuming they want to increase traffic to their site. If they try to take advantage of some of the known weaknesses in Google's semi-secret algorithms, they may find themselves penalized by Google, and their traffic disappears. There are no detailed, published standards issued by Google, and there is no appeal process for penalized sites. Google is completely unaccountable. Most of the time Google doesn't even answer email from webmasters.

9. Google is a privacy time bomb:
With 200 million searches per day, most from outside the U.S., Google amounts to a privacy disaster waiting to happen. Those newly-commissioned data-mining bureaucrats in Washington can only dream about the sort of slick efficiency that Google has already achieved.

Bigger Business

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • FKN Gym Wear
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2006, 11:14:32 PM »
Ive never visited google...what are you talking about?

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2006, 12:53:23 AM »
240, why do you think Google need to have all this data?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2006, 12:59:36 AM »
240, why do you think Google need to have all this data?

Marketing purposes?

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5804
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2006, 01:23:04 AM »
so when 240 and his band of 911 freedom fighters go missing we know who to blame?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2006, 01:33:33 AM »
so when 240 and his band of 911 freedom fighters go missing we know who to blame?

Too many of us.  Early on, people were suicided, sadly.  Now there are many Americans who do 911 Truth for a living.  There are many that march frequently, hold movie screenings, pass out DVDs everyday, and dedicate their life to researching it.

It's growing.  South park had it on last night.  Oprah flirted with it today while discussing the White House lies.   

Tonight, O'Reilly called a former marine a traitor because this marine wanted a deeper investigation into the events of 9/11.  IMO, OReilly melting like this indicates it's not a lunacy theory, but something he seriously considers a threat.  And, he didn't want to talk about the evidence- he wanted to talk about why the media won't cover it.  With as many former CIA agents we've had bragging about the influence of govt in the media, it shouldn't come as a surprise that the NY Times wouldn't break the story (although many smaller papers do address it - and suddenly they turn into "liberal crap" when they've never been called this before)

And the fact is, the media is giving it more and more time because it IS going to come out.  Can you imagine putting out this theory 2 weeks after 9/11?  Never would happen.  But as more and more people in media, college, govt, LEO, and everyday joes.... every day more of them learn the official story is a lie.  Coverage is becoming more acceptable.

All I ask is that when you do come to the truth one day, when you sit down and watch Loose Change or 911 Power hour... when you finally see dozens of facts which make the official story impossible... if and when you find that day, please do one thing:

Tell a friend :)

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5804
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2006, 02:07:59 AM »
Too many of us.  Early on, people were suicided, sadly.  Now there are many Americans who do 911 Truth for a living.  There are many that march frequently, hold movie screenings, pass out DVDs everyday, and dedicate their life to researching it.

It's growing.  South park had it on last night.  Oprah flirted with it today while discussing the White House lies.   

Tonight, O'Reilly called a former marine a traitor because this marine wanted a deeper investigation into the events of 9/11.  IMO, OReilly melting like this indicates it's not a lunacy theory, but something he seriously considers a threat.  And, he didn't want to talk about the evidence- he wanted to talk about why the media won't cover it.  With as many former CIA agents we've had bragging about the influence of govt in the media, it shouldn't come as a surprise that the NY Times wouldn't break the story (although many smaller papers do address it - and suddenly they turn into "liberal crap" when they've never been called this before)

And the fact is, the media is giving it more and more time because it IS going to come out.  Can you imagine putting out this theory 2 weeks after 9/11?  Never would happen.  But as more and more people in media, college, govt, LEO, and everyday joes.... every day more of them learn the official story is a lie.  Coverage is becoming more acceptable.

All I ask is that when you do come to the truth one day, when you sit down and watch Loose Change or 911 Power hour... when you finally see dozens of facts which make the official story impossible... if and when you find that day, please do one thing:

Tell a friend :)
Where is my book report on the NIST document young man?


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2006, 06:34:15 AM »
Where is my book report on the NIST document young man?

White house ordered both the EPA and NIST reports.
White house changed the EPA report to meet its agenda - EPA whistleblowers revealed this.
Do ya really trust the integrity of the NIST report?

It's like if a kid turns in two pieces of homework and you find one is plagarized.

They changed the EPA report to get people back to work faster, and they were caught lying, because a scientist feeling people's lives were being endangered came fwd.  Just beacuse no NIST guys have come fwd yet, and no lives are in imminent risk from the paper... do ya really truth the paper's findings?  It's like the police report listing 'suicide' as the cause of death when the police chief's ex-wife turns up dead and he orders the report written.  HE gets to release it! lol...



We need an investigation done by worldwide experts, not US universities using federal grant $.  We need an investigation done by both supporters and critics- let them argue their evidence for the world to see.  jwb, there were pools of molten metal 50 foot deep there.  This doesn't happen from fire.   NIST said "There's a small chance that some melting can occur, but since that doesn't affect the fall, we're not going there.  But there were fires burning 3 months afterwards, after 3 months of hoses on it.  Only explosives does this man.

buffbodz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5533
  • It's only a board
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2006, 06:55:01 AM »
It keeps taking over my home page almost daily. >:(
6 meals lift heavy and 1/2 hr cardio

YoMamaBeenLurking

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2991
  • The Black Knight
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2006, 06:57:52 AM »
I thought this was thread was about Google, not 911?  Can we stop spinning EVERYTHING back to 911 please.  The Google topic happens to be a good one.
BKS - Guardian of Truth

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2006, 06:58:22 AM »
240, why do you think Google need to have all this data?

Google and Bush have joined forces..........It's a conspiracy :D!

YoMamaBeenLurking

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2991
  • The Black Knight
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2006, 07:05:46 AM »
"8. Google is not your friend:
By now Google enjoys a 75 percent monopoly for all external referrals to most websites. Webmasters cannot avoid seeking Google's approval these days, assuming they want to increase traffic to their site. If they try to take advantage of some of the known weaknesses in Google's semi-secret algorithms, they may find themselves penalized by Google, and their traffic disappears. There are no detailed, published standards issued by Google, and there is no appeal process for penalized sites. Google is completely unaccountable. Most of the time Google doesn't even answer email from webmasters."


This is so true.  If you have a site, negelecting to optimize and work towards a higher Google PR rank can leave you staring at a beautiful page with little to no visitors.  FYI I read yesterday about the hidden pitfalls of linking with every site under the sun however.  You can get your own score zapped if you knowingly or unknowingly link your site with what is reffered to as a link farm.   Usually it's a PR 0 site with nothing more than a ton of links.  If you link to too many of them, you could end up getting penalized...meaning your rank will be lowered and you will get less traffic.

Amazing how powerful Google has become.  If worked right you can make a nice piece of change, if worked wrong, you can sit and stare at all the work you've done, frustrated as hell that nobody is coming to check it out.
BKS - Guardian of Truth

a_joker10

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2006, 10:35:49 AM »
The whole internet reeks of privacy concerns.
These problems have around long before Mr. Bush though.

PGP issues with 128 bit encryption. The government knows how to crack it.
All conversations on phones are digital. These networks are tied back to main switches monitored by the government.
There is a reason why terrorists are using flash drives.

Have you ever read the agreements that you sign when you "LICENCE" software.

Almost all software is "tracked" and your user preferences logged.
Do you use a credit card or a saver card when you go shopping? All of your transactions are logged to your Social security number.

We chose to give away some of our freedoms for security. We gave away Independence for convenience.

What actually surprises me  is how little of this data is actually used. I mean they should be able to round up virtuvirtuallyly al criminal activity with the evesdropping and monitoring techniques they use.
But they don't. This website has huge list of Felons, every member that openly states they use Steroids or recreational drugs, but how many people have been arrested? None.
However if they did something bad and the government didn't have enough evidence to convict, do you think that some other charges based on what they have said here might come up?

See in the US your society is based on Life Liberty and the Prusuit of happiness.
In Canada, human rights, good governance and the rule of law
Z

Always Sore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8547
  • Catch it..Like herpes!
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2006, 11:18:41 AM »
Funny I used google to look up 240 and it comes back with a blank screen and says "THERE IS NO 240, WE ARE NOW WATCHING YOU..."   ;D

checkmate

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 173
  • Blaaargo Argo!
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2006, 12:24:53 PM »
1. Google's immortal cookie:
Google was the first search engine to use a cookie that expires in 2038. This was at a time when federal websites were prohibited from using persistent cookies altogether. Now it's years later, and immortal cookies are commonplace among search engines; Google set the standard because no one bothered to challenge them. This cookie places a unique ID number on your hard disk. Anytime you land on a Google page, you get a Google cookie if you don't already have one. If you have one, they read and record your unique ID number.

I like Chips Ahoy Cookies!
It's like a freak circus!

Cavalier22

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3309
  • Citizens! The Fatherland is in Danger
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2006, 12:28:29 PM »
im glad i voted for the guy who planned 9-11. He is very crafty to pull off an extremely complicated and difficult mission while having no one of significance seriously accuse him of wrongdoing.  wow. and he only had a C average
Valhalla awaits.

a_joker10

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2006, 12:36:57 PM »
SHHHH,
It was the skulls.....
Z

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #17 on: October 13, 2006, 12:37:48 PM »
im glad i voted for the guy who planned 9-11. He is very crafty to pull off an extremely complicated and difficult mission while having no one of significance seriously accuse him of wrongdoing.  wow. and he only had a C average

No one said he planned it.  

But he did read 'My Pet Goat' for 13 minutes after he heard the second tower was hit.  Secret Service rushed everyone in DC who mattered to underground bunkers or secure locations, and Bush stayed on schedule at a public school?  Heck, they had a portable missile battery placed on his hotel roof in Longboat Key the night before.  And a van load of Middle Eastern Men arrived at his hotel permiter and said they were scheduled to do an interview (remember, the N. Alliance leader had been killed in this trick the same week).  When Sec Srvce told the gentleman to contact the White House Press office, they scramed.  This was all reported in the papers.  So there were some small security concerns surrounding Bush that AM.  Do you find it odd at all that he didn't move immediately to a secure location when everyone else in DC did?

Let's not blame Bush, or anyone else for that matter.  let's have a new investigation into what really happened that day :)

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #18 on: October 13, 2006, 12:57:32 PM »
oh relax rob....but a new nic...and voila!
carpe` vaginum!

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5804
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #19 on: October 13, 2006, 06:42:02 PM »
White house ordered both the EPA and NIST reports.
White house changed the EPA report to meet its agenda - EPA whistleblowers revealed this.
Do ya really trust the integrity of the NIST report?

It's like if a kid turns in two pieces of homework and you find one is plagarized.

They changed the EPA report to get people back to work faster, and they were caught lying, because a scientist feeling people's lives were being endangered came fwd.  Just beacuse no NIST guys have come fwd yet, and no lives are in imminent risk from the paper... do ya really truth the paper's findings?  It's like the police report listing 'suicide' as the cause of death when the police chief's ex-wife turns up dead and he orders the report written.  HE gets to release it! lol...



We need an investigation done by worldwide experts, not US universities using federal grant $.  We need an investigation done by both supporters and critics- let them argue their evidence for the world to see.  jwb, there were pools of molten metal 50 foot deep there.  This doesn't happen from fire.   NIST said "There's a small chance that some melting can occur, but since that doesn't affect the fall, we're not going there.  But there were fires burning 3 months afterwards, after 3 months of hoses on it.  Only explosives does this man.
cut the BS read the fucker then critque it for us...

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #20 on: October 13, 2006, 07:17:13 PM »
cut the BS read the fucker then critque it for us...

1) NIST refuses to tell us why there are pools of molten metal 50 feet deep under the buildings.

2) The buildings defied the laws of physics in the ways which they fell

3) NIST started with the theory that the buildings fell and worked backwards.  They ignored all evidence which pointed to explosives- including testimony of dozens of firefighters, video showing audible monster booms, smoke rising 400 feet from the basements very early in attacks, and the very odd seismic data.

4) NIST won't touch WTC7 collapse with a ten-foot pole.  They quickly solved all other buildings but have no timeline for when they'll solve WTC7. 

5) Fire can't melt steel - lots of molten steel, steel and concrete "meteroid" effect (Where molten steel absorbs powdered concrete)

6) Pulverized concrete - Pulverized consistently from floor 80, all the way down to the basements.

7) AND MOST IMPORTANTLY - WHY didn't NIST test one piece of metal for explosives?  The collapse had some visual signs of a demolition, there were blasts recorded, firefighers and media listed many explosions that day, the 911 wives begged for a single test- and it was refused.  One test of 1 pound of metal would settle this.  Why wouldn't NIST do this, just to rule out bombs?  Is that responsible, complete scientific work? Don't smart guys like to disprove other possible causes to strengthen their own case?  WE're talking one small test with much much useful info outcome.

I could go on, but there are experts out there with far more holes and details than I have.


With even ONE big hole in the official story, don't you think another investigation into why the buildings fell is in order?

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5804
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #21 on: October 14, 2006, 12:04:15 AM »
1) NIST refuses to tell us why there are pools of molten metal 50 feet deep under the buildings.

2) The buildings defied the laws of physics in the ways which they fell

3) NIST started with the theory that the buildings fell and worked backwards.  They ignored all evidence which pointed to explosives- including testimony of dozens of firefighters, video showing audible monster booms, smoke rising 400 feet from the basements very early in attacks, and the very odd seismic data.

4) NIST won't touch WTC7 collapse with a ten-foot pole.  They quickly solved all other buildings but have no timeline for when they'll solve WTC7. 

5) Fire can't melt steel - lots of molten steel, steel and concrete "meteroid" effect (Where molten steel absorbs powdered concrete)

6) Pulverized concrete - Pulverized consistently from floor 80, all the way down to the basements.

7) AND MOST IMPORTANTLY - WHY didn't NIST test one piece of metal for explosives?  The collapse had some visual signs of a demolition, there were blasts recorded, firefighers and media listed many explosions that day, the 911 wives begged for a single test- and it was refused.  One test of 1 pound of metal would settle this.  Why wouldn't NIST do this, just to rule out bombs?  Is that responsible, complete scientific work? Don't smart guys like to disprove other possible causes to strengthen their own case?  WE're talking one small test with much much useful info outcome.

I could go on, but there are experts out there with far more holes and details than I have.


With even ONE big hole in the official story, don't you think another investigation into why the buildings fell is in order?

you are getting taken for a ride with these 911 truth clowns robbie...

I HAVE read quite a bit of the NIST report. It stands up to scientific analysis trust me I have some very smart people in my family who back this up - I ain't that bright myself although my IQ is 130...

If it didn't don't you think scientists from other countries NOT friendly with the USA would be all over the internet citing it's bullshit claims? most other countries LOVE calling out the US govt when they are fooling people...

Loose change is a JOKE. plenty of sites on the net refute it 100%

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #22 on: October 14, 2006, 12:27:57 AM »
you are getting taken for a ride with these 911 truth clowns robbie...

I HAVE read quite a bit of the NIST report. It stands up to scientific analysis trust me I have some very smart people in my family who back this up - I ain't that bright myself although my IQ is 130...

If it didn't don't you think scientists from other countries NOT friendly with the USA would be all over the internet citing it's bullshit claims? most other countries LOVE calling out the US govt when they are fooling people...

Loose change is a JOKE. plenty of sites on the net refute it 100%

I love your spirit.  I'm in the same boat as you, IQ 137 thru school. 

The thing is, many of the countries that don't like us HAVE put out the info saying it was an inside job.  And some have leaked the warnings they gave us, plus the request from our govt to stay quiet about it.  Newspapers all over the world talk about it all the time.  Cadadians know too.  They get different media than us.

Loose change is rookie level stuff to this (although the debunking attempt is bad- they attempt to debunk released govt documents - silly.)

The points I made have come from research pieces and documentaries which are above loose change.  There is the Blue Media video -filmed from across the bay, it records every single bomb blast that day.  9 before tower 1 goes, 3 before tower 2 goes.   There is 911 Mysteries - scientific breakdown of the collapses.  There are many more.  There is the Jones work, tarpley, fetzer, griffin.

I could go on, but you get the point.  The 911 Commission members admit there are 99 questions unanswered for every one they answered.  Simple facts, man.  WTC7 - how the F did it fall?  Molten steel - where the F did it come from?



I love the repub party, I love my country, I like Bush, and I supported the war.  But I've made this a strong hobby of mine for 8 months because I truly believe it's the most important event of our lives.  I know it was an inside job, jwb.  I know it was.  You're reading the NIST report - it was released by the white house, man.  Do you seriously think they'd put out something which made them look bad?

I invite you to break down the 7 points I made above.  Dude, I cried when I first accepted it.  Scared the shit outta me.  How? How the hell?  You know?  But to just say "yeah, WTC7 fell for no reason" and "yeah, molten steel is weird" and on and on for 100 different anomalies--- there comes a point where you just might be brave and look in the mirror and stop being scared.

It was an inside job.  it's all over every news show tnoight as they try to fight it coming out.  hannity, Brit hume, Oreilly... they all call it Unamerican and evil to question the official story----- but they NEVER discuss the evidence.  They will dispell a theory they don't understand.  They will call someone an idiot when they don't even know what WTC7 is... "What does WTC7 have to do with the twin towers? It wasn't attacked - it has nothing to do with 911!" I heard that shit the other night and i laughed so hard. 

They're in trouble. It's coming out. 


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #23 on: October 14, 2006, 12:39:09 AM »
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782&q=Improbable+Collapse

jwb - this is a new one about the science behind the buildings falling. 

enjoy!

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5804
Re: Google knows you very very very well.
« Reply #24 on: October 14, 2006, 12:45:25 AM »
I love your spirit.  I'm in the same boat as you, IQ 137 thru school. 

The thing is, many of the countries that don't like us HAVE put out the info saying it was an inside job.  And some have leaked the warnings they gave us, plus the request from our govt to stay quiet about it.  Newspapers all over the world talk about it all the time.  Cadadians know too.  They get different media than us.

Loose change is rookie level stuff to this (although the debunking attempt is bad- they attempt to debunk released govt documents - silly.)

The points I made have come from research pieces and documentaries which are above loose change.  There is the Blue Media video -filmed from across the bay, it records every single bomb blast that day.  9 before tower 1 goes, 3 before tower 2 goes.   There is 911 Mysteries - scientific breakdown of the collapses.  There are many more.  There is the Jones work, tarpley, fetzer, griffin.

I could go on, but you get the point.  The 911 Commission members admit there are 99 questions unanswered for every one they answered.  Simple facts, man.  WTC7 - how the F did it fall?  Molten steel - where the F did it come from?



I love the repub party, I love my country, I like Bush, and I supported the war.  But I've made this a strong hobby of mine for 8 months because I truly believe it's the most important event of our lives.  I know it was an inside job, jwb.  I know it was.  You're reading the NIST report - it was released by the white house, man.  Do you seriously think they'd put out something which made them look bad?

I invite you to break down the 7 points I made above.  Dude, I cried when I first accepted it.  Scared the shit outta me.  How? How the hell?  You know?  But to just say "yeah, WTC7 fell for no reason" and "yeah, molten steel is weird" and on and on for 100 different anomalies--- there comes a point where you just might be brave and look in the mirror and stop being scared.

It was an inside job.  it's all over every news show tnoight as they try to fight it coming out.  hannity, Brit hume, Oreilly... they all call it Unamerican and evil to question the official story----- but they NEVER discuss the evidence.  They will dispell a theory they don't understand.  They will call someone an idiot when they don't even know what WTC7 is... "What does WTC7 have to do with the twin towers? It wasn't attacked - it has nothing to do with 911!" I heard that shit the other night and i laughed so hard. 

They're in trouble. It's coming out. 


I don't discount that bush knew a lot more than he gives out about the terror threat. his dad is an A grade cvunt.

the planes brought down those buildings though I am convinced of that though i'm afraid... i personally don't think they EXPECTED them to collpase though...

as for your points I'm not a metals expert and neither are you. building 7 WAS extensively damgaged on the WTC side and the fires WERE extensive. we had plenty of coverage on the day about that one coming down here in sydney I remember...