Author Topic: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion  (Read 3124 times)

jmt1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1590

Dos Equis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2006, 11:03:03 AM »
"Other reports have said Snipes pockets between $8-$15 million per film and is among the highest-paid actors in Hollywood. Since the 1980s, he has starred in more than 50 movies and has produced about a dozen films."

Geeze Louise.  Just goes to show you that greed often trumps common sense.  I hate paying taxes, but when you're pulling in $8 to $15 million per film, pay your dang taxes and enjoy the rest of your seven-figure income.  How hard can that be??? 


Your MAAAAaaaa

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1402
  • GETBIGS MINISTER OF SEXUAL HEALTH
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2006, 11:06:36 AM »
i don't know what the tax rate is  but its pains me to pay tax!

So when you have got one massive ego and his stash and a fat tax bill he is probably going to think he is above it in his weird hollywood mind.


ta ta
Pm me for STI advice @ NO COST

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2006, 03:09:43 PM »
"Other reports have said Snipes pockets between $8-$15 million per film and is among the highest-paid actors in Hollywood. Since the 1980s, he has starred in more than 50 movies and has produced about a dozen films."

Geeze Louise.  Just goes to show you that greed often trumps common sense.  I hate paying taxes, but when you're pulling in $8 to $15 million per film, pay your dang taxes and enjoy the rest of your seven-figure income.  How hard can that be??? 



Yeah, I don't get that either.


Just write the check and go back to banging a dozen chicks in your mansion...........
HAHA, RON.....

jmt1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1590
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2006, 03:14:34 PM »
stupidity... ???


Snipes is also charged with six counts of failure to file income tax returns since 1999. A federal judge issued an arrest warrant for Snipes, but federal officials hope the publicity surrounding the case because of Snipes' celebrity will spur the actor-producer to surrender voluntarily. Neither Snipes nor his former attorneys returned phone calls and e-mail requests seeking comment Tuesday. A relative in South Carolina would not comment.

The indictment, handed up by a federal grand jury last week in Jacksonville, Fla., says Snipes sent bogus checks worth $14 million to the IRS for his estimated tax liabilities in recent years.

Snipes, 44, also attempted to receive, but did not get, refunds worth more than $11 million from taxes he already had paid in 1996 and 1997, according to the indictment.

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2006, 04:13:18 PM »
i don't know what the tax rate is  but its pains me to pay tax!

So when you have got one massive ego and his stash and a fat tax bill he is probably going to think he is above it in his weird hollywood mind.


ta ta

If you think it pains you to pay taxes now, wait until November, if the Democrats win it's going to kill you!

Dos Equis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2006, 04:18:12 PM »
If you think it pains you to pay taxes now, wait until November, if the Democrats win it's going to kill you!

Zealot!   ;D

I agree.

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2006, 04:26:35 PM »

SinCitysmallGUY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4317
  • FIST-ta-CUFF Radio
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #8 on: October 18, 2006, 08:14:29 PM »
If you think it pains you to pay taxes now, wait until November, if the Democrats win it's going to kill you!

Only if your a rich bastard already finally a break for us poor people.....

jmt1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1590
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2006, 08:45:59 PM »
If you think it pains you to pay taxes now, wait until November, if the Democrats win it's going to kill you!

yeah wont that be ashame if someone actually wants to make the wealthy pay their fair share.

hopefully we will have president hillary coming soon.

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2006, 09:37:16 PM »
yeah wont that be ashame if someone actually wants to make the wealthy pay their fair share.


LMAO....you're delusional, who in hell told you that, oh yeah I forgot, this is the same party that doesn't dare bring up how well the economy is doing so close to an election!!

Dos Equis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2006, 12:23:51 AM »
yeah wont that be ashame if someone actually wants to make the wealthy pay their fair share.

hopefully we will have president hillary coming soon.

And who do you think pays most of the taxes in this country? 

If Hillary is elected president we are all going to hell.  Might as well sell the ranch, cash in the stocks, head for the hills. 

onlyme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19328
  • Don't Fuck With Bears
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #12 on: October 19, 2006, 01:27:13 AM »
They just sentranced Sunny Garcia for tax evasion.  He didn't report $400,000 on his tax forms.  He is a professional surfer here. It was just on the news

Colossus_500

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3993
  • Psalm 139
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #13 on: October 19, 2006, 08:05:28 AM »
It's amazing how sheltered some celebs are.   :o  To think the IRS wasn't going to come after him for not paying $12mil in taxes?  That's not sheltered, that's just outright stupidity. 

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #14 on: October 19, 2006, 09:25:58 AM »
Quote
They just sentranced Sunny Garcia for tax evasion.
Is this a ghetto thang? ??? Remarkably stupid, especially someone high-profile.

jmt1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1590
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #15 on: October 19, 2006, 01:15:06 PM »
And who do you think pays most of the taxes in this country? 

If Hillary is elected president we are all going to hell.  Might as well sell the ranch, cash in the stocks, head for the hills. 

 conservative economic policies have torn our country apart....just look at some of the stats.

before reagan became president there was still reasonable disparity between the rich and poor....after reagan by the early 90s the richest 5% controlled over 70% of our national wealth....by the time clinton took office that percentage was even higher....the middle class which had been very strong before reagan, fell close to the poverty line....and the homeless population went through the roof....thank you trickle down economics.

when the wealth is controlled by the richest of the rich they dont put it back into the economy...they stash it away in off shore tax heavens...when tax breaks are given to the middle class and poor they buy homes, cars, open small business.,ect.

look at economic stats over the last 100 years and it will show that everytime we had a republican president our economy has been in shambles.

the only way to stop the republican demolition of our economy is to support whoever is on the democratic ticket.

Dos Equis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #16 on: October 19, 2006, 01:27:26 PM »
conservative economic policies have torn our country apart....just look at some of the stats.

before reagan became president there was still reasonable disparity between the rich and poor....after reagan by the early 90s the richest 5% controlled over 70% of our national wealth....by the time clinton took office that percentage was even higher....the middle class which had been very strong before reagan, fell close to the poverty line....and the homeless population went through the roof....thank you trickle down economics.

when the wealth is controlled by the richest of the rich they dont put it back into the economy...they stash it away in off shore tax heavens...when tax breaks are given to the middle class and poor they buy homes, cars, open small business.,ect.

look at economic stats over the last 100 years and it will show that everytime we had a republican president our economy has been in shambles.

the only way to stop the republican demolition of our economy is to support whoever is on the democratic ticket.

So you think redistribution of wealth and higher taxes are the answer?  That's what liberals have advocated for years. 

The economy did very well under Clinton, but what happened to the economy when Carter was president? 

Also, Democrats killed Hawaii.  They ran the state for 50 years and we wound up being one of the most overtaxed places in the country, with high unemployment, and an awful business climate.  Since we elected a Republican governor four years ago, the discussion has changed from raising taxes at every opportunity to lowering them, we have probably the lowest unemployment rate in the country, and we've made great strides towards improving how business is done here.  More importantly, a 700 million budget deficit was turned into a 700 million surplus in four years.   

But I was initially responding to your "fair share of taxes" comment.  The "rich" already pay most of the taxes in this country already.  What many liberals want is a reduction of taxes for people who pay the least amount to begin with, instead of an across the board cut (which I favor).  We are ALL overtaxed.  Except for low income people, who often don't pay any taxes when rebates and the Earned Income Tax Credit is factored in. 

I don't believe in punishing success.   

Colossus_500

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3993
  • Psalm 139
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #17 on: October 19, 2006, 01:30:51 PM »
And count on seeing the marriage penalty tax being rolled back if the Democratic party gets the House/Senate back. 

jmt1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1590
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #18 on: October 19, 2006, 01:44:52 PM »
 my point was giving tax breaks to the wealthy and deregulations on big business do not build the economy....they hurt the middle class,  destroy the poor and will gradually turn our country into a corporate dictatorship.

clintons economic policies worked on building up the middle class again and helped the poor  thats why we had a surplus.....which  of course bush jr is re directing towards the corporations and the rich.

Dos Equis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #19 on: October 19, 2006, 02:04:34 PM »
my point was giving tax breaks to the wealthy and deregulations on big business do not build the economy....they hurt the middle class,  destroy the poor and will gradually turn our country into a corporate dictatorship.

clintons economic policies worked on building up the middle class again and helped the poor  thats why we had a surplus.....which  of course bush jr is re directing towards the corporations and the rich.

How does cutting taxes across the board hurt the middle class?

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #20 on: October 19, 2006, 02:11:30 PM »
Selfish mother fucker...

Dos Equis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63727
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #21 on: October 19, 2006, 02:19:59 PM »
Get back to me when you start paying taxes son.  Just in case you've forgotten, you're 19 years old.   

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #22 on: October 19, 2006, 02:21:23 PM »
"Other reports have said Snipes pockets between $8-$15 million per film and is among the highest-paid actors in Hollywood. Since the 1980s, he has starred in more than 50 movies and has produced about a dozen films."

Geeze Louise.  Just goes to show you that greed often trumps common sense.  I hate paying taxes, but when you're pulling in $8 to $15 million per film, pay your dang taxes and enjoy the rest of your seven-figure income.  How hard can that be??? 




Lock the fucker up in Pelican Bay. >:(
The House that Ruth built

jmt1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1590
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #23 on: October 19, 2006, 02:29:34 PM »
Working poor suffer under Bush tax cuts
Cash crunch: loss of services outweighs tax gains for millions


DETROIT — The Bush administration and Congress have scaled back programs that aid the poor to help pay for $600 billion in tax breaks that went primarily to those who earn more than $288,800 a year.
To offset the loss of the tax revenue, the administration has amassed record federal deficits and trimmed social spending.
The affected programs — job training, housing, higher education and an array of social services — provide safety nets for the poor. Many programs are critical elements in welfare-to-work initiatives and were already badly underfunded.
A six-month Detroit News investigation showed that as a result of the withering government assistance, working poor and destitute Americans are increasingly likely to be placed on waiting lists for help, receive reduced services, or be denied service entirely.
The News, after interviewing scores of people across the United States and examining thousands of pages of federal and state financial records, determined the loss of services cost many poor Americans more money than they saved from the tax cuts.
In many cases, the poorest lost services and got no tax cut at all.
The analysis of the three Bush tax cuts is based in part on estimates by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, using data from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
The poorest 20 percent of workers, who earn on average $16,600 annually, will get a tax break of $250 this year, which is less than 2 percent of their income. That amounts to about 68 cents a day.
By comparison, the richest 1 percent, with average incomes topping $1.1 million, will receive $78,460 in tax cuts this year. That is nearly 7 percent of their income.
For the poor, inequities of the Bush tax cuts are further exacerbated by the long-standing disparities in the Social Security tax, which has increased nine times since 1977.
Earnings are taxed for Social Security at a rate of 6.2 percent on income up to $87,900. But there is no Social Security tax on income above that amount. For America’s poorest workers — those who struggle to make ends meet — every dollar is subject to the Social Security tax.
The richest 10 percent, who make on average $288,800, will pay less than 2 percent of their income for Social Security.
In fact, while most workers pay into Social Security all year, millionaires — who pay less than half a percent — would be finished paying it by the first four weeks of the year.
For taxpayers who earn more than $87,900, it amounts to an estimated $85 billion break.
Meanwhile, the Bush tax breaks for the richest 10 percent this year alone will total $148 billion.
That is twice as much as the government will spend on job training, $6.2 billion; college Pell grants, $12 billion; public housing, $6.3 billion; low-income rental subsidies, $19 billion; child care, $4.8 billion; insurance for low-income children, $5.2 billion; low-income energy assistance, $1.8 billion; meals for shut-ins, $180 million; and welfare, $16.9 billion.
The reduction in government assistance that accompanied the tax cuts couldn’t come at a worse time.
The number of Americans living in poverty has risen 10 percent since 2000, after falling in the late 1990s. Nearly 36 million Americans — one in eight — now live in poverty and tens of millions more are considered working poor.
The economy has lost nearly a million jobs — 241,000 in Michigan alone — since it slid into recession in March 2001.
That has increased the demand for government programs from millions of Americans who are now more likely to know hunger, homelessness and chronic need.
America’s working poor — its secretaries, cooks, laborers, clerks and others — are finding it difficult to meet even basic needs.
For the poor, child care and housing can consume more than 80 percent of their income. And 45 million Americans, most of them low-income, have no health insurance.
Housing in many cities is so unaffordable that although 39 percent of the homeless work, they can’t pay for even a substandard apartment, according to a 2003 survey by the country’s mayors.
Compounding the problem, massive budget shortfalls have forced states to pare back their contributions to federal programs. At the same time, charitable contributions declined.
Those mired in poverty, hoping to wean themselves from public assistance, have received little help from Congress in their struggle to earn a living wage. Government is now offering job training to fewer people than in years past.
Nearly 6 percent of all U.S. workers earn minimum wage, $5.15 an hour.
Based on a 40-hour workweek, the annual minimum wage of $10,700 places a single parent of two well below the poverty level. Minimum wage earners got very little under the Bush tax cuts. Key social program cuts have left them with fewer places to turn for help.

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: wesely snipes wanted for tax evasion
« Reply #24 on: October 19, 2006, 03:13:38 PM »


clintons economic policies worked on building up the middle class again and helped the poor  thats why we had a surplus.....


Before you post such nonsense, just take into consideration that Clinton had to through a Republican congress first...........so thank the Republicans!