I think my thoughts on the Dorian/Ronnie debate are a little more honest and fair then some delusional people around here.
dorian was not as good as Ronnie size or shape wise. His back was not as thick or wide as Ronnie's either. Where Dorian shined was his density and overall muscularity. You cannot see a roll of fat or water on him in those clips, not one tiny little roll. His pec line, lower back and legs were all dense as granite. Most people, including Ron hold a little water somewhere.
Dorian's back had a totally different look to Ronnie's. It was as if it was carved out of stone. His lower back was so detailed and it has not been surpased condition wise since.
Ronnie is a better overall BBer with better genetics, shape, size, symmetry (in his prime) but Doz had a look of stone that one has had before or since. Even Munzer, although has more striations did not have as hard and dense appearance as Dorian.
Give them both credit where it is due. They are both freaks and are both worthy of being up there with best albeit for differing reasons.
