after watching gettysburg i wondered who was the best of all time.
Lee?
grant?
alexander the great?
Patton?
Rommel(field marshal i know)
ghengis khan?
Napoleon?
Guderian?
Manstein?
Zhukov?
Hannibal?
perhaps some roman or greek fellow?
someone else?
remember its not just how much they did, its how much they did with what they had, and their relative postitions counted as well; for example, lee did not conquer any territory, while napoleon had most of europe. however, what if their positions had been switched? would they still have been as effective in each other's places?