The bengals offense was considered the most potent in the NFL when the Pats played them. You are wrong. You make excuses for the Bengals yet they where hailed as the best team in the NFL at this time. Typical Indy fan. All excuses. I said the colts barley beat teams because you claim they are better than the pats. Yet the pats beat teams more convincingly and have not had to come back with MVP QB performances in every game. The Pats also got these wins with Brady and the receivers not on the same page and struggling. This has now been fixed. The colts have no defense against the run. NONE. Have you seen Maroney and Dillon play lol? The Pats showed last night they have a solid passing game. Our defense is also much better. We respect Indy and think they are a very dangerous team. Your original post talks about the Pats so called problems. What about Indy? Key defensive loses, cant stop the run, constantly coming back, Complete dependence on the QB to have steller games. We will see how that pans out when Manning does not have all day to use his incredable skills to move the ball.
I say "we" because that is our mentality out here. You also took it literal and called me on it which proves you have nothing and are reaching. I have attended every single pats home game including preseason. Cliche my ass.
I can see you are a sour Indy fan. I would be two if I could never get it done when it counted. My original post never bashes Indy or gloated about the Pats wins. They where all respectful and factual. I also stated we play one game at a time and take every opponent seriously. We never think we are going to win a game because a team is less talented than us.
Ps... I stated the bears where better than the colts as they are the best team in football. Not the colts. Waymore complete than Indy. Indy is all offense. A great one it is. but anyone who knows football knows superbowls are won with defense and a great running game to compliment an offense.
oh brother, for the second time i proved that the Begals offense was not the best in the NFL at the
time. no great running game at the time and no healthy franchise QB which was admitted by the coach and QB himself...so how could it be the beat offense at the time? you say the Bengals offense was the best at the time..prove it. i just proved why they werent the best. please explain this to me. not that it matters now but you used that argument.
-
"The Pats showed last night they have a solid passing game" one game does not decide that sorry. any objective fan would admit at least that.
-
"the colts barley beat teams" again so what??
-
"Your original post talks about the Pats so called problems." uh..no i didnt. you must learn to read more carefully what specifically did i say about the Pats so called problems hhhmmmm?
-
"close games against less talented teams." youre wrong again look at the numer of winning teams Indy beat compared to that of the Pats. yes it is close but Indy has beaten more winning teams.
-
"I also stated we play one game at a time and take every opponent seriously. We never think we are going to win a game because a team is less talented than us." again with the "we" whatever your reasoning ...you are not a New England Patriot, are out there practicing and busting your ass? no you are a mere couch po-ta-to who is including yourself in the team which you are not a part of. if you walked up to Tom Brady and said " boy we had a great game last night" he would look at you with complete confusion..or stupidity.
-
"I can see you are a sour Indy fan." if that is so then your eyes defy you, or your judgement is not logical either way you are wrong..again. i hate Peyton and Indy. you'll never guess what team i am a fan off, mainly due to your train of thought.