Its been said by multiple sources that taking an anti-estrogen (be it a SERM like Nolvadex or anit-aromatse like Arimidex) while on a cycle of an aromatizing steroid would compromise the gains that one would make on the cycle. In other words, a little estrogen (along with the water and fat retention that it brings) is actually beneficial when you're bulking.
I'm scared to death of gyno and I would take nolvadex or arimidex the entire length of a 12 week cycle just to greatly reduce my chances of getting gyno. However my mentor believes in the school of thought that says that taking any kind of anti-estrogen is detrimental to gains.
Here's my idea. Take nolvadex which is a SERM mainly affecting the cells in the breast tissue from being affected by estrogen. That way I'm only blocking the effects of estrogen in the breast area thereby hopefully avoiding gyno (or greatly reducing my chances of getting it) while letting estrogen works it magic on the rest of my body to aid in gains.
What do you guys think. I would greatly appreciate any feedback and/or opinions.
If the goal is gains at any price, then by all means, drop the anti-estrogens and anti-aromatases...
You might notice some uncomfortable sides like water retention, fat gain, gyno and hypertension, but that is the price you may have to pay for the decision.
If quality of life is important to you, consider using Nolvadex at least, if not Arimidex in low doses.
Compromise on the dosage, perhaps 10MG Nolvadex or .5MG Arimidex, instead of the usual amounts.
Think shades of gray instead of black and white when it comes to AAS protocol.
I'm sure your mentor has your best interests in mind, however, he might not be as educated and experienced as he'd like to think he is.
The only way you'll truly know how your body responds to AAS without anti-estrogens is to try it (at your risk).
Good luck in whatever you choose.
DIV