Author Topic: CINDY MARGOLIS NUDE IN PLAYBOY (Read 23135 times)

Special Ed · « **on:** November 10, 2006, 03:20:34 PM »

Beats the skank out of those fitness girls if you ask me...

http://behindbarbedwire.blogspot.com/2006/11/cindy-margolis-playboy-december-2006.html

Special "Time to Make the Donut's Filling" Ed

corinth · « **Reply #1 on:** November 10, 2006, 03:31:12 PM »

Thanks Ed.

Always figured Cindy was a "landing strip" kind of gal......now I have confirmation....

tommywishbone · « **Reply #2 on:** November 10, 2006, 03:34:45 PM »

Nice pics, no doubt... but damn those things are retouched and photo shopped to within an inch of being animated. I've worked on MTV productions that featured Cindy and I've seen her many times in Vegas and she looks nothing like those pics.

Those shots look great, but that just ain't Cindy Margolis. Well it is... but it ain't.

bmacsys · « **Reply #3 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:12:46 PM »

Wonder why she finally decided to show some skin?

Bluto · « **Reply #4 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:15:27 PM »

She's been nude before

Bluto · « **Reply #5 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:16:19 PM »

photos look like shit, i dont know who buys playboy with bullshit pictures like that

gordiano · « **Reply #6 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:19:17 PM »

That chick is way overrated. I don't see what the big deal is.

She kinda has a "Sasha" face, which is not a good thing..........

danielson · « **Reply #7 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:23:06 PM »

She was hot at 30, but she is 40 now. Great for her age, but ffs Playboy can find hotter bitches than that

300 · « **Reply #8 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:24:37 PM »

She's hot as hell, but the pics are airbrushed to shit. Like tommywish said, almost looks like an animation.

Captain Equipoise · « **Reply #9 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:26:46 PM »

Say what you want, in those pics she's fucking STUNNING..
damn
I keep forgetting how good programs photoshop and aura really are.

carvedoutofwood · « **Reply #10 on:** November 10, 2006, 05:03:08 PM »

Quote from: tommywishbone on November 10, 2006, 03:34:45 PM

Nice pics, no doubt... but damn those things are retouched and photo shopped to within an inch of being animated. I've worked on MTV productions that featured Cindy and I've seen her many times in Vegas and she looks nothing like those pics.

Those shots look great, but that just ain't Cindy Margolis. Well it is... but it ain't.

well said

Farcry · « **Reply #11 on:** November 10, 2006, 05:44:53 PM »

way past her prime

bigbalddaddy · « **Reply #12 on:** November 10, 2006, 05:49:10 PM »

I'd rock that broad in to the year 2020! With my test levels lately I wouldn't last but 30 seconds the first round and maybe a minute/half the next! Then it's time for a quick RTD of muscle milk before I pound it the third time and turn on sports center! Past her prime? I don't give a rats ass, i'm all in bruddas!!!

Van_Bilderass · « **Reply #13 on:** November 10, 2006, 06:17:19 PM »

Quote from: tommywishbone on November 10, 2006, 03:34:45 PM

Nice pics, no doubt... but damn those things are retouched and photo shopped to within an inch of being animated. I've worked on MTV productions that featured Cindy and I've seen her many times in Vegas and she looks nothing like those pics.

Those shots look great, but that just ain't Cindy Margolis. Well it is... but it ain't.

Exactly what I was thinking.

I see no point in looking at porno that is essentially animated.

Jr. Yates · « **Reply #14 on:** November 10, 2006, 06:17:27 PM »

Quote from: Captain Equipoise on November 10, 2006, 04:26:46 PM

Say what you want, in those pics she's fucking STUNNING..
damn
I keep forgetting how good programs photoshop and aura really are.

haha yup i agree.

Disgusted · « **Reply #15 on:** November 10, 2006, 06:25:50 PM »

Terrible, she looks like she is made out of plastic. Playboy's photos suck.

dav-bol · « **Reply #16 on:** November 10, 2006, 07:03:47 PM »

Fake tan, fake tits, fake nose and eyes....but worst of all NO ASS IN SIGHT.

Skinny no ass having old skank.

I'd hit it.

gordiano · « **Reply #17 on:** November 10, 2006, 07:09:19 PM »

Quote from: Disgusted on November 10, 2006, 06:25:50 PM

Terrible, she looks like she is made out of plastic. Playboy's photos suck.

Yep.

I stopped looking at playboy after I turned 16...........better shit out there. PB sucks. You never see pussy, or anyhting worth stroking to. If you are gonna do nude, show us ALL the goods. Fuck teasing with your airbrushed tits and ass......

onlyme · « **Reply #18 on:** November 10, 2006, 07:17:16 PM »

Quote from: dav-bol on November 10, 2006, 07:03:47 PM

Fake tan, fake tits, fake nose and eyes....but worst of all NO ASS IN SIGHT.

Skinny no ass having old skank.

I'd hit it.

Yea really horrible

And you just described more than half of the models out there. And if anyone looks like that being her age then thats awesome

youandme · « **Reply #19 on:** November 10, 2006, 07:21:26 PM »

Quote from: Disgusted on November 10, 2006, 06:25:50 PM

Terrible, she looks like she is made out of plastic. Playboy's photos suck.

airbrushed to hell and back

Special Ed · « **Reply #20 on:** November 10, 2006, 07:21:37 PM »

Quote from: dav-bol on November 10, 2006, 07:03:47 PM

Fake tan, fake tits, fake nose and eyes....but worst of all NO ASS IN SIGHT.
Skinny no ass having old skank.
I'd hit it.

She claimed on Howard Stern the other day that her boobs are natural. I don't think anyone actually believes her, but if she'll allow it I will do the official test.

Fake tan fer sure. Eyes probably done. Nose hasn't changed in 2 decades. Remember, Playboy originally asked her to pose 22 years ago when she was 18.

Other celebs that should have posed earlier in their careers:

1) Britney Spears - too bad she'll make us wait another 10 years
2) Jaclyn Smith - Sure she looks amazing but a nude 60-year old Charlie Angel? Pass!
3) Heather Thomas - Fall Guy pin-upper wishes she had taken the 1M when she had the chance.
4) Linda Carter - Wonder Woman made me wish I had x-ray vision and sorry I had an electric blanket.
5) The Bush sisters - Dayum, think of the money Hef would pay them. They'll come around in 2020.

Special "Pornosseur" Ed

Croatch · « **Reply #21 on:** November 10, 2006, 11:33:51 PM »

Jesus, what a waste of a photo shoot. The airbrushing is really over the top. Might as well just cloned her a 3rd titty. I don't believe her rack is fake, but looks it there because of the digital touch ups. And I'm a little upset her rack isn't bigger because I always thought they were. Excessive cardio probably dropped her down to a D.
I would dump a quart of cum in there, preferably...my own.

Jerryme7 · « **Reply #22 on:** November 10, 2006, 11:38:55 PM »

The most beautiful jewish woman ever!!

Oblique · « **Reply #23 on:** November 11, 2006, 12:17:04 AM »

Perhaps.

Natalie Portman and a young Michelle Pfeiffer could more than give her a run for the money.

And she admitted to Howard Stern once that she had the nosejob.

Fake nose, tits...and probably other parts too.

Disgusted · « **Reply #24 on:** November 11, 2006, 12:46:34 AM »

Quote from: Oblique on November 11, 2006, 12:17:04 AM

Perhaps.

Natalie Portman and a young Michelle Pfeiffer could more than give her a run for the money.

And she admitted to Howard Stern once that she had the nosejob.

Fake nose, tits...and probably other parts too.

Natalie Portman