« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.  (Read 3491 times)

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« on: November 18, 2006, 04:56:54 AM »
Discuss.
Logged
Bodybuilding Pro.com

gtbro1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2006, 04:59:43 AM »
 He lost because of that stupid Moses costume and him giving credit to Jesus...Everyone knows the IFBB worships Satan.
Logged

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2006, 05:28:12 AM »
He lost because he was the worse BBer on that day. End of story.
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2006, 06:06:41 AM »
the purpose of Ronnie losing was to raise the bar...



 :)

Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Farcry

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 343
  • Getbig!
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2006, 06:13:53 AM »
come on don't show pictures comparing a 99 ronnie to jay, we all know it is not even close, the reason for ronnie losing this year is becuse he is terrible, sois jay, they had a chance to go another way with martienz or someone else but next year when phil heath comes in things will change
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2006, 06:19:29 AM »
Quote from: Farcry on November 18, 2006, 06:13:53 AM
come on don't show pictures comparing a 99 ronnie to jay, we all know it is not even close, the reason for ronnie losing this year is becuse he is terrible, sois jay, they had a chance to go another way with martienz or someone else but next year when phil heath comes in things will change

LOL

I know,  I was just being funny.

Ronnie 99 is so far above 06 Jay its not even close
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Triple-H_2005

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1316
  • I mostly lurk...
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2006, 06:24:57 AM »
We may never see (or at least not for a really long time) a physique that compares to '99 Olympia OR '01 Arnold Classic Ronnie.

Those versions of Mr. Coleman were inhuman.
Logged

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2006, 06:27:41 AM »
ronnie this year wasnt even 2nd IMO, he looked horrible. You cant honestly tell me that even as poor as he was, he was better than Vic
Logged
Scouser on Tour

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40873
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2006, 06:33:13 AM »
Quote from: Matt C on November 18, 2006, 04:56:54 AM
Let's not deny it - Ronnie has won in similar circumstances before and this was not his worst performance since 1998.  I think if they gave it to Ronnie this year, Ronnie would think he can just keep coming back and winning indefinitely.  So by having him lose, Ronnie gets the clue he is beatable and comes back one last time for #9 and then hangs it up - rather than continuing on until he is 50.

Discuss.


I like that explanation.  I can see it being a bit true. 
Logged
7

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2006, 06:35:34 AM »
Quote from: Triple-H_2005 on November 18, 2006, 06:24:57 AM
We may never see (or at least not for a really long time) a physique that compares to '99 Olympia OR '01 Arnold Classic Ronnie.

Those versions of Mr. Coleman were inhuman.

very true.

Ronnie did not look good in 2006 at the O. but looked much improved at one of the grand prix shows (can't remember which one, but he should have beat Jay at it)
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hurricane Beef !

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4723
  • Beat Coach, Wes & Chaos So Bad . . .
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2006, 07:20:15 AM »
Hulkster, I'd love to see pictures from the 2001 AC. Can you ost some?

The Beef
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2006, 07:31:55 AM »
Quote from: Hurricane Beef ! on November 18, 2006, 07:20:15 AM
Hulkster, I'd love to see pictures from the 2001 AC. Can you ost some?

The Beef

here you go:



Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2006, 07:49:41 AM »
ronnie lost cuz he was off....need i say more
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2006, 09:07:42 AM »
Quote from: Hulkster on November 18, 2006, 06:19:29 AM
LOL

I know,  I was just being funny.

Ronnie 99 is so far above 06 Jay its not even close


jay would so easily dwarf ronnie from 99.

ronnie has more striations and detail, but jay is so much bigger.

i'm not necessarily saying jay would win, but it would be close.
Logged
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

body88

  • Guest
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2006, 09:50:02 AM »
Quote from: Hulkster on November 18, 2006, 06:06:41 AM
the purpose of Ronnie losing was to raise the bar...



 :)





Hulkster!!! lets post unfair pictures from different time periods to try to prove a point!!! Forget posting pictures from the actual contest that clearly show Jay beating Ronnie!!!


Logged

body88

  • Guest
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #15 on: November 18, 2006, 09:52:47 AM »
I will post the two shots that tell it all. Equal lighting, exact same point in the pose. Both flexing. Jay wins. Better condition, better back, Better sweep, better leg detail front and back, stirated abs, stirated quads, better calves etc etc. Sorry guys aint gonna change  :D
Logged

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #16 on: November 18, 2006, 09:53:44 AM »
Quote from: body88 on November 18, 2006, 09:50:02 AM


Hulkster!!! lets post unfair pictures from different time periods to try to prove a point!!! Forget posting pictures from the actual contest that clearly show Jay beating Ronnie!!!



THE FIRST PIC CLEARLY SHOWS RONNIE TORN FROM EVERYWHERE...HOLY SHIT :o
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #17 on: November 18, 2006, 09:55:03 AM »
Quote from: body88 on November 18, 2006, 09:52:47 AM
I will post the two shots that tell it all. Equal lighting, exact same point in the pose. Both flexing. Jay wins. Better condition, better back, better leg detail front and back, stirated abs, better calves etc etc. Sorry guys aint gonna change  :D
ronnie is gettin brutally owned there..no point arguing here.the pics clearly shows ronnie was torn from everywhere.but hulkster still lives in the year  1999...he is a retard body88
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

Deadpool

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14027
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #18 on: November 18, 2006, 10:00:34 AM »
so do you think he's gonna get #9?
Logged
X

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #19 on: November 18, 2006, 10:02:33 AM »
Quote from: Medford on November 18, 2006, 10:00:34 AM
so do you think he's gonna get #9?
NO!!!!!!!
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #20 on: November 18, 2006, 10:06:21 AM »
a
Logged
Bodybuilding Pro.com

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79732
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #21 on: November 18, 2006, 10:08:42 AM »
Quote from: Matt C on November 18, 2006, 10:06:21 AM
Sure, Ronnie was off, but he has been before.  My point was that he has won before under identical conditions.  In fact, in 2002 he was even more off and still won.

he wasn't as off condition wise in 2002 ( nice gut )
Logged

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #22 on: November 18, 2006, 10:12:42 AM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 18, 2006, 10:08:42 AM
he wasn't as off condition wise in 2002 ( nice gut )

I would consider it an overall worse performance despite his conditioning being better - and he still won.
Logged
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #23 on: November 18, 2006, 10:33:05 AM »
Quote from: IceCold on November 18, 2006, 09:07:42 AM

jay would so easily dwarf ronnie from 99.

ronnie has more striations and detail, but jay is so much bigger.

i'm not necessarily saying jay would win, but it would be close.

Ronnie was 257 in 99.

How big was Jay in 2006?

270?
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: The purpose of Ronnie losing in 2006.
« Reply #24 on: November 18, 2006, 10:35:26 AM »
Quote from: Hulkster on November 18, 2006, 10:33:05 AM
Ronnie was 257 in 99.

How big was Jay in 2006?

270?
oooh shut up hulkster.stop living in 1999..this 2006 and your butt boy lost to king jay cutler..no mattter if jay was 270lsb or 280lbs..your pimp lost..get over it hulkgay
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »