« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size  (Read 2755 times)

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« on: November 22, 2006, 12:12:36 AM »
Be sure to measure diagonally across the arm for an accurate measure!!
Logged

Dipadidu

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
  • any problems? work out!
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2006, 01:49:07 AM »
be sure you lost 100pounds of fat before
Logged

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2006, 01:50:47 AM »
Quote from: db2431 on November 22, 2006, 12:12:36 AM
Be sure to measure diagonally across the arm for an accurate measure!!

14" arms jealousy Meltdown.
Logged

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13693
  • Serenity Now!
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2006, 02:08:43 AM »
Quote from: db2431 on November 22, 2006, 12:12:36 AM
Be sure to measure diagonally across the arm for an accurate measure!!


Obscene shaved armpit with the stubble regrowth.
Logged
P

gtbro1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2006, 02:52:34 AM »
 photo shopped.
Logged

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9909
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2006, 03:32:15 AM »
synthol
Logged

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2006, 03:43:59 AM »
And the point of this thread is what exactly?  ???
Logged

sandycoosworth

  • Guest
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2006, 04:32:30 AM »
LOL, that is one fat fucking arm ;D
Logged

dan18

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7307
  • I DID WHAT I DID BECAUSE I DO WHAT I WANT.
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2006, 05:01:35 AM »
and dont forget to clip the tape in the back so it appears that you have a big arm...
Logged
p

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2006, 05:05:59 AM »
Fats.
Logged

Playboy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11318
  • If the bar ain't bending, you're just pretending
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2006, 05:17:36 AM »
Quote from: BigJ on November 22, 2006, 03:43:59 AM
And the point of this thread is what exactly?  ???
You took the words right out of my mouth.

PB
Logged

HUGEPECS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4061
  • School of Hard knocks Gym
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #11 on: November 22, 2006, 05:54:08 AM »
I would say 13inch minus all the fat
Logged
Get Big, or Die Trying

body88

  • Guest
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #12 on: November 22, 2006, 06:25:42 AM »
cut the fat homes!!!!! Your arms would still be about 17 1/2 inches which is pretty big for a natty. A lean 18 inch arm is gigantic. I know few nattys that sport lean 18's.
Logged

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #13 on: November 22, 2006, 08:26:19 AM »
It isnt me, its Alex23 who claims to be 16%Bf hahah monster delusions.
Logged

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #14 on: November 22, 2006, 09:09:30 AM »
No definition or vascularity to speak of.   
Logged

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2006, 09:12:18 AM »
Quote from: db2431 on November 22, 2006, 12:12:36 AM
Be sure to measure diagonally across the arm for an accurate measure!!

i don't think so this pic is real..but if its real, man your arms have awesome size..so are they 21inches or what
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #16 on: November 22, 2006, 11:54:00 AM »
Quote from: db2431 on November 22, 2006, 08:26:19 AM
It isnt me, its Alex23 who claims to be 16%Bf hahah monster delusions.


Epic Obession on my case.... 19" cold still not too bad for a natural... you all wish mother fuckers... 8)
Logged

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #17 on: November 22, 2006, 12:40:51 PM »
Quote from: Alex23 on November 22, 2006, 11:54:00 AM

Epic Obession on my case.... 19" cold still not too bad for a natural... you all wish mother fuckers... 8)

If I was as ugly as you I'd shoot myself.
Logged

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #18 on: November 22, 2006, 03:47:48 PM »
Quote from: Captain Equipoise on November 22, 2006, 12:40:51 PM
If I was as ugly as you I'd shoot myself.


Meltdown.
Logged

flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #19 on: November 22, 2006, 04:51:28 PM »
Quote from: Alex23 on November 22, 2006, 03:47:48 PM
Meltdown.

Monster self obession Alex23!
Logged

Debussey

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2707
  • The shadow braggs about hitting women
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2006, 04:56:16 PM »
Quote from: Alex23 on November 22, 2006, 03:47:48 PM
Meltdown.

When you diet down, your looks will brutally change.
Logged
Support DEBUSSEYWORLD!

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #21 on: November 22, 2006, 04:57:46 PM »
Quote from: Debussey on November 22, 2006, 04:56:16 PM
When you diet down, your looks will brutally change.

Everybody is hoping for it Debussey, including my detractors 8)
Logged

luv2build

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
  • Getbig!
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #22 on: November 22, 2006, 04:58:38 PM »
Quote from: Alex23 on November 22, 2006, 11:54:00 AM

Epic Obession on my case.... 19" cold still not too bad for a natural... you all wish mother fuckers... 8)

Except the tape isn't quite at 19 about another millimeter before you can lay the legit claim ;D
Logged

gtbro1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #23 on: November 23, 2006, 01:21:32 AM »
Quote from: Alex23 on November 22, 2006, 11:54:00 AM

Epic Obession on my case.... 19" cold still not too bad for a natural... you all wish mother fuckers... 8)

  Your 42 inch waste sort of takes away from it don't ya think?
Logged

siouxcountry

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1669
  • Team Ripitupbaby!
Re: The Scientific Standard In Measuring Arm Size
« Reply #24 on: November 23, 2006, 03:42:30 AM »
Quote from: the shadow on November 22, 2006, 09:12:18 AM
i don't think so this pic is real..but if its real, man your arms have awesome size..so are they 21inches or what

LOL Shadow, if you are serious look at the photo again. Now use a few brain cells, good luck!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »