Author Topic: More reasons why Nordic's "England" is in trouble  (Read 790 times)

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
More reasons why Nordic's "England" is in trouble
« on: November 28, 2006, 03:01:06 AM »
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/cm/main/printArticle.aip?article=com.commentarymagazine.content.Article::10137


Its an editorial about how the muslims are taking over London. It further states that London is the unofficial capital of muslim Europe. Here is some of the more interesting bits. I love England..this is horrible. With the killing of Van Gogh in Holland, that government made sweeping reforms. U would think after the subway bombings they would have backed up the moving vans and deported all these people. The Brits better wake up..they would not be taking this crap from the Irish.




"The second incident took place not far from the Jewish cemetery at Mile End with which I began. In mid-September, soon after Blair set a date for his departure, Home Secretary John Reid came to the East End to talk to a Muslim audience. His message was an unpalatable one: your sons and daughters, he said, are in danger of being “groomed” to become suicide bombers. If you are worried about this, tell the police.

One member of the audience, a Jamaican convert to Islam who calls himself Abu Izzadeen, interrupted the minister: “How dare you come to a Muslim area?” Impressed by the highly articulate Abu Izzadeen, the BBC promptly invited him to appear on its flagship Today program. Millions listened as he denounced Reid as a “murderer” and Blair as “an enemy to Muslims and an enemy to Allah.” Dismissing democracy and free speech, Abu Izzadeen declared that Britain “doesn’t belong to you, or to the Queen, or to the government, but to Allah. He has put us on earth to implement shari’a law.”

The BBC’s toughest interviewer, John Humph-reys, was speechless. So were many others—but with rage. Opinion polls showed that Reid, already a hero for his role in uncovering the transatlantic bomb plot and Blair’s most loyal lieutenant, was suddenly the most popular candidate to succeed him. Like Nicolas Sarkozy, his counterpart in France, Reid is seen as tough on terror and tough on the causes of terror. If, faced with the terrifying prospect represented by the likes of Abu Izzadeen, the British are perhaps not so sure that Cameron-style “humility” is quite what they want, that is good news.

Indeed, Abu Izzadeen’s attempt to claim the East End as an exclusively “Muslim area” may not be mere fantasy. In 2012, the East End will host the Olympics. Waiting to be built, in a spot adjacent to the Olympic village, is the largest place of worship in Europe: the London Markaz, part of a vast complex projected to cost £100 million, most of it coming from Saudi Arabia. The organizational backer for this project is Tablighi Jamaat, a Muslim missionary group that the FBI has labeled a recruiting ground for al Qaeda.

London, with over 1,000 mosques, is already Europe’s unofficial Muslim capital. Its status will be enhanced immeasurably by the Markaz, whose size—it is projected to hold 70,000 worshippers—will dwarf St. Paul’s Cathedral and Westminster Abbey. To contemplate the building of so potent a symbol of Islamic triumphalism over Europe’s Christian heritage is all but incredible.

Will it happen? Britain today is a nation torn between defiance and appeasement, led by a political elite that with few exceptions seems to be intimidated by Islam and reluctant to address—when it is not complicit in—anti-Semitism. The British people are not lost to the West, but the battle to preserve liberty in their country is only just beginning. Which makes it all the more fitting that the immediate battleground should be the East End, the place where so much began in the days when Cromwell’s Latin secretary, John Milton, was writing Areopagitica, his great defense of free speech, and when Menasseh ben Israel was pleading successfully for Jews to be treated with toleration.

Unlike too many other Jewish graveyards in Europe, Mile End has not been desecrated. Not yet."
L

Nordic Superman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
  • Hesitation doesn't come easily in this blood...
Re: More reasons why Nordic's "England" is in trouble
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2006, 03:27:48 AM »
Wow, nice article. Cheers.

It's no longer in trouble, it's future is now set in stone because the tip over the edge has been made. There is no coming back for England.
الاسلام هو شيطانية

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: More reasons why Nordic's "England" is in trouble
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2006, 03:39:22 AM »
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/cm/main/printArticle.aip?article=com.commentarymagazine.content.Article::10137


Its an editorial about how the muslims are taking over London. It further states that London is the unofficial capital of muslim Europe. Here is some of the more interesting bits. I love England..this is horrible. With the killing of Van Gogh in Holland, that government made sweeping reforms. U would think after the subway bombings they would have backed up the moving vans and deported all these people. The Brits better wake up..they would not be taking this crap from the Irish.




"The second incident took place not far from the Jewish cemetery at Mile End with which I began. In mid-September, soon after Blair set a date for his departure, Home Secretary John Reid came to the East End to talk to a Muslim audience. His message was an unpalatable one: your sons and daughters, he said, are in danger of being “groomed” to become suicide bombers. If you are worried about this, tell the police.

One member of the audience, a Jamaican convert to Islam who calls himself Abu Izzadeen, interrupted the minister: “How dare you come to a Muslim area?” Impressed by the highly articulate Abu Izzadeen, the BBC promptly invited him to appear on its flagship Today program. Millions listened as he denounced Reid as a “murderer” and Blair as “an enemy to Muslims and an enemy to Allah.” Dismissing democracy and free speech, Abu Izzadeen declared that Britain “doesn’t belong to you, or to the Queen, or to the government, but to Allah. He has put us on earth to implement shari’a law.”

The BBC’s toughest interviewer, John Humph-reys, was speechless. So were many others—but with rage. Opinion polls showed that Reid, already a hero for his role in uncovering the transatlantic bomb plot and Blair’s most loyal lieutenant, was suddenly the most popular candidate to succeed him. Like Nicolas Sarkozy, his counterpart in France, Reid is seen as tough on terror and tough on the causes of terror. If, faced with the terrifying prospect represented by the likes of Abu Izzadeen, the British are perhaps not so sure that Cameron-style “humility” is quite what they want, that is good news.

Indeed, Abu Izzadeen’s attempt to claim the East End as an exclusively “Muslim area” may not be mere fantasy. In 2012, the East End will host the Olympics. Waiting to be built, in a spot adjacent to the Olympic village, is the largest place of worship in Europe: the London Markaz, part of a vast complex projected to cost £100 million, most of it coming from Saudi Arabia. The organizational backer for this project is Tablighi Jamaat, a Muslim missionary group that the FBI has labeled a recruiting ground for al Qaeda.

London, with over 1,000 mosques, is already Europe’s unofficial Muslim capital. Its status will be enhanced immeasurably by the Markaz, whose size—it is projected to hold 70,000 worshippers—will dwarf St. Paul’s Cathedral and Westminster Abbey. To contemplate the building of so potent a symbol of Islamic triumphalism over Europe’s Christian heritage is all but incredible.

Will it happen? Britain today is a nation torn between defiance and appeasement, led by a political elite that with few exceptions seems to be intimidated by Islam and reluctant to address—when it is not complicit in—anti-Semitism. The British people are not lost to the West, but the battle to preserve liberty in their country is only just beginning. Which makes it all the more fitting that the immediate battleground should be the East End, the place where so much began in the days when Cromwell’s Latin secretary, John Milton, was writing Areopagitica, his great defense of free speech, and when Menasseh ben Israel was pleading successfully for Jews to be treated with toleration.

Unlike too many other Jewish graveyards in Europe, Mile End has not been desecrated. Not yet."

That's scary.  :-\

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: More reasons why Nordic's "England" is in trouble
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2006, 04:35:37 AM »
Nordic's England  ??? AHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHA HHHHAHAHAHAHAHHhhahhhahh ahahahaha....





Oh Oh Ohio............. ;D

Diesel1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6261
Re: More reasons why Nordic's "England" is in trouble
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2006, 04:37:16 AM »
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/cm/main/printArticle.aip?article=com.commentarymagazine.content.Article::10137


Its an editorial about how the muslims are taking over London. It further states that London is the unofficial capital of muslim Europe. Here is some of the more interesting bits. I love England..this is horrible. With the killing of Van Gogh in Holland, that government made sweeping reforms. U would think after the subway bombings they would have backed up the moving vans and deported all these people. The Brits better wake up..they would not be taking this crap from the Irish.




"The second incident took place not far from the Jewish cemetery at Mile End with which I began. In mid-September, soon after Blair set a date for his departure, Home Secretary John Reid came to the East End to talk to a Muslim audience. His message was an unpalatable one: your sons and daughters, he said, are in danger of being “groomed” to become suicide bombers. If you are worried about this, tell the police.

One member of the audience, a Jamaican convert to Islam who calls himself Abu Izzadeen, interrupted the minister: “How dare you come to a Muslim area?” Impressed by the highly articulate Abu Izzadeen, the BBC promptly invited him to appear on its flagship Today program. Millions listened as he denounced Reid as a “murderer” and Blair as “an enemy to Muslims and an enemy to Allah.” Dismissing democracy and free speech, Abu Izzadeen declared that Britain “doesn’t belong to you, or to the Queen, or to the government, but to Allah. He has put us on earth to implement shari’a law.”

The BBC’s toughest interviewer, John Humph-reys, was speechless. So were many others—but with rage. Opinion polls showed that Reid, already a hero for his role in uncovering the transatlantic bomb plot and Blair’s most loyal lieutenant, was suddenly the most popular candidate to succeed him. Like Nicolas Sarkozy, his counterpart in France, Reid is seen as tough on terror and tough on the causes of terror. If, faced with the terrifying prospect represented by the likes of Abu Izzadeen, the British are perhaps not so sure that Cameron-style “humility” is quite what they want, that is good news.

Indeed, Abu Izzadeen’s attempt to claim the East End as an exclusively “Muslim area” may not be mere fantasy. In 2012, the East End will host the Olympics. Waiting to be built, in a spot adjacent to the Olympic village, is the largest place of worship in Europe: the London Markaz, part of a vast complex projected to cost £100 million, most of it coming from Saudi Arabia. The organizational backer for this project is Tablighi Jamaat, a Muslim missionary group that the FBI has labeled a recruiting ground for al Qaeda.

London, with over 1,000 mosques, is already Europe’s unofficial Muslim capital. Its status will be enhanced immeasurably by the Markaz, whose size—it is projected to hold 70,000 worshippers—will dwarf St. Paul’s Cathedral and Westminster Abbey. To contemplate the building of so potent a symbol of Islamic triumphalism over Europe’s Christian heritage is all but incredible.

Will it happen? Britain today is a nation torn between defiance and appeasement, led by a political elite that with few exceptions seems to be intimidated by Islam and reluctant to address—when it is not complicit in—anti-Semitism. The British people are not lost to the West, but the battle to preserve liberty in their country is only just beginning. Which makes it all the more fitting that the immediate battleground should be the East End, the place where so much began in the days when Cromwell’s Latin secretary, John Milton, was writing Areopagitica, his great defense of free speech, and when Menasseh ben Israel was pleading successfully for Jews to be treated with toleration.

Unlike too many other Jewish graveyards in Europe, Mile End has not been desecrated. Not yet."

The Abu Izzadeen thing was a complete and utter set up.

Regarding the mosque, you can blame 'Red Ken' for that

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: More reasons why Nordic's "England" is in trouble
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2006, 04:54:53 AM »
Explain set-up. That was what prompted me to post it. I can't imagine anything so blatent being showed on NBC/CNN/FOX etc. Especially seeing the problems they are having with the muslims. Hey Beserk aren't u in Montana..u can talk shit for years before anything happens there. I bet there aren't 10 muslims in the whole state. Must be nice :P
L

Diesel1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6261
Re: More reasons why Nordic's "England" is in trouble
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2006, 05:17:48 AM »
Explain set-up. That was what prompted me to post it. I can't imagine anything so blatent being showed on NBC/CNN/FOX etc. Especially seeing the problems they are having with the muslims. Hey Beserk aren't u in Montana..u can talk shit for years before anything happens there. I bet there aren't 10 muslims in the whole state. Must be nice :P

John Reid is the Home Secretary which is the 3rd most important seat in government, so you would imagine that security would have been fairly high, which it was by all accounts.

Abu Izzadeen is very well known to the security forces and the media as a radical muslim. There was no way on earth that he and his cronies were gonna just be able to walk into that meeting which was by invitation only. It turned out that Abu Izzadeen was infact invited to that meeting and he duly lived up to expectations when he went on his little rant

Diesel1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6261

Nordic Superman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
  • Hesitation doesn't come easily in this blood...
Re: More reasons why Nordic's "England" is in trouble
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2006, 05:52:10 AM »
Real Media format? The BBC are fucking communists! >:(
الاسلام هو شيطانية