Not true.
I've done the blood test in the lab (the joy of easyaccess ).
6 weeks of test blend (enanthate week1-4 + prop 1-6), then estrogen/cortisol control week 7-12.
Week 7, estradiol levels were sligtly bellow normal, same result on week 13. Couldn't measure circulating cortisol accurately but no catabolism, and almost no weight loss.
Aromasin was used week 1-10,
HCG week 7-10 (500IU 4xday, week 1, after, 500IU e3d)
Albuterol week 7,8, 10,11 (cortisol supression)
I gained 15lb, from 225 to 240 on week6. By week 12 I was down to 235 with BF of about 10-11%, didn't measure initial BF but was higher by at least a couple of points. Then Ready for 12 weeks contest prep.
It's not that I don't believe you, but I know my body and I just can't see making any permanent gains off this type of protocol, given my experience with longer cycles.
I think the hormonal fluctuations alone would wreak havoc on the system.
If you couldn't measure cortisol levels, how do you know there was no catabolism?
Weight loss doesn't mean much, it's the body composition that matters.
That's true. But with ALR's protocols, by day 60, you've recovered and ready to get back into max androgen phase. This way you can easily cycle 6 months out of the year (in a row) with low risk of highs and crashes...
I've read Author's book and even e-mailed him. He's an interesting cat, but I'm not sold on his theories. They make work for some genetic types, but they won't work on everyone, at least not how they are designed to.
Author L. Rea reminds me of Dan Duchaine....
An innovative mind, but very risky and avant garde when it comes to AAS and other drugs.
Dan was right about alot of things, but also wrong about a great many things as well.....
DIV