Author Topic: who was better in thier primes ?  (Read 10001 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83431
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #50 on: December 03, 2006, 04:58:09 PM »
I think what ND's saying is that he works for Bowflex-PM him for details. He's quite obviously as obsessed with them as he is attracted to pump. hahahahahaahahahahh


ND's pumpster obsession continues...


I own you  ;) and why are you ashamed of your Bow Flex? lol

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83431
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #51 on: December 03, 2006, 05:02:59 PM »
Kevin owning Ronnie in the sidechest

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #52 on: December 03, 2006, 05:04:11 PM »
Levrone was robbed by the garbage can known as Coleman - 2000 and 2002. What a sham

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83431
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #53 on: December 03, 2006, 05:04:18 PM »
Flex 1993

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83431
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #54 on: December 03, 2006, 05:04:55 PM »
Levrone was robbed by the garbage can known as Coleman - 2000 and 2002. What a sham

2002 the crow wouldn't stop Booing when Ronnie was being awarded the first place medal !!

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #55 on: December 03, 2006, 05:05:35 PM »
Levrone was robbed by the garbage can known as Coleman - 2000 and 2002. What a sham

Moreso competing against Yates, both Wheeler & Levrone:

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83431
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #56 on: December 03, 2006, 05:07:47 PM »
I heard Kev tore his pec doing 410 pounds bench presses on the Bow Flex for 15 full consecutive reps  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83431
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #57 on: December 03, 2006, 05:09:24 PM »
Kevin looking massive

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #58 on: December 03, 2006, 05:17:38 PM »
Kevin owning Ronnie in the sidechest

and Ronnie owning kevin in the entire upper body

 8)

Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83431
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #59 on: December 03, 2006, 05:20:16 PM »
and Ronnie owning kevin in the entire upper body

 8)



I'm afraid not about equal on size and kevin has a tighter midsecton  ;)

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #60 on: December 03, 2006, 05:29:48 PM »
Then you haven't seen all of Shadows posts, you judgemental naive twit. Take a break from your demonstrated need to criticize, stay on topic & look around at some of the other posts. Maybe it's the trolls like you who don't recognize it in others like Shadow.

all you do in the truce thread is say everyone lacks credibility if thier opinion differs from yours, this thread is no different.  You're the most judgemental twit on this board, bar none.

as to why I would pick levrone:  First off, Levrone always brought it when it mattered, while his rookie year was not as impressive as Flex's it was still awsome.  3rd at the chicago show to Patel and Cotrel were the only blemishes.  He looked fantastic at the olympia at least as good as he was when he won the NOC.  Flex on the other hand slipped a little when it mattered and didn't show up at the O looking as good as he did in the spring shows.  Kevin came back from his pec tear and won the Arnold while Flex came back and from his auto accident and had-by his standards a terrible year finishing in the runner up spot at the arnold and then getting 8th at the 95 O.  kevin beat flex at the 96 Arnold by coming in totally huge and just out muscling him.  Kevin was the last guy to beat Ronnie before he won his first O and competed well up until 02, his pro career was longer and he won more shows, he also has more runner up spots at the O than Flex did and I don't hear many people saying kevin was great but he was just to lazy to maximize his body like they say about Flex.  Flex also depended too much on synthol towards the end of his career.  That's why I pic Kevin.
nasser=piece of shit

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #61 on: December 03, 2006, 05:41:06 PM »
I'm afraid not about equal on size and kevin has a tighter midsecton  ;)

equal on size but what about everything else?

if there is one shot where ronnie is owing kevin, its that one!

give Ronnie credit where credit is due!
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #62 on: December 03, 2006, 05:42:29 PM »


as to why I would pick levrone:  First off, Levrone always brought it when it mattered, while his rookie year was not as impressive as Flex's it was still awsome.  3rd at the chicago show to Patel and Cotrel were the only blemishes.  He looked fantastic at the olympia at least as good as he was when he won the NOC.  Flex on the other hand slipped a little when it mattered and didn't show up at the O looking as good as he did in the spring shows.  Kevin came back from his pec tear and won the Arnold while Flex came back and from his auto accident and had-by his standards a terrible year finishing in the runner up spot at the arnold and then getting 8th at the 95 O.  kevin beat flex at the 96 Arnold by coming in totally huge and just out muscling him.  Kevin was the last guy to beat Ronnie before he won his first O and competed well up until 02, his pro career was longer and he won more shows, he also has more runner up spots at the O than Flex did and I don't hear many people saying kevin was great but he was just to lazy to maximize his body like they say about Flex.  Flex also depended too much on synthol towards the end of his career.  That's why I pic Kevin.

I agree with all this.

Kevin bouned back strong from adversity.

Flex never really did and never seemed to pull it together for the really big shows.

He peaks for every ironman under the sun but couldn't really do it for even a single Olympia... :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83431
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #63 on: December 03, 2006, 05:43:41 PM »
equal on size but what about everything else?

if there is one shot where ronnie is owing kevin, its that one!

give Ronnie credit where credit is due!

Seriously they are closely matched in that pose and Kevin has the better midsection , seriously.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #64 on: December 03, 2006, 05:50:01 PM »
ND, they would be closely matched in that pose if you cut off both of their arms ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

figgs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • from realization to infinity
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #65 on: December 03, 2006, 06:15:09 PM »
I really think Kevin is superior. He's a mass monster but has as much aesthetics as a mass monster can possibly have. He has a powerful, Herculean physique and perfect athletic genetics.

Flex was good but he was narrow and was as motivated as a lump of shit. He had a better stage presence but had nowhere near as much mass as Levrone. He had a great aesthetic, Apoleonic physique but was a pathetic man.

TWENTY FOUR INCH ARMS!!!!
~

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #66 on: December 03, 2006, 06:41:44 PM »
LOL did kevin actually claim 24 inch arms?

Hell, Ronnie in 2003 at 287 pounds did not have arms that big onstage!
Flower Boy Ran Away

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #67 on: December 03, 2006, 07:23:22 PM »
I agree with all this.

Kevin bouned back strong from adversity.

Flex never really did and never seemed to pull it together for the really big shows.

He peaks for every ironman under the sun but couldn't really do it for even a single Olympia... :-\

flex won the 95 ironman and the show before it, which I think was the south beach pro beating a vastly superior Aaron Baker who was still paying for his wBF strint...Aaron should have beat flex soundly in both of those shows and to put an out of shape and small flex over Labrada at his last show at the arnold was a trevesty, I do think Flex looked great at the 96 NOC but again he slipped come olympia time.
nasser=piece of shit

Croatch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
  • Man up, train natural.
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #68 on: December 03, 2006, 08:17:36 PM »
Their.  E before I.
This one is on me.  Next one I'm going to charge.
N

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #69 on: December 03, 2006, 08:37:33 PM »
all you do in the truce thread is say everyone lacks credibility if thier opinion differs from yours, this thread is no different.  You're the most judgemental twit on this board, bar none.

as to why I would pick levrone:  First off, Levrone always brought it when it mattered, while his rookie year was not as impressive as Flex's it was still awsome.  3rd at the chicago show to Patel and Cotrel were the only blemishes.  He looked fantastic at the olympia at least as good as he was when he won the NOC.  Flex on the other hand slipped a little when it mattered and didn't show up at the O looking as good as he did in the spring shows.  Kevin came back from his pec tear and won the Arnold while Flex came back and from his auto accident and had-by his standards a terrible year finishing in the runner up spot at the arnold and then getting 8th at the 95 O.  kevin beat flex at the 96 Arnold by coming in totally huge and just out muscling him.  Kevin was the last guy to beat Ronnie before he won his first O and competed well up until 02, his pro career was longer and he won more shows, he also has more runner up spots at the O than Flex did and I don't hear many people saying kevin was great but he was just to lazy to maximize his body like they say about Flex.  Flex also depended too much on synthol towards the end of his career.  That's why I pic Kevin.

You've just proved that i was right about you; it took hitting a nerve about your vindictive, empty, no-nothing posts including something useless like defending Shadow, to finally motivate your ass to say something.

Stick to the subject. Don't spend so much time on me, your overt hatred makes you look like a friggin idiot. Your obsession on the comments of someone you don't even know looks pathetic dude. ;D

americanbulldog

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2681
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #70 on: December 03, 2006, 11:32:24 PM »
Wheeler was the 2nd best BB of the last 2 decades, ahead of Haney & Yates. Going only on numbers of contests is fairly irrelevant.

Levrone great but more flawed. Couldn't match overall balance & aesthetics like this:

Better of the two for each person's career.  Levrone.  Best physique at one particular show.  Wheeler.  93 Arnold was SICK!

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #71 on: December 03, 2006, 11:36:51 PM »
Wheeler looked better IMO.
TEAM REPTILIAN

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83431
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #72 on: December 04, 2006, 12:29:10 AM »
You've just proved that i was right about you; it took hitting a nerve about your vindictive, empty, no-nothing posts including something useless like defending Shadow, to finally motivate your ass to say something.

Stick to the subject. Don't spend so much time on me, your overt hatred makes you look like a friggin idiot. Your obsession on the comments of someone you don't even know looks pathetic dude. ;D

Again you're the pot calling the kettle black , you make wild claims of an absurd nature and when called on them you revert to name calling and posting the same pictures over and over . you have no content in any of your posts just empty filler you're deathly afraid of an honest debate because you can't stand toe-to-toe on an intellectual level

Whats ironic is you have the balls to say " Stick to the subject " and in your very first post you had to throw in the comment that Flex was better than Haney & Yates , which is exactly NOT sticking to the topic which was who was better at their prime Flex or Kevin , heed your own advice  ;)

You claim Kevin couldn't handle Flex's balance and aesthetics , let me clue you in on something Flex doesn't have great balance , although I agree at his best he would beat Kevin it wouldn't be on balance , and Kevin at his best had an aesthetic physique combined with a lot of size , you're afraid to elaborate on your opinion for a reason because you can't , because you have a limited ability of competitive bodybuilding comprehension

Whats funny is this applies in almost every topic you post on , you make a ridiculous claim and when pressed for an explanation of your opinion , you start name calling or claiming the other person has no credibility , this is a diversionary tactic on your part and then you're reduced to what you know best name calling , and everyone who has pressed you on your opinions all come to the same conclusion , you don't know anything.  ;)

MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #73 on: December 04, 2006, 04:01:53 AM »
honestly why is it that anyone who sees things different from you have no credibility in your eyes?  You're credibility is in question because you're so close minded.

Yes he is such a dick when it comes to shit like that, if you don't see things from his point of view you are stupid and blind to the "truth". He loves to talk about everyone elses lack of credibility when he doesn't see eye to eye with them and uses double standards to the max, his debating skills also seem to blow massive amounts of cock for the same reason.
I

MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #74 on: December 04, 2006, 04:15:06 AM »
Flex was good but couldn't peak when it really mattered and eventually turned into a joke because of the synthol and ninjas. Kevin seemed to peak for just about every show he did but later in his career he like flex went downhill but not to quite the same extent. Comparing them both in their prime of the mid to late 90's I would say I prefer Kevin's overall look and presentation but it could go either way based mostly on personal opinion but like I said I think Kev had the more complete package which is the look I prefer.
I