Author Topic: who was better in thier primes ?  (Read 9937 times)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #75 on: December 04, 2006, 05:16:25 AM »
Yes he is such a dick when it comes to shit like that, if you don't see things from his point of view you are stupid and blind to the "truth". He loves to talk about everyone elses lack of credibility when he doesn't see eye to eye with them and uses double standards to the max, his debating skills also seem to blow massive amounts of cock for the same reason.

The wisdom of 21-year old Mikethamachine, a true BB veteran.hahaahahahaahaha hahaahahahah

MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #76 on: December 04, 2006, 05:20:15 AM »
The wisdom of 21-year old Mikethamachine, a true BB veteran.hahaahahahaahaha hahaahahahah

Just for the record I have never in my life worked out on a Bowflex, I hope that puts my BBing knowledge in perpesctive with your own.
I

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #77 on: December 04, 2006, 05:25:53 AM »
Just for the record I have never in my life worked out on a Bowflex, I hope that puts my BBing knowledge in perpesctive with your own.

Just for the record you're a kid with minimal BB knowledge and even less ability to spell. I smell GED. hahahaahahah

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #78 on: December 04, 2006, 05:27:13 AM »
Just for the record you're a kid with minimal BB knowledge and even less ability to spell. I smell GED. hahahaahahah

thanks for proving my point about you.
nasser=piece of shit

MikeThaMachine

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5994
  • WTF Happened, BBing Is Dead. I Didn't Miss A Thing
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #79 on: December 04, 2006, 05:28:12 AM »
Just for the record you're a kid with minimal BB knowledge and even less ability to spell. I smell GED. hahahaahahah

Oh my god I misspelled a word, I must be a total fucking retard, I will never amount to anything now ::)
I

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #80 on: December 04, 2006, 05:29:34 AM »
Oh my god I misspelled a word, I must be a total fucking retard, I will never amount to anything now ::)

Try something new. STFU and discuss the thread; don't worry about me, kid. ;)

Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #81 on: December 04, 2006, 05:36:16 AM »


Ronnie is winning here with superior detail and separation, with the added appearance of fullness, size and hardness.



Not here though, when is this from? 2002? Ronnie is getting schooled.

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #82 on: December 04, 2006, 05:47:57 AM »
kEVIN is crushing Ronnie in that side chest pose...I still don't think Ronnie hits the majority of his madatories right and this is a good example of that.
nasser=piece of shit

bigkubby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2837
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #83 on: December 04, 2006, 07:30:32 AM »
kevin packs more heat in the trunks lol thats what the judges stare at.
i

carvedoutofwood

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
  • the flame of the west
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #84 on: December 04, 2006, 07:42:18 AM »
kEVIN is crushing Ronnie in that side chest pose...I still don't think Ronnie hits the majority of his madatories right and this is a good example of that.
'

i think ronnies side shots are a weakness.. however from every other angle ronnie is incredible.... the problem with Levrone always was that he's NARROW... you cant chane that... cept from the side, from the side you can hide it... phil health is the same way... thast why flex houses levrone.... width... flex had it, levrone didnt

carvedoutofwood

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
  • the flame of the west
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #85 on: December 04, 2006, 07:50:09 AM »
Levrone.

Flex may have had a better structure (balance and proportions), but Kevin had the superior ability to gain muscle mass and he wasn't exactly a slouch as far as shape goes.  Some on here don't seem to give enough credit to muscle mass.  Kevin was far ahead of Flex in this manner.  He didn't need to juice as long and he would end up much bigger than Flex.  Flex on the other hand, had to resort to synthol and implants.  That should count for something when making this comparison - and not in a good way.

however the reality is that Flex never had implants and nobody cares "how long" of gearing up it takes for someone to get big... when u step onstage you are as you are... then there are mandatory poses... kevin wins the two side poses and loses everything else... especially from the back kevin couldnt compete with flex... so the only thing tha "Should count" is what someon looks like when they step onstage... Flex is exactly what this sport wasw built on...

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #86 on: December 04, 2006, 07:53:38 AM »

  Some on here don't seem to give enough credit to muscle mass.  Kevin was far ahead of Flex in this manner.  He didn't need to juice as long and he would end up much bigger than Flex. 
Relatively to structure, Wheeler was just as big, with less flaws and better structure. Levrone's narrowness is exactly why he looks like a million sometimes, which is misleading after seeing other poses. Wheeler's implants weren't a good idea but aside from that what he had already was great.


Quote
i think ronnies side shots are a weakness..
Why? Haven't heard it from anyone else.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #87 on: December 04, 2006, 02:35:49 PM »
Quote
i think ronnies side shots are a weakness

I don't think so


look at the arms, the quads, the chest...although kevins might be better overall, ronnie's holds up well.

Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #88 on: December 04, 2006, 03:05:57 PM »
I don't think so


look at the arms, the quads, the chest...although kevins might be better overall, ronnie's holds up well.



His side chest leaves a lot to be desired , the irony is he has a fabulous chest but you can't tell , his side chest pose as a whole leaves a lot to be desired , his front & side delts obscure the chest and make it appear small he doesn't pull his chest back , you can see his gut peeking out and his calves really , really disappear from the side and forget about the oversized quads making them look even smaller.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #89 on: December 04, 2006, 03:40:07 PM »
Coleman's got one of the very best all-time side shots in BB history, as evidenced by this mismatch. Yates looking no more than mediocre:

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #90 on: December 04, 2006, 03:41:10 PM »

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #91 on: December 04, 2006, 03:45:56 PM »
Coleman's got one of the very best all-time side shots in BB history, as evidenced by this mismatch. Yates looking no more than mediocre:

Another weak and tired comparison from pumpster thats Dorian 1997 NOT his best by any stretch you fear a great picture of Dorian for a reason  ;) and what happened to sticking to the topic ? heed your own advice sport.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #92 on: December 04, 2006, 03:50:01 PM »
ND HAS no choice but to go with B&W shots, because Yates' definition suffers in color. ;D

Here are some direct contest comparisons:


Same conclusion (Yates' arms looking small).. ;D

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #93 on: December 04, 2006, 03:51:28 PM »
ND HAS no choice but to go with B&W shots, because Yates' definition suffers in color. ;D

Here are some direct contest comparisons, Coleman dominating once again:


Again stick to the topic slick , you want this comparison take it to the truce thread , stick to the topic.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #94 on: December 04, 2006, 03:52:18 PM »

Again stick to the topic slick , you want this comparison take it to the truce thread , stick to the topic.

U first kid.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83428
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #95 on: December 04, 2006, 03:59:07 PM »
U first kid.

I was first and I said Flex and that was it , you added Yates & Haney into the equation and then have the balls to tell someone else to stick to the topic lol kid go away , either get in the game or sit on the sidelines.

Levrone was one of the few modern bodybuilder who could effectively pull off twisting 3/4 shots.

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #96 on: December 04, 2006, 08:01:11 PM »
Flex before the 1999 Mr Olympia and fuggin HUGE



Looks like Jay onstage  ;D
TEAM REPTILIAN

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
TEAM REPTILIAN

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #98 on: December 04, 2006, 08:17:06 PM »
Rhetorical.
TEAM REPTILIAN

realkarateblackbelt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Numero UNO!!!!!!!
Re: who was better in thier primes ?
« Reply #99 on: December 04, 2006, 08:19:25 PM »
yawn.
TEAM REPTILIAN