Whats That? Ronnie Way Bigger Than Dorian???

[pobrecito]

yeah right. put that same ronnie shot in great lighting like dorian's shot and its game over.

notice if you look closely you can see every detail in that shot as you can in the 99 contest shots.

its all there.

It's no surprise, you come up with yet another excuse.

[Hulkster]

It's no surprise, you come up with yet another excuse.

its not an excuse you retard. its an observation.

that shot of Ronnie is from a guest posing exhibition with lighting so bad you can barely see anything. and yet if you look close you can still see vascularity and lots of detail in his pecs delts and arms.


put this contest shot against dorian's side contest shot and see how well he does

[pumpster]

'93 Yates & '06 Coleman's close. 

[pobrecito]

its not an excuse you retard. its an observation.

that shot of Ronnie is from a guest posing exhibition with lighting so bad you can barely see anything. and yet if you look close you can still see vascularity and lots of detail in his pecs delts and arms.


put this contest shot against dorian's side contest shot and see how well he does

No need to get hostile hulkster. If I recall correctly, you were the one who posted that picture for me to put in the comparison, and now you scold me for it

[NarcissisticDeity]

its not an excuse you retard. its an observation.

that shot of Ronnie is from a guest posing exhibition with lighting so bad you can barely see anything. and yet if you look close you can still see vascularity and lots of detail in his pecs delts and arms.


put this contest shot against dorian's side contest shot and see how well he does

Hulkster you are the last and I mean absolute last person who ever has a right to complain about comparing bad pictures seriously , you perfected this ' tool ' well before the truce thread ever started , you posted a picture of a 228 pound Dorian and a 260 pound Ronnie doing pull ups and the proceeded to claim that Ronnie owns him in the back  seriously man you complaining about that is off-limits.

[suckmymuscle]

the pics support my opinion.

they do not support yours except for the two areas that I mentioned, which isn't much..

  You made the assertion that Ronnie 1999 carried as much mass as Dorian, and the bottom line is that you failed utterly to substantiate that. My contention is that odds are that Dorian carried more mass. Even if their frames were of equal weights, Dorian woulds still carry the most mass.

  Now, you argued that Dorian wasn't drier than Ronnie. Since you said that as prima fasce evidence that Ronnie carried as much mass as Dorian, and since your entire argument is based on this assumption, I expect you to prove it. Based on visual evidence, it is clear that Dorian was drier overrall. Youa rgue that he's only drier in the lower back and abs. Ok: prove it. Odds are that Dorian was drier overrall, and this would prove that my contention is correct.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[Hulkster]

Youa rgue that he's only drier in the lower back and abs. Ok: prove it.

gladly:

lets start at the top:

who has drier arms?

Ronnie easily. everyone can see that:

[NarcissisticDeity]

gladly:

lets start at the top:

who has drier arms?

Ronnie easily. everyone can see that:

lmfao drier arms?  oh jesus

[Hulkster]

forgot the tris:

Ronnie's are striated. Dorian's are not.

check out the dryess of Ronnie's arm from the front too

[NarcissisticDeity]

forgot the tris:

Ronnie's are striated. Dorian's are not.

check out the dryess of Ronnie's arm from the front too

check out the film of water covering his tricep look at a bone dry tricep 

[Hulkster]

moving on to chest:

again, Ronnie easily

[Hulkster]

check out the film of water covering his tricep look at a bone dry tricep 

LOL its as smooth as a baby's ass!

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL its as smooth as a baby's ass!

man you're beyond my help , you have much to learn. 

[Hulkster]

time for the quads:

again, easy win for ronnie.

Dorian is not holding up well to 99 Ronnie's detail and dryness.

[Hulkster]

forgot to post this Ronnie 99 chest shot.

I know the dorian fans don't like to have their myth debunked, but Ronnie 99 was drier than Dorian.

just look at that grainyness and detail :

[Hulkster]

back time.

now, of course dorian has less water in the lower back than anyone.

but the upper back Ronnie can match.surpass him:

[Hulkster]

sorry yates fans, but more Ronnie dominating in the chest dryness department:

[Hulkster]

time for hams and glutes:

another easy win for Coleman:

[Hulkster]

might as well look at deltoid dryness while we are at it:

again,  easy win for ronnie in this area:


dorian's chest doesn't look bad in this shot, but its not up to Ronnie's level quite yet.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Lee Priest

HOW DO YOU FEEL DORIAN WOULD FAIR AGAINST RONNIE COLEMAN NOW?

I think Dorian at his best (1993) would easily beat Ronnie. Dorian might not be as symmetrical as Ronnie, but all over he was more complete and in better condition at his best.


more complete and in better condition . 

[Hulkster]

there you go sucky.

you wanted proof?

you got it.

[Hulkster]

and all ND can do is resort back to his quotes...

[NarcissisticDeity]

and all ND can do is resort back to his quotes...

From someone who was there lol from someone who competed with them both at their bests , now who should we believe? Hmmmmmmmmmm this is a hard one ..........Hulkster who claimed Dorian's conditioning was a myth in 1993 or Lee Priest who was actually there lol no contest.

[Hulkster]

From someone who was there lol from someone who competed with them both at their bests , now who should we believe? Hmmmmmmmmmm this is a hard one ..........Hulkster who claimed Dorian's conditioning was a myth in 1993 or Lee Priest who was actually there lol no contest.

oh its not a myth. dorian WAS greatly conditioned in 93.

But this was 1999 we are talking about. The sport progressed and Ronnie was dryer overall.

its all right there for the world to see.

If dorian was really drier than Ronnie why is it that I could post all that I just did>

answer: because Dorian was NOT as dry.

[NarcissisticDeity]

oh its not a myth. dorian WAS greatly conditioned in 93.

But this was 1999 we are talking about. The sport progressed and Ronnie was dryer overall.

its all right there for the world to see.

If dorian was really drier than Ronnie why is it that I could post all that I just did>

answer: because Dorian was NOT as dry.

lol

Dorian has the type of physique that looks much better and more powerfull in person than photos. I personally saw him onstage , and Yates if definitely light years ahead of the way he looks in photos.

 He's huge , absolutely HUGE ...he's ripped completely RIPPED. And while he's not in possession of the prettiest physique body by a long shot , he's equipped with all the bodyparts you need to win .

Combine this with the fact that he's 10 TIMES more impressive when you see him onstage at the Olympia than he is in pictures or on videos and you got yourself a winner.



Lee Priest

HOW DO YOU FEEL DORIAN WOULD FAIR AGAINST RONNIE COLEMAN NOW?

I think Dorian at his best (1993) would easily beat Ronnie. Dorian might not be as symmetrical as Ronnie, but all over he was more complete and in better condition at his best.


You make it so easy.