Author Topic: Who was better?  (Read 3149 times)

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Who was better?
« on: December 10, 2006, 03:16:49 AM »
Led Zeppelin
Rolling Stones
The Beatles

logical?

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2006, 03:22:03 AM »
Led Zep- imo.

I think my three favourite bands are Pink Floyd, Queen and Led Zep. I haven't heard much of the Stones, so I can't really comment though :-\

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2006, 03:23:20 AM »
Led Zeppelin
Rolling Stones
The Beatles

ALL OF THEM SUCKED
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

logical?

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2006, 03:24:27 AM »
ALL OF THEM SUCKED


not only in caps, but bold too. you must really feel strongly abuot this, so i assume you have a good argument to back it up.

please explain.

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2006, 03:26:27 AM »

not only in caps, but bold too. you must really feel strongly abuot this, so i assume you have a good argument to back it up.

please explain.
they were a bunch of pussy ass singers....i never liked gay ass bands like these..need i say more
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

logical?

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2006, 03:27:18 AM »
they were a bunch of pussy ass singers....i never liked gay ass bands like these..need i say more



Well, yes. Led Zep and the stones had one lead singer, so they couldn't be describe as a bunch of singers.

Further, they were hardly gay.

Please explain in further detail dude.

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2006, 03:31:12 AM »
they were a bunch of pussy ass singers....i never liked gay ass bands like these..need i say more

Sushant whats the matter?

Got bored bored of masturbating like a babboon over Amitabh Bachan? ::)

Birdman

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 732
  • Pump Til You Puke!
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2006, 03:31:19 AM »
Beatles

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2006, 03:34:33 AM »
Sushant whats the matter?

Got bored bored of masturbating like a babboon over Amitabh Bachan? ::)
looool
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

logical?

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2006, 03:35:02 AM »
what is 'loool' ?

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41320
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #10 on: December 10, 2006, 04:05:02 AM »
Zeplin
7

ManBearPig...

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12280
  • Professional Fighter
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #11 on: December 10, 2006, 06:32:47 AM »
if you guys know "the immigrant song"...the opening scream, that's what i sound like when i blow my load.
Deep Tissue Massage

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2006, 06:36:37 AM »
if you guys know "the immigrant song"...the opening scream, that's what i sound like when i blow my boyfriend

 :-\
Z

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2006, 06:40:46 AM »
Led Zeppelin ['69-75]
Rolling Stones ['68-72]
The Beatles ['65-70]
Bit of a trick question/poser. All three were seminal bands and great, GREAT, in their own rights. It comes down to personal taste. Love the Beatles, but I consider them a pop band, and my sensibilities are more rock oriented, so it would be a toss-up between the Zepp and Stones. I choose both.   

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2006, 06:52:47 AM »
Beatles.  They were a great pop band but some of the stuff they did later in thier career when they were all drugged up is incredible.
nasser=piece of shit

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #15 on: December 10, 2006, 06:56:36 AM »
actually beatles sucks. i cant think of a single song they made thay i want to listen to.
Z

Rome

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Pics or GTFO!
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #16 on: December 10, 2006, 07:01:50 AM »
Stones!They looked like hell but had some great songs

UK Gold

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Riding on the Getbig wind
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #17 on: December 10, 2006, 07:08:22 AM »
All form the UK :) [as well as the Sex Pistols, Iron Maiden and Black Sabbath. Nevermind, you yanks had the Eagles :-\]

Led Zep are untouchable. The best drummer, the best bassist / keyboardist, the best singer and of course the best guitarrist. They invented all the cliches we associate with rock music - the underage girls, the drink, the drugs, the obsecne ammounts of money etc etc. Oh, they also wrote the greatest rock songs ever written.

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #18 on: December 10, 2006, 07:12:29 AM »
what songs would that be?
Z

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #19 on: December 10, 2006, 07:19:58 AM »
All form the UK :) [as well as the Sex Pistols, Iron Maiden and Black Sabbath. Nevermind, you yanks had the Eagles :-\]

Led Zep are untouchable. The best drummer, the best bassist / keyboardist, the best singer and of course the best guitarrist. They invented all the cliches we associate with rock music - the underage girls, the drink, the drugs, the obsecne ammounts of money etc etc. Oh, they also wrote the greatest rock songs ever written.

u trying to say that Bonham, Page and Plant were paedos?

UK Gold

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Riding on the Getbig wind
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #20 on: December 10, 2006, 07:23:53 AM »
u trying to say that Bonham, Page and Plant were paedos?
Does sleeping with a 14 year old girl make you a peado? NO! Just damn lucky, lol. Read Hammer of the Gods or Stairway to Zeppelin for a good run down on their quest for hot young girls.
what songs would that be?
Kashmir, Since i've been loving you, Rock and Roll, When the Levee breaks, Bring it on home, Black dog etc etc.

msbarbelle

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 40
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #21 on: December 10, 2006, 07:27:13 AM »
Led Zeppelin
Rolling Stones
The Beatles


omg - led zeppelin hands down!
the beatles were history makers, yes, but not my kind of music.
the only people you see still going to stones concerts are fat, middle aged women who are trying desperately to look cool (on any level) while screaming for attention from their inattentive husbands.

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2006, 07:38:30 AM »
I thought you only listened to rap.

"if pac was still here now, he would never ride with ya.. na na na na na na"

when did i say i only listened to rap?


Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #23 on: December 10, 2006, 07:57:24 AM »
ALL OF THEM SUCKED
Fuck you Shusant.  THe Gobi 5 don't come into play.  I would say Beatles but Zepplin is a different genre so it's hard to say.
Squishy face retard

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Who was better?
« Reply #24 on: December 10, 2006, 08:54:49 AM »
it's all relative...they are all grat contributors to everyday culture...great musicians...great!