Well, it's hard to get complete information, or we'd certainly share it.
Then why make assumptions that you call facts with incomplete information?
That's irresponsible.
Newsweek telling us something worded like "the top Pentagon brass received warnings not to fly the next morning", then NO MEDIA OUTLET touching the story after that. And the pentagon denying it. And Newsweek tight lipped on it.
You did it again. "All" the top brass vs a "group" of top brass is 2 very differnt things that lead the reader to 2 different conclusions.
For you to be this irresponsbile is criminal and takes away your credibility.
that's why people give you so much shit about your "facts"
Condi admitted that Air Force One received coded threats from an inside mole that day, on Meet the Press. The next day, Ari Fleischer saying he knows nothing about it, then refusing to address it again.
Based on your past track record, i don't completely believe you. Condi may have said: "Air Force One received
suspected or possible coded threats" which changes the meaning of her statement dramatically concerning the issue.
that's why i try and usually ask you to give me a link. Hopefully not some gay ass music laced amature final cut pro movie. hopefully you can just post the actual straight forward video of it. Kind of like that reporter at the pentagon. pretty straight forward.
But no, you usually don;t becuase you are getting all the info from tainted sources. (9/11 CT sites)
Things like that cast monster doubt on the credibility of the very admin we're supposed to believe? No way.
And, the fact they didn't let the investigation be independent. that they gave it 13 mil (after putting $60M on bush's inauguration lol). the fact they ordered the scope be limited oNLy to al-Q... any evidence pointing elsewhere was not to come into play. WTF is that? lol...
All of which DOES NOT points to:
- The pentagon was hit by a missile
- The WTC's were brought down by bombs
- Flight 93 was brought shot down by a US fighter jet or was another missile, not a plane to begin with
- WTC was acontrolled demolitioin
But instead point to cover upi of incompetence. Becuase America wants to why the billions we spend on security failed that day.