Author Topic: Tito???  (Read 2481 times)

SinCitysmallGUY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4317
  • FIST-ta-CUFF Radio
Tito???
« on: December 30, 2006, 11:42:18 PM »
If anyone hears anything about his foot i would like to know????? did he really break that shit or what... i wanna hear if tito thought the fight was stopped premature... in my opinion it was stopped way premature but i hope this sets up the Tito Rampage fight.......

americanbulldog

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2681
Re: Tito???
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2006, 12:55:05 AM »
Hats off to Chuck.  He didn't grab the fence, he didn't poke the eye.  I will no longer call him Chack. 

DNewbie

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 174
  • Getbig!
Re: Tito???
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2006, 06:31:49 AM »
If anyone hears anything about his foot i would like to know????? did he really break that shit or what... i wanna hear if tito thought the fight was stopped premature... in my opinion it was stopped way premature but i hope this sets up the Tito Rampage fight.......

Hell no was it stopped early. How many shots do you want a guy to take? The ref can't let a guy lay there in the fetal position and take shots to the head for very long. Doesn't matter, it would have been over anyways.

Logan32

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 192
  • Getbig!
Re: Tito???
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2006, 09:16:31 AM »
If anyone hears anything about his foot i would like to know????? did he really break that shit or what... i wanna hear if tito thought the fight was stopped premature... in my opinion it was stopped way premature but i hope this sets up the Tito Rampage fight.......

Well Tito talks alot of smack all the time so I would not be surprised if he does say it. I have to give him props though for the way he handled his loss last night showed a much humbler Tito. How long that lasts is anyones guess though. As far as Rampage goes I think they both said they would not fight each other. Will be interesting to see the Chuck vs Rampage rematch.... Now that is definitely a fight that can go either way

IronGame

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 311
  • Getbig!
Re: Tito???
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2006, 03:37:42 PM »
Tito took quite a bit of damage.  It was a good stoppage
white belt for life

Capt._America

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 264
  • Would rather be feared than respected
Re: Tito???
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2007, 05:05:56 AM »
So getting punched in the forearms is alot of damage, damn i need to start watching something new then, actually starting to believe UFC is becoming WWE to a certain extent, whomever Dana wants to win, wins, Gsp beats Matt by kicking him in the balls 4 or 5 times, nothing called, that is okay, Chuck is a joke, hope Rampage kicks his ass, but if Chuck hits him 5 or 6 times in the arms, fight will be over

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Tito???
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2007, 09:25:47 AM »
if Chuck is laying punches down on a fighter repeatedly then the referee HAS to stop the fight. He has scary power and could really damage someone if he was left to it by the referee, it was a good call. Tito still has his health, he can be thankful for that
Scouser on Tour

Your MAAAAaaaa

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1402
  • GETBIGS MINISTER OF SEXUAL HEALTH
Re: Tito???
« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2007, 10:12:50 AM »
Tito showed us what a great battler he was I thought he was done for in round ! but he has heart and desire and that has to be admired.


Chuck is awesome and I hope he and Rampage get it on soon!


ta ta
Pm me for STI advice @ NO COST

IronGame

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 311
  • Getbig!
Re: Tito???
« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2007, 12:27:22 PM »
I didn't notice Tito (then or since) arguing about the stoppage.  He was still dazed from the pounding he took earlier. This ain't boxing, and those 4oz gloves are like hammers. Good call by the ref.
white belt for life

20inch calves

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4740
Re: Tito???
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2007, 02:34:22 PM »
it def. wasn't called to early. tito did great for making it past the first round when he got in trouble. all in all i thought it was a great fight.
irongearco.com

dootle

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 106
Re: Tito???
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2007, 03:35:06 PM »
absotively a good stoppage..John allowed him time to recover in the first,and tito proved he deserved it by getting up and continuing to fight(even attack),but he had enough and john knew it..tito wasn't going to tap under any circumstance,he is a true fighter..

RancherRanger

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 633
  • Getbig!
Re: Tito???
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2007, 04:50:31 AM »
Tito played right into Chuck's game.  He got a good shot in and decided to trade with Chuck, not a good decision!

SinCitysmallGUY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4317
  • FIST-ta-CUFF Radio
Re: Tito???
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2007, 09:33:23 AM »
Okay i dont know about the fight being stopped to early... here's my thing i didnt see very many of those punches land to Tito's face or head... it was blocked yeah Tito was rocked in the 1st and maybe it was a good idea to stop the fight for his health... But who fucking fights for thier healt.... Tito was humble in defeat. which i was suprised by.. But I am still a little pissed about the stoppage... Also the stoppage in the Andre Arloswski fight. Fuck a good stoppage is when Tito beat Ken's ass and Ken wasnt defending. Tito had his arms up blocking and wasnt unconcious. Chuck is the champ but im getting bored with him being champ...

jarhead

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 697
  • First name Mister. Last name "T".
Re: Tito???
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2007, 11:18:54 AM »
Good stoppage by the ref.

Tito may have been getting hit in the arms but there was no way he was going to be able to get back up and counter.  It was just a matter of time.  Chuck would have stayed on him.

I like Chuck as champion.  He is professional.

JustaFan

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Re: Tito???
« Reply #14 on: January 02, 2007, 11:49:10 AM »
Quote
Good stoppage by the ref.

Tito may have been getting hit in the arms but there was no way he was going to be able to get back up and counter.  It was just a matter of time.  Chuck would have stayed on him.

I like Chuck as champion.  He is professional. 

I agree, it was only a matter of seconds before he connected with shots to the head. 
I think Dana wanted Tito to win to set up a big rubber match between them.  I was cheering for Tito,  but you have to give Chuck his props.  He hasnt lost in a while.

americanbulldog

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2681
Re: Tito???
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2007, 11:59:04 AM »
So getting punched in the forearms is alot of damage, damn i need to start watching something new then, actually starting to believe UFC is becoming WWE to a certain extent, whomever Dana wants to win, wins, Gsp beats Matt by kicking him in the balls 4 or 5 times, nothing called, that is okay, Chuck is a joke, hope Rampage kicks his ass, but if Chuck hits him 5 or 6 times in the arms, fight will be over

Tito didn't spin back to center, use his guard or upkick in defense.  You can't lay there and accept bombs and not get a ref stoppage. 

20inch calves

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4740
Re: Tito???
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2007, 05:52:54 PM »
i actually like chuck now. i didn't but i do now. i think he's a very entertaining fighter. i am glad tito did not win because we would have never heard the end of it.
irongearco.com