I'm just learning about the theories, I am certianly not qualified to make any assessment, good or bad. I just wanted to know why this theory hasn't been quickly disproved.
if TA came on the board tomrorow and said the sky was green, someone would post a pic of a blue sky followed by UV information proving him wrong. If he came out and said he planned to bench 1200 by 2008, he would quickly disproven by others using records, tendon strength models, and empirical records of the progress of others and the plateaus as one nears limits.
But he's been talking about this theory for months now - his only example being a very ripped himself - and no one among this great group of obviously motivated people has been able to prove him wrong.
Me just curious, that's all

A bunch of reasons:
1 He could be completely full of shit about what he ate
2 He could be on any number of fat burning supplements/drugs
3 The "principles" .......if he did actually use them, are nothing new. Calories in/Calories out is older than me.
4 I'm not impressed with the results no matter what he actually did, he looked emaciated.