Author Topic: Are these models toooo skinny? (Read 6450 times)

Deedee · « **on:** January 10, 2007, 06:45:00 AM »

Here's a few pics from the '07 Spring Chanel collection. Are these legs too skinny? Love the clothes, but frick and frack, I find these thighs a little too thin. Doesn't look good...

Does it?

Deedee · « **Reply #1 on:** January 10, 2007, 06:46:04 AM »

Oh yeah... love this outfit!!!

Cap · « **Reply #2 on:** January 10, 2007, 07:41:12 AM »

Someone get these women a meatball sub. Way too thin.

Faust · « **Reply #3 on:** January 10, 2007, 09:15:21 AM »

Yes, WAY too skinny.
I love curves on a woman. I'd rather have a few pounds overweight than underweight.

The BEAST · « **Reply #4 on:** January 10, 2007, 09:41:04 AM »

Yikes....I guess I rarely see runway models...at least the V-Secret models have some meat on their bones. This look scares me, I don't think it is at all attractive. Their calves are as big as their thigh and it isn't because they have big calves.

Cap · « **Reply #5 on:** January 10, 2007, 09:46:34 AM »

Quote from: The BEAST on January 10, 2007, 09:41:04 AM

Yikes....I guess I rarely see runway models...at least the V-Secret models have some meat on their bones. This look scares me, I don't think it is at all attractive. Their calves are as big as their thigh and it isn't because they have big calves.

Women think this looks good but it looks gross. I don't like bigger women but I like some meat on the bones so I know that hugging the girl won't cause me to crack her ribs.

ToxicAvenger · « **Reply #6 on:** January 10, 2007, 09:47:05 AM »

yes skinny...

they prolly have bone against bone skinny sex....ewww...

Deedee · « **Reply #7 on:** January 10, 2007, 10:28:21 AM »

Yes, I would prescribe a couple of meatball subs and few side orders of fries too. The second one is a little better than the first... I can't even imagine the first one squatting a broomstick.

Here's naked Kate. She looks okay, but just very different from women you see in the gym, and I'm not talking about bodybuilders necessarily, just the average woman who works out... or well, who even plays tennis or something. $:-\$ They have no calves, really skinny shoulders.

Cap · « **Reply #8 on:** January 10, 2007, 11:01:08 AM »

Quote from: Deedee on January 10, 2007, 10:28:21 AM

Yes, I would prescribe a couple of meatball subs and few side orders of fries too. The second one is a little better than the first... I can't even imagine the first one squatting a broomstick.

Here's naked Kate. She looks okay, but just very different from women you see in the gym, and I'm not talking about bodybuilders necessarily, just the average woman who works out... or well, who even plays tennis or something. $:-\$ They have no calves, really skinny shoulders.

They seriously need to stop hiring models like this and it will change. Not to sound like a total meathead but why would any guy want to date a woman who seems to have the body of a ten year old boy/girl. No curves, no chest, no butt is kind of gross IMO. I know all women are different in those departments but simply having none is just plain bad.

bling thing · « **Reply #9 on:** January 10, 2007, 12:26:48 PM »

I agree, no muscle.

But Kate's okay, she's a great lady (yeah, I've met her too... a few times. She's real and so very funny. Perhaps they're born skinny, it's a different body type?

bling thing · « **Reply #10 on:** January 10, 2007, 12:29:46 PM »

ps: I worked as a model (fitting) in NY. I'm 5'6", medium perfect build.
The funny thing is that the clothes fit me but look & sell better on a tall skinny drink of water. honest.

x

pps: Karl Lagerfeld ROCKS (met him too... I bought the most amazing red velvet dress at his sample sale, his salesroom was one floor up from ours on 7th avenue. He was lovely. I still have the dress and it still fits me.

But I'm sorry, it would look (drape?) better on someone like Kate.

Earl1972 · « **Reply #11 on:** January 10, 2007, 12:50:56 PM »

bling thing · « **Reply #12 on:** January 10, 2007, 12:59:00 PM »

bulletin boarding is a sport?

look, sorry, but models are skinny. the clothes work better on the runway on them. normal women with tits and asses can still wear the fashions, after the show. Perhaps they even look better on real women.

but they sell better when tall skinny models wear them for show first. I agree that the first anorexic one has no thighs, but she doesn't have to throw out her jeans when they get worn out between her thighs, does she?

You don't have to think or worry about having sex with her, I doubt she has time to get out of bed and drink a glass of water, so you won't be going there anyways, will you? They do have lovely faces though, no?

michael arvilla · « **Reply #13 on:** January 10, 2007, 01:08:27 PM »

no

bling thing · « **Reply #14 on:** January 10, 2007, 01:12:28 PM »

Quote from: michael arvilla on January 10, 2007, 01:08:27 PM

no

ok, I agree, i prefer a bit of muscle too, but skinny models are tall skinny models and the clothes look best on them on the runway.

What you gonna do, put them out of a job? what else can they do? they can't exactly work at anything else for a living, they might fall over and break something.