Oreilly: AntiWar people have always been "Intellectually and morally bankrupt"

[240 is Back]

his talking points tonight were hilarious.

"The same people who hate the war, also hate reagan and love castro".

no shit, this was seriously the headline.  I wish I could get a screenshot.  incredible. 

[240 is Back]

jane fonda wanted to talk about the war.  Oreilly's man grilled her continually on her views on viewnam from 33 years ago.

um, look, 3 years ago, bill oreilly was having phone sex with an employee of his.  That doesn't make him any less credible today when talking about family values, does it?

[240 is Back]

"ONLY 150,000 dead, accoring to UN estimates." 

ONLY.

LMAO... i see this show as comedy now.  He has this hot ass brunette michelle malkin on to bash the democrats for 5 minutes.  Then they give this inbred looking blonde lady a 3-part question and then interrupt her when she's answering.  As she bumbles through it, the hot brunette and OReilly talk to one another about the blonde retard's inability to answer questions.

[240 is Back]

Oreilly couldn't argue with Sean Penn's point about pre-emptive attack on a soverign nation who hasn't done anything wrong..

So he made fun of his hair.

[OzmO]

Oreilly couldn't argue with Sean Penn's point about pre-emptive attack on a soverign nation who hasn't done anything wrong..

So he made fun of his hair.

classic deflection technique..............a ttack the hair!

[240 is Back]

A reader asked him why he no longer bashes the far right, instead focusing on the far left.

he said when the far right does something wrong, HE'LL TELL US ABOUT IT.

[BRUCE]

A reader asked him why he no longer bashes the far right, instead focusing on the far left.

he said when the far right does something wrong, HE'LL TELL US ABOUT IT.

Haha, and that's the memo.  But seriously, I wouldn't watch this guy if I didn't agree with the general thrust of his arguments.  That being said, I'm not a huge fan anyway - I like my conservatives more moderate.

[240 is Back]

Haha, and that's the memo.  But seriously, I wouldn't watch this guy if I didn't agree with the general thrust of his arguments.  That being said, I'm not a huge fan anyway - I like my conservatives more moderate.

I watched him every night for years, because while he was to the right, he did use to show both sides.

Last year, he made a big deal about his new mission, to "even the media playing field".  He then lost any semblance of fair and balanced.  He openly admits when his listeners need to hear something about the right, he'll tell them.  But the show is his way of evening what he considers media inequality.

He is no longer a journalist at this point - he is a white house mouthpiece.

And that is fine.  but when people come on here and say he is fair, they are completely ignorant.  I can't stand the guy anymore, I listen to him tell his viewers how anyone who questions Bush's judgment also "hates reagan and loves castro"... I mean seriously, he's a little "off". 

[24KT]

I watched him every night for years, because while he was to the right, he did use to show both sides.

Last year, he made a big deal about his new mission, to "even the media playing field".  He then lost any semblance of fair and balanced.  He openly admits when his listeners need to hear something about the right, he'll tell them.  But the show is his way of evening what he considers media inequality.

He is no longer a journalist at this point - he is a white house mouthpiece.

And that is fine.  but when people come on here and say he is fair, they are completely ignorant.  I can't stand the guy anymore, I listen to him tell his viewers how anyone who questions Bush's judgment also "hates reagan and loves castro"... I mean seriously, he's a little "off". 

Now picture about 30 million mindless minions like him, preaching to a dazed, shocked and confused 270 million, trying to bring them on board to dominate 6 billion.

Welcome to the world's nightmare!

[mightymouse72]

his talking points tonight were hilarious.

"The same people who hate the war, also hate reagan and love castro".

no shit, this was seriously the headline.  I wish I could get a screenshot.  incredible. 

he was referring to the far left nuts.  and that was not the headline. 
no where in his talking points did i hear him attack sean penn's hair.  although who would blame him.
his 150,000 dead comment was a more accurate number than surandon's 650,000 dead. 

hanoi jane should be grilled about veitnam.  she should not even be alive in this country.  when she's a part of your organization, you better rethink your views.


i am not defending oreilly.  just get your facts straight. 

all the far left media out there and you completely bash the one channel that leans right. 
god you're a sheep.

[240 is Back]

he was referring to the far left nuts.  and that was not the headline. 
no where in his talking points did i hear him attack sean penn's hair.  although who would blame him.
his 150,000 dead comment was a more accurate number than surandon's 650,000 dead. 

He made fun of Penn's hair in the section after the Talking points, at the end of malkin's piece.  Hence, I explained the piece with malkin after talking points.  I thought that was obvious.

i am not defending oreilly.  just get your facts straight. 

Do you believe that eevryone who is anti-war also "hates reagan and loves castro"?

[OzmO]

For the record..........I love Reagan, and I'm very anti Iraq war! 

P.S.  Castro is evil, neo-cons blow donkeys, and extreme-libs need to stop whinning like little bitches over stupid shit

[mightymouse72]

Oreilly couldn't argue with Sean Penn's point about pre-emptive attack on a soverign nation who hasn't done anything wrong..

So he made fun of his hair.

i think he did make his arguement when he stated how the US and Britain had the legal authority to remove Saddam after he broke the first resolution.

He made fun of Penn's hair in the section after the Talking points, at the end of malkin's piece.  Hence, I explained the piece with malkin after talking points.  I thought that was obvious.

no, it wasn't obvious.

Do you believe that eevryone who is anti-war also "hates reagan and loves castro"?

everyone who is anti-war?  No.

those pyscho's at the protest???  probably most

[OzmO]

i think he did make his arguement when he stated how the US and Britain had the legal authority to remove Saddam after he broke the first resolution.

There is such a thing as legal authority to invade a soveriegn country and cuase the death of 150,000+ iraqis to remove 1 man from power?  Was it the UN's legal authority?  Oh wait did they back the invasion?

That's insanely stupid.

[mightymouse72]

That's insanely stupid.

yes, it is

[Mr. Intenseone]

his talking points tonight were hilarious.

"The same people who hate the war, also hate reagan and love castro".

no shit, this was seriously the headline.  I wish I could get a screenshot.  incredible. 

Doesn't seem like he's too far off.....just read some of the post on this board!

[Hugo Chavez]

Doesn't seem like he's too far off.....just read some of the post on this board!

[OzmO]

Doesn't seem like he's too far off.....just read some of the post on this board!

Actually he's very far off becuase he's taking extremes and applying them to the bulk of people who are against this wasteful blunder called Iraq.  It's a basic spin technique supporters of both parties use to attack each other with. 

[Mr. Intenseone]

Actually he's very far off becuase he's taking extremes and applying them to the bulk of people who are against this wasteful blunder called Iraq.  It's a basic spin technique supporters of both parties use to attack each other with. 

Maybe so.......but he pretty much Liberalism in prospective!

[OzmO]

Maybe so.......but he pretty much Liberalism in prospective!

i'm not sure what you meant there....

[tu_holmes]

Doesn't seem like he's too far off.....just read some of the post on this board!

Oh come on... I loved Reagan and I hate Castro... let's be honest here for a minute.

The Republican party has been hijacked... period.

It is not the party of Goldwater and Goldwater would hate to see the Republican party turned into this fiasco.

Republicans used to be about smaller government... that provided tax cuts.

Republicans used to be about keep your religion to yourself... now they're about showing you that Christianity is the only way.

The FAR right wing neo-cons have hijacked the Republican party plain and simple.

I used to consider myself a Republican, but how can I do so now?

As far as the Dems are concerned... quit bitching and do something. I'm tired of everyone fucking whining.

[240 is Back]

Oh come on... I loved Reagan and I hate Castro... let's be honest here for a minute.
The Republican party has been hijacked... period.
It is not the party of Goldwater and Goldwater would hate to see the Republican party turned into this fiasco.
Republicans used to be about smaller government... that provided tax cuts.
Republicans used to be about keep your religion to yourself... now they're about showing you that Christianity is the only way.
The FAR right wing neo-cons have hijacked the Republican party plain and simple.
I used to consider myself a Republican, but how can I do so now?
As far as the Dems are concerned... quit bitching and do something. I'm tired of everyone fucking whining.

You're correct.  I was a lifelong hardcore republican til 2006.  Now I consider myself a moderate republican, waiting for the party to return.

In 5 years, people will look back at this neoconservative time period as disgusting.  I've seen some getbiggers here change positions, from complete Bush supporters, to just "waiting for him to leave office" in the last year on this forum.  It's sad. 

[mightymouse72]

The Republican party has been hijacked... period.

and the dems have always been the same straight-laced party??  come on

[240 is Back]

and the dems have always been the same straight-laced party??  come on

you're not answering the question about the horrible, dangerous direction the (some of) repub party has taken.

instead, you want to do a history lesson on the dems?  is that the best you can do?

"Hey officer, I know you think I killed those two guys, but some guy named Stalin once killed 70 million people, so really, what's the big fking deal here?"

[tu_holmes]

and the dems have always been the same straight-laced party??  come on

I didn't say that... but I certainly would say that the Dems are doing what they are as a response to the Hijacking of the Republican party...


Like I said... I used to consider myself a REAL Republican... what the hell do I have now? I was told my opinion is shit if I don't go along with the plan.

What choice do I have? Be a Libertarian... which is pretty much what the Republican party used to be.

Remember when conservative meant small government, defense, tax cuts, and keep our noses out of other peoples lives?

You don't? That's because it's been almost 15 years since they were like that.

You think I'm some Democratic uber-liberal? I remember when the Republican party didn't give a shit what you did on your own time... now they want to put their noses right into your business with wiretappings and illegal searches.

How can you possibly defend the Republican party right now...

I'm not saying the Dems are any better really, but since they haven't been in power in such a long time, they haven't had the opportunity to do some things maybe... But absolute power corrupts absolutely... and the Republicans have had absolute power for far too long.

All I know, is that what Bush and his cronies have done is nothing compared to a BJ in the oval office.

Hate if you wanna... and next time, respond to the point...