« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)  (Read 10786 times)

Buttsuck

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2189
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #25 on: January 30, 2007, 09:18:49 AM »
Quote from: BayGBM on January 30, 2007, 09:08:29 AM
He placed 4th in the Junior USA in 2001 and was the heavyweight and overall winner in the Texas State Championships in 2005
His only decent placing. The rest are 16 which is why i coined the phrase Jay "16th place" Moore.
Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #26 on: January 30, 2007, 09:21:30 AM »
Quote from: Buttsuck on January 30, 2007, 09:18:49 AM
His only decent placing. The rest are 16 which is why i coined the phrase Jay "16th place" Moore.

Ouch!  :'(
Logged

Dingleberry

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2408
  • My nuts, your chin, any questions?
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #27 on: January 30, 2007, 09:25:33 AM »
Nothing pretty about branch but he's built like a brick shithouse. Very powerful looking physique, reminds me of Mentzer. If I was to be that big, I’d want to look just like that. A Texas beast.
Logged
tiny-tit bounty hunter

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #28 on: January 30, 2007, 12:23:50 PM »
Quote from: Dingleberry on January 30, 2007, 09:25:33 AM
Nothing pretty about branch but he's built like a brick shithouse. Very powerful looking physique, reminds me of Mentzer. If I was to be that big, I’d want to look just like that. A Texas beast.

So you want to look like a shithouse? ;)
Logged

Dingleberry

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2408
  • My nuts, your chin, any questions?
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #29 on: January 30, 2007, 12:39:13 PM »
Quote from: donrhummy on January 30, 2007, 12:23:50 PM
So you want to look like a shithouse? ;)

A brick one, yes.  ;D
Logged
tiny-tit bounty hunter

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #30 on: January 30, 2007, 12:49:18 PM »
Quote from: Dingleberry on January 30, 2007, 09:25:33 AM
Nothing pretty about branch but he's built like a brick shithouse. Very powerful looking physique, reminds me of Mentzer. If I was to be that big, I’d want to look just like that. A Texas beast.
hahahaha, "beast", the guy is 5'6".
Logged

Croatch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
  • Man up, train natural.
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #31 on: January 30, 2007, 12:53:17 PM »
Quote
hahahaha, "beast", the guy is 5'6".
I'm 5' 7 1/2", I'm a fucking giant!!
Logged
N

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #32 on: January 30, 2007, 12:55:03 PM »
Quote from: Croatch on January 30, 2007, 12:53:17 PM
I'm 5' 7 1/2", I'm a fucking giant!!

I'm 5'7 and 7/12's so I'm taller than you are, haha.
Logged
nasser=piece of shit

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #33 on: January 30, 2007, 12:55:45 PM »
Jay more has/had syntholed delts.
Logged

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #34 on: January 30, 2007, 12:57:39 PM »
Quote from: davidpaul on January 30, 2007, 12:55:45 PM
Jay more has/had syntholed delts.
nah i think it's just his 14 inch arms that make his normal sized shoulders look huge.
Logged

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #35 on: January 30, 2007, 01:03:01 PM »
Quote from: The Squadfather on January 30, 2007, 12:57:39 PM
nah i think it's just his 14 inch arms that make his normal sized shoulders look huge.

he seriously has, look out for pics of him doing a side chest, his rear delts stick out at a very funny angle, like nasser at his worst, i mean his pecs aresmaller than his delts in that pic in this thread.
Logged

DOGGCRAPP

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 464
  • Getbig!
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #36 on: January 30, 2007, 01:13:31 PM »
All the guys on this thread, do all your training partners look like carbon copies of your physique?

(theres a little word called genetics and there really isnt much you can do about it--blame mom and pop)

If Jim Carrey trained with Jay Cutler, ate like Jay Cutler, and did everything Jay Cutler does for the next 2 years, do you think he is going to look even remotely close to looking like Jay Cutler?
Logged

Big N

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5564
  • Veteran Fella
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #37 on: January 30, 2007, 01:16:52 PM »
Quote from: DOGGCRAPP on January 30, 2007, 01:13:31 PM
All the guys on this thread, do all your training partners look like carbon copies of your physique?

(theres a little word called genetics and there really isnt much you can do about it--blame mom and pop)

If Jim Carrey trained with Jay Cutler, ate like Jay Cutler, and did everything Jay Cutler does for the next 2 years, do you think he is going to look even remotely close to looking like Jay Cutler?


I got a curious question for ya, are you the founder of DOGGCRAPP bro?
Logged
#

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #38 on: January 30, 2007, 01:17:03 PM »
Quote from: DOGGCRAPP on January 30, 2007, 01:13:31 PM
All the guys on this thread, do all your training partners look like carbon copies of your physique?

(theres a little word called genetics and there really isnt much you can do about it--blame mom and pop)

If Jim Carrey trained with Jay Cutler, ate like Jay Cutler, and did everything Jay Cutler does for the next 2 years, do you think he is going to look even remotely close to looking like Jay Cutler?

If he was using the same drugs he sure would.   He would be about the same size.
Logged

DOGGCRAPP

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 464
  • Getbig!
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #39 on: January 30, 2007, 01:17:58 PM »
Quote from: The True Adonis on January 30, 2007, 01:17:03 PM
If he was using the same drugs he sure would.   He would be about the same size.

you are kidding correct?
Logged

20inch calves

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4616
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #40 on: January 30, 2007, 01:48:37 PM »
Quote from: DOGGCRAPP on January 30, 2007, 01:17:58 PM
you are kidding correct?

i doubt he is kidding. he really is that dumb
Logged
irongearco.com

UK Gold

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Riding on the Getbig wind
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #41 on: January 30, 2007, 01:56:42 PM »
Quote from: DOGGCRAPP on January 30, 2007, 01:13:31 PM
All the guys on this thread, do all your training partners look like carbon copies of your physique?

(theres a little word called genetics and there really isnt much you can do about it--blame mom and pop)

If Jim Carrey trained with Jay Cutler, ate like Jay Cutler, and did everything Jay Cutler does for the next 2 years, do you think he is going to look even remotely close to looking like Jay Cutler?
Maybe Jim Carey's response to the gear would be BETTER than Jays and he would be twenty pounds heavier.

NEVER underestimate the power of steroids - i'm saying that as a juicer, so don't give me no genetics bullshit 'doggcrapp' ::)
Logged

Adam Empire

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2370
  • Gobias Industries
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #42 on: January 30, 2007, 02:11:03 PM »
Quote from: columbusdude82 on January 30, 2007, 09:04:58 AM
Branch was 23 in 99? I just looked it up on musclememory... dude was born in 1975! He's 31/32 now... Impressive in a way, but also he looks damn old for his age..

Oh my...  I thought he was at least 36 to 38.  By the time he is 40 his face will look terrible.  (and who knows what shape his head will be)
Logged
Motherboy (the band).

phyxsius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6264
  • Mini Getbigger
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #43 on: January 30, 2007, 02:15:59 PM »
Both are ugly..

Branch has better drugs and shorter lifespan
Logged
I am a mini beast

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #44 on: January 30, 2007, 02:17:31 PM »
Quote from: UK Gold on January 30, 2007, 01:56:42 PM
Maybe Jim Carey's response to the gear would be BETTER than Jays and he would be twenty pounds heavier.

NEVER underestimate the power of steroids - i'm saying that as a juicer, so don't give me no genetics bullshit 'doggcrapp' ::)

Very true.

Logged

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #45 on: January 30, 2007, 03:06:27 PM »
Jay doesn't even look the same......

Logged

ButtonMan

  • Guest
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #46 on: January 31, 2007, 07:14:41 AM »
Quote from: Buttsuck on January 30, 2007, 08:44:23 AM
Hahaha i had a whole Jay Moore collection which unfortunantly i deleted but was filled with goodies.

Too bad ..  that was a classic collection  ;D
Logged

Buttsuck

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2189
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #47 on: January 31, 2007, 09:44:20 AM »
Quote from: ButtonMan on January 31, 2007, 07:14:41 AM
Too bad ..  that was a classic collection  ;D
indeed it wat lol
Logged

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #48 on: January 31, 2007, 10:32:00 AM »



looks like jay ran out of esiclene for this right side.

guy was never close to branch. 
Logged
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

goat

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 104
  • Getbig!
Re: Jay Moore (vs. Branch)
« Reply #49 on: January 31, 2007, 11:29:26 AM »
Quote from: donrhummy on January 30, 2007, 08:57:10 AM
Please, you're making something out of nothing. Jay NEVER had the same development/potential as Branch.

Here's Branch at age 23 in 1999:



[I agree, I used to train at Metroflex back in 1997 and 1998 and have seen them train together a few times and even then Branch was way more advanced than Jay.]
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »