« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison  (Read 1924 times)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« on: February 03, 2007, 05:31:08 PM »
Thanks to "Pain" from musclemecca.com. Both guys look grainy. Gunter pic is from 2003 BFTO.
Logged

figgs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3925
  • from realization to infinity
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2007, 05:39:43 PM »
Awesome comparison. Gaspari is getting dwarfed! Yet he he's still goddamn impressive.
Logged
~

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2007, 05:41:02 PM »
gunter is obviously natty while gaspari is juiced to the max
Logged
A

Knives

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 833
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2007, 05:42:10 PM »
can you get better quality pics?
Logged

swilkins1984

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2007, 05:45:45 PM »
i didn't know Gunter ever got so dry. Wow :o
Logged

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2007, 05:51:17 PM »
Quote from: Knives on February 03, 2007, 05:42:10 PM
can you get better quality pics?

I just found the pic. I didn't make the comparison. Just open the pic to 100% to see the image better.
Logged

healthiswealth

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Getbig!
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2007, 06:08:02 PM »
man, some of you people are fucking stupid. even Vince Goodrum would look grainy in a pixelated b/w picture. Its the same dilemma facing that yates vs. coleman thread, where the majority of yates pics are black and white pixelated shots.

Gunter matching Gaspari's conditioning? come on... ::)
Logged

getfast81

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 959
  • Borat is for the weak................
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2007, 07:17:14 PM »
When I first saw this thread headline I thought it would be a stupid comparison but that is an awesome pic.  That shot of Gaspari is one of the freakiest shots ever (outside of Dennis James gym shots).
Logged
Truly STOP WHINING

SwingGuru

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 73
  • Getbig!
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2007, 10:15:32 PM »
But the real comparison is when they stand next to each other.  Gaspari could hide behind Gunter and you wouldn't even know he is there he is so small and pitiful.  No wonder so many midgets take to weightlifting.
Logged

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #9 on: February 03, 2007, 10:19:29 PM »
Gunter is barbarically raping gaspari in that comparison. 
Logged

Sjipes

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Gunter vs. Gaspari Comparison
« Reply #10 on: February 03, 2007, 10:20:12 PM »
Quote from: healthiswealth on February 03, 2007, 06:08:02 PM
man, some of you people are fucking stupid. even Vince Goodrum would look grainy in a pixelated b/w picture. Its the same dilemma facing that yates vs. coleman thread, where the majority of yates pics are black and white pixelated shots.

Gunter matching Gaspari's conditioning? come on... ::)

actually i think we can safely say this one is a winning comparison, ive seen the unaltered picture and was trying to find it[impossible when you have like 1000 pics on pen drive, probably named ''untitled'' ::), gunter is perhaps a little less dry but vascularity is amazing! his veins are clearly more visible, but whethers that down to who's shitting impression is the most intense is debatable
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »