« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)  (Read 3918 times)

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« on: February 07, 2007, 12:29:13 AM »
awesome comparison
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

Tombo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4725
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2007, 12:45:09 AM »
A 'STFU' vs a 'GTFO'


a thrilling question, one you couldn't guess!
Logged

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2007, 12:45:19 AM »
Great legs on Wheeler. For a big man, Nasser had an awesome ab/thigh.
Logged

rccs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3085
  • Alma Matter!
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2007, 02:08:03 AM »
Quote from: the shadow on February 07, 2007, 12:29:13 AM
awesome comparison
Nasser is destroying Flex!
Logged
S

GroinkTropin

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3138
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2007, 02:21:58 AM »
Nasser destroyed him from the front, but his lack of back detail cost him everything. With a back like ronnies, he would have won 5 sandows.
Logged

Petrucci

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1969
  • Team Kratos!!!
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2007, 02:42:21 AM »
Nasser is owning Flex in that photo...and like someone already wrote, Nasser had a incredible midsection, unusual for a guy of his size.
 Even without a superb back, i think he should have got at least one sandow, giving the fact he dominated so many competitors from the front and side
Logged
!

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30287
  • Mentzer is Alive
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2007, 06:51:15 AM »
Nasser should have easily won the 1997 Arnold Classic.

I remember after the show Nasser said flex had a neck like a boy (classic)
Logged

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2007, 07:22:11 PM »
1997 Arnold Classic.
Logged

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2007, 07:23:56 PM »
 :o
Logged

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2007, 07:33:12 PM »
Quote from: LoveTheSport on February 07, 2007, 07:23:56 PM
:o

Damn, Flex just looks like a cartoon character in this shot.
Logged

jonsande

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 234
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2007, 07:45:48 PM »
His back blows Nasser's out of the water.  No comparison.
Logged

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2007, 07:46:08 PM »
Post the  98 AC pictures, Flex was much better :o
Logged

MRMD2003

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 299
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2007, 08:43:29 PM »
DA SHIT IS CHESS NOT CHECKERS !!!
Logged

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2007, 08:48:59 PM »


End of discussion
Logged

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #14 on: February 07, 2007, 08:57:19 PM »
Nasser is bigger for sure

But Flex annhilates him in every other department, he's on another level.

Difference between a Viper and a Ferrari
Logged

dogbowl

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Team anyone except heath
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2007, 12:56:02 AM »
Quote from: ribonucleic on February 07, 2007, 08:48:59 PM


End of discussion

Flex wins that pose, Nasser wins all the others
Logged

Petrucci

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1969
  • Team Kratos!!!
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2007, 02:48:43 AM »
Quote from: dogbowl on February 08, 2007, 12:56:02 AM
Flex wins that pose, Nasser wins all the others

thats what im seeying...Nasser is winning ALL other poses, besides back....And even in back shot, Nasser hamstrings are better, his legs are a lot bigger and one very important thing that is missing in the photo. CALVES!!!! wich flex had none....

i mean, if your back is better than anyone else, BUT all the other parts are worse, do you win even like that?
Logged
!

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2007, 05:36:15 AM »
Quote from: the shadow on February 07, 2007, 12:29:13 AM
awesome comparison

Flex Wheeler -- ALL THE WAY!!!  8)
Logged

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: FLEX WHEELER vs NASSER:aesthetics vs size(1997)
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2007, 05:49:26 AM »
Quote from: Petrucci on February 08, 2007, 02:48:43 AM
thats what im seeying...Nasser is winning ALL other poses, besides back....And even in back shot, Nasser hamstrings are better, his legs are a lot bigger and one very important thing that is missing in the photo. CALVES!!!! wich flex had none....

i mean, if your back is better than anyone else, BUT all the other parts are worse, do you win even like that?
yep..thats bodybuilding.the past 2 mr olympias,ronnie and yates won the olympi only because of the back and nothing else
Logged
RATM RULZ THE WORLD
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »