Body88: You think its ok to torture animals!!
Devon97: I think its wrong to TORTURE animals but not nearly as bad as doing it to a human.
If I had a choice of a dog be tortured and killed over that of an innocent human being tortured and killed I would choose the dog every time.
The point was no one ever disputed that. Please re read the thread.
Mex reps post, your replyQuote from: Max_Rep on Today at 12:44:36 AM
Throw away the key. There is not
excuse for child, spousal or animal cruelty or neglect.
"So you think animal neglect is just as bad as Child or spousal neglect?"Bsb post and your reply
Quote from: BroadStreetBruiser on Today at 09:49:57 AM
ROFL it's a fucking dog. Sure it's a prick move but christ let's not get the food chain twisted
Exactly, It ALWAYS amazes me how people think animals are their EQUAL!My reply
Exactly, It ALWAYS amazes me how people think animals are their EQUAL!
The point is, a dog left without food and water is defenseless. It is like leaving a small child alone with no food or water. Obviously it is not as bad a leaving a small child home alone, locked up, with no food, or water. That is not what rep was saying. What Artest did such a scumbag move. Wtf did the dog do, to deserve being starved to death? No one was saying it was worse then abusing kids. He was saying people who abuse children, defensless animals or people are scumbags. People who abuse animals (especially pets) are pieces of shit."Throw away the key. There is no excuse for child, spousal or animal cruelty or neglect."
Apparently you cant read "Devon" To you its just a dog, to people who are not total dipshits its an innocent animal that no one has the right to abuse for no reason. Especially a millionaire nba player. No one said it was worse then abusing a small child. He said there was excuse for any of the offenses. Which there isn't. Your reply
You are correct, in that Max Rep did NOT say that it was worse to neglect a dog that a child.
The disturbing thing is that he grouped them all together!
Dogs are animals, if he trapped a racoon and kept it as a pet would it still be a crime? What about an oppossum? What about a rat? What about a toad? What about a grasshopper? Where do we draw the line?My reply
Quote from: Devon97 on Today at 10:44:35 AM
You are correct, in that Max Rep did NOT say that it was worse to neglect a dog that a child.
The disturbing thing is that he grouped them all together!
Dogs are animals, if he trapped a racoon and kept it as a pet would it still be a crime? What about an oppossum? What about a rat? What about a toad? What about a grasshopper? Where do we draw the line?
What the hell are you talking about? Trapping a racoon and keeping it as a pet is not the same as abusing an inocent animal to death. The line is drawn at people who take animals who did nothing to them and torture them to death. This is expecially shitty if the person does it to his own pet.
So what he grouped abusing people and animals together? He did that because there is no excuse to abuse or torture any living thing, for no reason. He never said he should be in jail. He never said Artest should be killed for torturing an animal. He said there was no excuse, which there isn't. Fyi , people who kill and torture puppys, and all that sick shit. More often then not move on to people. Stop trying to rationalize animal cruelty with incoharent babble. The guy said there was no excuse. You think killing puppys for fun is ok, since they are not humans?
Oh brother I can already tell debating you is going to be an experience. The debate was never about which was "worse".
