Author Topic: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue  (Read 4896 times)

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from FEB 2007 issue
« Reply #25 on: February 08, 2007, 10:44:26 PM »
What bothers you is the fct that you have nothing of a body to comment on. So you trash anyone who has achieved what you haven't. You can not see Ronnies stomach in the phtots to comment whether he is bloated or not, so why are you bringing up stomach size??? There is not a single bodybuilder today without a distended ab...get over it already and forget about the bodybuilding world returning to the Shawn Ray vacuum stomach look...IT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!!!!

It is all about the FREAKY SIZE NOW and it is here to stay!

Haha... you're delusioned if you think it's about what I have or haven't accomplished... It's simple... I wouldn't want to look like HIM.

I would love to look like Labrada, Wheeler, Levrone, Ray... TONS of guys, but I wouldn't want to look like him, Cutler, or 1/2 of the other IFBB pros right now because of stomach distention.

Your reasoning makes no sense and if you would read my previous posts... I said I'm not against the FREAKY size... I'm just against the pregnant looking stomachs. Another thing you say is I'm against everyone who's accomplished what I haven't... that makes no sense... I can name tons of guys who look better than me and in my opinion better than Ronnie Coleman and always have.

If you want to walk around looking impregnated... feel free.

There's NOTHING that would make me look like that, and non of the REAL greats in this sport think it's good either..

If big ass guts are your thing though... have at it. It's pretty obvious that you're all about the gut... You've basically stated so.

Oh, and if you think the big guts are good for the sport, you're nuts... Look at how shows are dwindling and less and less people show up... It really does coincide with larger and larger stomachs.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from FEB 2007 issue
« Reply #26 on: February 08, 2007, 11:24:29 PM »
Haha... you're delusioned if you think it's about what I have or haven't accomplished... It's simple... I wouldn't want to look like HIM.

I would love to look like Labrada, Wheeler, Levrone, Ray... TONS of guys, but I wouldn't want to look like him, Cutler, or 1/2 of the other IFBB pros right now because of stomach distention.

Your reasoning makes no sense and if you would read my previous posts... I said I'm not against the FREAKY size... I'm just against the pregnant looking stomachs. Another thing you say is I'm against everyone who's accomplished what I haven't... that makes no sense... I can name tons of guys who look better than me and in my opinion better than Ronnie Coleman and always have.

If you want to walk around looking impregnated... feel free.

There's NOTHING that would make me look like that, and non of the REAL greats in this sport think it's good either..

If big ass guts are your thing though... have at it. It's pretty obvious that you're all about the gut... You've basically stated so.

Oh, and if you think the big guts are good for the sport, you're nuts... Look at how shows are dwindling and less and less people show up... It really does coincide with larger and larger stomachs.

Yes and no. The stomach thing's so common now that brining it up, especially when it's not even evident in those shots, is rather trite not to mention old news. Better you start a thread on BB in general than whine about Ron in particular.

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from FEB 2007 issue
« Reply #27 on: February 08, 2007, 11:27:15 PM »
Yes and no. The stomach thing's so common now that brining it up, especially when it's not even evident in those shots, is rather trite not to mention old news. Better you start a thread on BB in general than whine about Ron in particular.
ronnie has bigger stomach than jay
do you agree with me on this?
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from FEB 2007 issue
« Reply #28 on: February 09, 2007, 12:17:50 AM »
heres some more :o
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

Mobil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3009
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue
« Reply #29 on: February 09, 2007, 01:34:13 AM »
he looks very narrow compared to what he used to be
real men= no rubbers

IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue
« Reply #30 on: February 09, 2007, 02:06:28 AM »
he looks very narrow compared to what he used to be

Maybe he isnt posing and in a middle of exersices that make him squeeze insted of spreading?
Not to mention Ronnie never had wide shoulders,he just had HUGE delts and that was enough.And his delts still look massive.

Moen

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2863
  • Getbig!
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue
« Reply #31 on: February 09, 2007, 04:26:20 AM »
All pics are taken from the right side, looks good for jay  ;D

dearth

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
  • Getbig!
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from FEB 2007 issue
« Reply #32 on: February 09, 2007, 05:28:45 AM »
yes, aware of this, hence quest for sandow number 9.


coleman is competing in this years olympia which means he still on a quest for sandow number 9
flex magazine is misleading you yet again

hope this helps


BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from FEB 2007 issue
« Reply #33 on: February 09, 2007, 07:26:57 AM »
coleman is competing in this years olympia which means he still on a quest for sandow number 9
flex magazine is misleading you yet again

hope this helps



not misleading me. i don't buy the mag.

hope that helped

The_Punisher

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
  • The Unrighteous Shall Pay
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue
« Reply #34 on: February 09, 2007, 08:09:17 AM »
Coleman looks a little slimmer. I doubt he's comming heavy this year. I have him in 270lbs range

Yabuddy

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 74
  • Getbig!
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue
« Reply #35 on: February 09, 2007, 10:30:18 AM »
Shadow, could you please scan the pics of Branch Warren training chest?????

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue
« Reply #36 on: February 09, 2007, 10:33:46 AM »
Shadow, could you please scan the pics of Branch Warren training chest?????
got it from milossarcev.com.i don't have the magazine..
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

slaveboy1980

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8404
  • Thought is the arrow of time; memory never fades.
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue
« Reply #37 on: February 09, 2007, 10:42:17 AM »
:o

in the last 2 pics he looks smaller than earlier years...

the shadow

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 10205
  • THE FLAG OF THE ZAPATISTA ARMY OF LIBERATION
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue
« Reply #38 on: February 09, 2007, 10:43:15 AM »
in the last 2 pics he looks smaller than earlier years...
i know..ronnie is all washed up..theres nothing new about it
RATM RULZ THE WORLD

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: new RONNIE COLEMAN FLEX MAG pics from MARCH 2007 issue
« Reply #39 on: February 09, 2007, 11:27:01 AM »
Yes and no. The stomach thing's so common now that brining it up, especially when it's not even evident in those shots, is rather trite not to mention old news. Better you start a thread on BB in general than whine about Ron in particular.

It is common now...

I don't disagree... I still think it's sad...

However, I can see your point... I won't "white" about him in this any longer. What I was saying was in response to the article headline about the 9th Sandow... but I do see what you are talking about.

I'll let it die... for now.