Technically, are you "wrong" when you post that polar bears have quintupled since the 60's. No
Glad we cleared that up, then. You’ll no doubt apologise for claiming
I was in previous threads. Or not.
your implication was that global warming doesn't exist
I’ve never said Global Warming doesn’t exist; I’ve been cynical about those who claim the debate is over. Stop imagining contentions that aren’t there.
It was subsequently posted that polar bears only flourished due to human intervention, perhaps reinforcing the views of some that intervention is what's needed when it comes to climate control as well. I would call that shooting yourself in the foot.
Would you? If you remember that thread, I never said it was a set in stone certainty that positive human intervention was not helping the Polar Bear numbers. I did, however, post that a warmer climate could, in fact, help the population grow. To date you have not used any evidence to prove this wrong –
perhaps you have the poor aim?
It seems clear the retraction disappeared because the story is in fact true, and not false. Your hope was to bash liberals and debase a left-leaning publication. All you did was call attention to the fact that people associated with Bush and oil industry are dishonest at the very least, perhaps even criminal. I would call that shooting yourself in the foot.
Uh huh, or have you considered they realised just how grave an error it was? Besides, if I post a correction on my website, then remove it, I’m going to say why I stand by my story – I correct my correction. You believe media consensus is a veritable trial by media for the Bush Administration which you love to assume the worst of.
As I said above, were you "wrong" when you entitled your threads. No. Polar bears did flourish within a 40 year period.
Correct, I am right. Thank you for conceding that.
Perhaps (we'll give you the benefit of the doubt) the Independent did retract a story for a day or five minutes or whatever. But what you "intend" by these threads, is wrong. You knowingly mislead... and that's what people don't respect.
Again, you ponder my intentions instead of dealing with (and refuting) the facts I provide. Your ability to debate is atrocious.
Were you wrong when you entitled "Relax - Greenland isn't melting"? Yes. completely. It is melting and there was nothing in the article you posted that refuted this fact in any way.
Deedee, if it’s ice is thicker now than it was in the 1930’s, how can you claim this? Surely it hasn’t meted since this date, and this damages your faith in Global Warming – no wonder you’re upset.
Perhaps you may respect your blogger, but I have to say, I scrolled down and read his holding forth on the lit review from the Saturday Independent, and my reaction was... what an a**hole.
Yes, abuse is what you have been reduced to, a true Leftist indeed.
That's another reason why quoting bloggers isn't a great idea. Aside from the unsubstantiated content, it's a matter of personal opinion as to whether or not the blogger deserves respect.
This is about the most sensible thing you have said, but let’s take it on a blogger by blogger basis, okay?