How Liberals Defend Terrorists......

[OzmO]

Exactly how do they do that?  Please show some concrete evdience and or statments of Liberals defending Terrorist.

I'd like to know....seriously becuase to me that would be outrageous!

I hear people make these accusations all the time but i never really see anything concrete.  please show me.

[ribonucleic]

i never really see anything concrete

That's because it would require, you know, facts. That's not the right-winger's strong suit. 

[Mr. Intenseone]

Exactly how do they do that?  Please show some concrete evdience and or statments of Liberals defending Terrorist.

I'd like to know....seriously becuase to me that would be outrageous!

I hear people make these accusations all the time but i never really see anything concrete.  please show me.

They don't defend it.....they run from it!

[OzmO]

At what point can i officially say "crickets"?     lol

[gtbro1]

They don't defend it.....they run from it!

    Translation: they don't " invent"  reasons to invade another country.

[Dos Equis]

At what point can i officially say "crickets"?     lol

When you first posted the straw man question?  

[OzmO]

When you first posted the straw man question?   

huh?  sorry i'm slow today.

[Dos Equis]

huh?  sorry i'm slow today.

I'm slow every day.     Who said liberals defend terrorists?  Sounds like you're making up a scenario and asking for debate on that made up scenario. 

[OzmO]

I'm slow every day.     Who said liberals defend terrorists?  Sounds like you're making up a scenario and asking for debate on that made up scenario. 

I'm not above doing something like that    but here's where my motivatioin came from:




Quote from: mightymouse72 on Today at 10:40:08 AM

good post beach.
but i think it's moot, they will still defend saddam and terrorists

I hear shit like this all this time.

[Dos Equis]

I'm not above doing something like that    but here's where my motivatioin came from:




Quote from: mightymouse72 on Today at 10:40:08 AM
I hear shit like this all this time.

Ah so.     I'm not above starting and/or participating in straw man discussions also. 

I think mightymouse was probably referring to people posting in that thread, not liberals in general?  I don't blame him for being frustrated and upset after reading all the crap being hurled his way.       

[OzmO]

Ah so.     I'm not above starting and/or participating in straw man discussions also. 

I think mightymouse was probably referring to people posting in that thread, not liberals in general?  I don't blame him for being frustrated and upset after reading all the crap being hurled his way.       

Yeah,  but he's not being very objective either when he down plays the NK threat both militarily and atomically.

and who was defending Saddam and the Terrorist in the thread?  I've never seen anyone, Rib, Beserker, 240, Jeff, etc... do that.  Nor have i seen it on the news.

But it seems discussions sometimes regress to those accusations.   It's like accusing Republicans of not wanting to protect the enviroment.  they all do of course, it's just some people have a differnt idea of how to do it and how soon there will be a problem with it.

[gtbro1]

Yeah,  but he's not being very objective either when he down plays the NK threat both militarily and atomically.

and who was defending Saddam and the Terrorist in the thread?  I've never seen anyone, Rib, Beserker, 240, Jeff, etc... do that.  Nor have i seen it on the news.

But it seems discussions sometimes regress to those accusations.   It's like accusing Republicans of not wanting to protect the enviroment.  they all do of course, it's just some people have a differnt idea of how to do it and how soon there will be a problem with it.

I don't give a shit about the environment.As long as it lasts me another 40 -50 years I'm good.

[Dos Equis]

Yeah,  but he's not being very objective either when he down plays the NK threat both militarily and atomically.

and who was defending Saddam and the Terrorist in the thread?  I've never seen anyone, Rib, Beserker, 240, Jeff, etc... do that.  Nor have i seen it on the news.

But it seems discussions sometimes regress to those accusations.   It's like accusing Republicans of not wanting to protect the enviroment.  they all do of course, it's just some people have a differnt idea of how to do it and how soon there will be a problem with it.

I'm not sure who he was specifically referring to.  Here is one thing he quoted from Jag:

Quote from: jaguarenterprises on February 12, 2007, 04:54:34 PM
Bush didn't confront terrorists. Bush toppled the sovereign nation of Iraq and gave birth to terrorists.
He provided justification for their cause, and validated them in the minds of many wouldbe terrorists.
He spread the seeds for terrorism, as well as hatred and distrust towards America, and watered and fertilized them well. Now everyone is stuck dealing with the weeds that have sprung up.

Certainly a lot of ways you can interpret that quote.  

Then there were numerous insults by 240, calling him stupid and basically accusing him of killing nearly half a million or so Iraqis.  I'm not sure what set him off.  He'd have to comment.  I'm just guessing.  

I don't think Democrats or liberals in general support terrorism.  I DO believe they are going to empower terrorists with their current "no confidence" resolution.  But I guess that's a different issue.    

[OzmO]

I'm not sure who he was specifically referring to.  Here is one thing he quoted from Jag:

Certainly a lot of ways you can interpret that quote.   

Then there were numerous insults by 240, calling him stupid and basically accusing him of killing nearly half a million or so Iraqis.  I'm not sure what set him off.  He'd have to comment.  I'm just guessing.   

I don't think Democrats or liberals in general support terrorism.  I DO believe they are going to empower terrorists with their current "no confidence" resolution.  But I guess that's a different issue.   

Hmmmm,

What's their current "no confidence" resolution?  Is that hteir idea we should just pull out of iraq?

[Debussey]

Hmmmm,

What's their current "no confidence" resolution?  Is that hteir idea we should just pull out of iraq?

What is teh story behind ur nick?

[OzmO]

What is teh story behind ur nick?

I used to play RoR and that was one of my nicks.  I was trying to think of a nick and i was mouthing the name "Azmodian devil"  and i came up with "OzmO"

[Cavalier22]

Well, heres a huge one: trying to undermine the patriot act!

The patriot act is essential for protecting ourselves against terrorists, according to many in the military and defense organizations.

They politicize by saying it takes away freedoms? what freedoms?  Do you know anyone who has had their freedoms taken away by the patriot act? No, you don't. Its just a buncha spin. 

I'm not talking about the Enemy Combatant Law, but the Patriot Act

[OzmO]

Well, heres a huge one: trying to undermine the patriot act!

The patriot act is essential for protecting ourselves against terrorists, according to many in the military and defense organizations.

They politicize by saying it takes away freedoms? what freedoms?  Do you know anyone who has had their freedoms taken away by the patriot act? No, you don't. Its just a buncha spin. 

I'm not talking about the Enemy Combatant Law, but the Patriot Act

How does that support terrorism?

Are you saying that becuase they don;t like a particular "answer or solution" (the patriot act) that makes it as if they are supporting terrorism?

[Dos Equis]

Hmmmm,

What's their current "no confidence" resolution?  Is that hteir idea we should just pull out of iraq?

It's a resolution that says they disagree with Bush's decision to send 20,000 additional troops to Iraq.  There are some Republicans supporting this too, but I think it's the wrong thing to do.  

They don't have the stones to propose and vote on a resolution calling for a pullout.  I'd actually respect them a lot more if they did.  They need to quit dancing around like a bunch of pansies and just do it.  Instead, all we've heard is criticism of whatever Bush proposes.  

[Deedee]

Well, heres a huge one: trying to undermine the patriot act!

The patriot act is essential for protecting ourselves against terrorists, according to many in the military and defense organizations.

They politicize by saying it takes away freedoms? what freedoms?  Do you know anyone who has had their freedoms taken away by the patriot act? No, you don't. Its just a buncha spin. 

I'm not talking about the Enemy Combatant Law, but the Patriot Act

The Patriot Act essentially allows government to control and silence the Media. If the media is shut down, then you have a fascist state. That's what troubles people about it.  

[OzmO]

It's a resolution that says they disagree with Bush's decision to send 20,000 additional troops to Iraq.  There are some Republicans supporting this too, but I think it's the wrong thing to do. 

They don't have the stones to propose and vote on a resolution calling for a pullout.  I'd actually respect them a lot more if they did.  They need to quit dancing around like a bunch of pansies and just do it.  Instead, all we've heard is criticism of whatever Bush proposes. 

I donno BB, it's easy to say adding 20,000 troops wouldn't change anything.  I don;t see how that's empowering terrorist. 

If anything, isn;t BUSH empowering terrorist by not following the reccomendations of the ISG?  You see how that's not exactly correct logic?

[OzmO]

The Patriot Act essentially allows government to control and silence the Media. If the media is shut down, then you have a fascist state. That's what troubles people about it. 

I'm troubled by it if that's the case.

So having a problems with someone's answer makes a supporter of the enemy?   geez.   

[Hugo Chavez]

straw man huh... someone is living in their own little made up world again   Someone who claims to have many liberal friends   I see if he does, it's sure a one sided conversation with them...

It happens all the time, ALL the time, dug this up in a few minutes...



Terrorists’ Best Friends Are The Radical Liberals
By Gordon Bishop (06/07/04

Liberals Hand Terrorists A Victory
By David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com | May 17, 2004


"Liberals become indignant when you question their patriotism, but simultaneously work overtime to give terrorists a cushion for the next attack and laugh at dumb Americans who love their country and hate the enemy." --Ann Coulter

On the October 19 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh declared that the recent surge in insurgent violence in Iraq indicates that "terrorists around the world, particularly those in Iraq, are voting Democrat today."

"Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 in the attacks and prepared for war. Liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers."--Karl Rove

TERRORISTS' BEST FRIENDS
ARE RADICAL LIBERALS
By: Gordon Bishop

Liberals Do The Terrorists’ Bidding
By Kevin D. Korenthal

Liberals and terrorism
TODAY'S COLUMNIST
By Peter Huessy
June 28, 2005
"Was Mr. Rove out of line? Remarkably, he probably understated the case."

[Dos Equis]

I donno BB, it's easy to say adding 20,000 troops wouldn't change anything.  I don;t see how that's empowering terrorist. 

If anything, isn;t BUSH empowering terrorist by not following the reccomendations of the ISG?  You see how that's not exactly correct logic?

I'm not commenting on whether Bush should or shouldn't send 20,000 additional troops.  I actually have very serious reservations about that and his refusal to follow the ISG recommendations and apparently the recommendation of the Joint Chiefs.  What I'm saying is Congress, and primarily the Democrats in Congress, shouldn't be proposing some meaningless resolution that undermines the Commander in Chief while we are in the middle of a war.  I think that empowers terrorists. 

[MidniteRambo]

Exactly how do they do that?  Please show some concrete evdience and or statments of Liberals defending Terrorist.

I'd like to know....seriously becuase to me that would be outrageous!

I hear people make these accusations all the time but i never really see anything concrete.  please show me.

The other day I went home, opened the door and my wife said "Hi, honey, how was your day?"  I then screamed "HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE ME OF CHEATING?  YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF! OUTRAGEOUS."

Somehow, she knew I was up to something.

Translation (since you confess to being "slow" today):  Your protestations speak loudly.