Given the huge opposition to nearly anything the Bush Administration says or does I'm curious if these claims from skeptics will have any longevity. Most people have the impression the Bush Administration cooked to books on the WMD claims, this should get interesting.
"Daniel Serwer, a specialist at the US Institute for Peace, a Washington-based think tank, said he was not convinced that the Iranian government had decided "at the highest levels" to provide weapons to target US troops, as the three US officials told reporters. The question is not so much about whether there are Iranian weapons inside Iraq," said Serwer, who served as executive director of the Iraq Study Group, the bipartisan commission on Iraq. "Sure there are. The question is whether there is a conscious policy by the Iranian government or some part of the Iranian government to support lethal attacks against Americans. I haven't seen any proof of that yet."
"General Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also downplayed accusations against the Iranian government. He told reporters yesterday in Indonesia that although material from Iran had been used in the bombs, "That does not translate that the Iranian government per se, for sure, is directly involved in doing this."
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/13/world/middleeast/13weapons.html?hp&ex=1171429200&en=3faf0e9628ca986a&ei=5094&partner=homepagehttp://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2007/02/14/doubts_raised_on_linking_of_iran_to_us_deaths_in_iraq/
