Author Topic: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....  (Read 17185 times)

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #75 on: February 24, 2007, 03:55:22 AM »
Mmmmmm. If he didnt tore his quads,he could be a Mr.O defenitely.
 I think this back is the best in the BBing history.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9970
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #76 on: February 24, 2007, 05:41:36 AM »
his back double bi is not that great. his lat spread is world class, the back double bi not so much so.


dorian and ronnie have better backs, both have good double bis and lat spreads. plus you have to look at the lower body too.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #77 on: February 24, 2007, 06:01:20 AM »
his back double bi is not that great. his lat spread is world class, the back double bi not so much so.


dorian and ronnie have better backs, both have good double bis and lat spreads. plus you have to look at the lower body too.
agree
choice is an illusion

benjamin pearson

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2437
  • Dan18 has a huge forehead
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #78 on: February 24, 2007, 06:09:11 AM »
Milos.... do you think that back was built with heavy weights.... or hundreds of girly supersets an average 11 year old could do?

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41327
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #79 on: February 24, 2007, 06:23:39 AM »
his back double bi is not that great. his lat spread is world class, the back double bi not so much so.


dorian and ronnie have better backs, both have good double bis and lat spreads. plus you have to look at the lower body too.

Dorian only has one bicep so how can he have a good back double bi?  Dorians best post is the back lat spread and Joel's is better. 
7

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #80 on: February 24, 2007, 06:41:10 AM »
Milos.... do you think that back was built with heavy weights.... or hundreds of girly supersets an average 11 year old could do?
your mommy was pumped numerous times before you popped out...so ...yeah...it takes a lot of repetitions..not to mention the countless loads that were lost down her esophagus... :)

benjamin pearson

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2437
  • Dan18 has a huge forehead
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #81 on: February 24, 2007, 06:42:17 AM »
your mommy was pumped numerous times before you popped out...so ...yeah...it takes a lot of repetitions..not to mention the countless loads that were lost down her esophagus... :)

Ouch..... ::)..... dont you need to go take some roids in order to weigh 160 pounds you useless piece of shit

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9970
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #82 on: February 24, 2007, 06:43:57 AM »
Dorian only has one bicep so how can he have a good back double bi?  Dorians best post is the back lat spread and Joel's is better. 


i agree, dorians back double bi suffers due to poor arms, but so does joels, did i miss something? joels arms are not that great, and his lower body is a mess, so one for dorian.

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #83 on: February 24, 2007, 06:50:42 AM »
The next Mr. O:



Not likely. The chances that a guy at his stage of dev. with legs that far below his upper body, will ever get his legs in proportion are very slim.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 84148
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #84 on: February 24, 2007, 06:56:53 AM »
Dorian only has one bicep so how can he have a good back double bi?  Dorians best post is the back lat spread and Joel's is better. 

Ronnie has NO calves how can he have a good back double bi? learn the criteria it calls specifically calls for one leg extended and the calf flexed , Dorian's biceps may not be as big as Ronnie's but he's NOT lacking anything in this pose , compared to either of them.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #85 on: February 24, 2007, 07:02:11 AM »
admit it nd u hate ronnie coleman bad...
choice is an illusion

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 84148
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #86 on: February 24, 2007, 07:06:11 AM »
admit it nd u hate ronnie coleman bad...

Why because I point out the obvious fact that his calves are lacking in the back double biceps pose? great logic  ::)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #87 on: February 24, 2007, 07:06:50 AM »
Legs lack, but back wide.  Top 5 at most smaller shows, but not top 3.

Below Me

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 649
  • Getbig!
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #88 on: February 24, 2007, 07:15:20 AM »
Milos - has Joel ever considered the Arnold 'display only the weakness' principle?  I'd be wearing shorts and shirt all the time if I were Joel.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #89 on: February 24, 2007, 07:17:34 AM »
Why because I point out the obvious fact that his calves are lacking in the back double biceps pose? great logic  ::)
no because this thread is not even about coleman .. yet u find a way of dissing him on it....
choice is an illusion

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #90 on: February 24, 2007, 07:18:16 AM »
Milos - has Joel ever considered the Arnold 'display only the weakness' principle?  I'd be wearing shorts and shirt all the time if I were Joel.

In this day and age, 1) Training isn't the % that it used to be (thanks to advent of shots and pins) and 2) a guy could lose a lot of marketing dollars by showing weaknesses when others look more complete 3) The internet would quickly shower the guy with a lot of attention for his daisy dukes showing thin legs and he'd never live it down no matter how much size he added.

Those days of Arnold motivating himself are gone.  Guys today are in it for the $ of course, and since most comes from image and reputation, you hide every weakness you can.

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #91 on: February 24, 2007, 07:30:57 AM »
His back double bi:


As great as his back is, his front upper body's even more impressive:

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 84148
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #92 on: February 24, 2007, 07:39:14 AM »
no because this thread is not even about coleman .. yet u find a way of dissing him on it....


Oh so dissing him is stating the obvious , and this thread had nothing to do with Yates but you're no hopping on anyone about that fact or the fat they're ' dissing ' him and his calves suck thats not dissing him thats stating the obvious learn this

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
This guys Back blows Joel Stubb's back away!!
« Reply #93 on: February 24, 2007, 07:40:10 AM »


rjp

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 129
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #94 on: February 24, 2007, 07:41:31 AM »
This guy's got an amazing back, probably one of the best ever, but he sort of reminds me of Tom Platz in the sense that he's got one amazingly freaky bodypart and the rest of him is either average (arms) or below average (legs) with respect to other pros.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #95 on: February 24, 2007, 07:43:02 AM »
if u did look i did state that both coleman and yates.. have better backs than stubbs?

so if someone disses dorian .. you have to restore the balance by dissing coleman...  uh right.... mmmm let me leave you to it then?
choice is an illusion

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: This guys Back blows Joel Stubb's back away!!
« Reply #96 on: February 24, 2007, 07:45:19 AM »
why waste all the space?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 84148
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #97 on: February 24, 2007, 07:49:12 AM »
if u did look i did state that both coleman and yates.. have better backs than stubbs?

so if someone disses dorian .. you have to restore the balance by dissing coleman...  uh right.... mmmm let me leave you to it then?

Again you're under this delusion that stating the obvious is ' dissing ' and its NOT it's a fact and I corrected him about his delusional post that Dorian's biceps hurt his back double biceps pose while Ronnie's blatantly poor calves do and the official criteria specifically calls for one leg back to show a flexed calf , this right here hurts Ronnie's back double biceps pose , period ! you're not working with much on this one .

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
a

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess....
« Reply #99 on: February 24, 2007, 09:07:46 AM »
mmm ok
so
getibigger one says: i wonder if kamali will make the o this year
getbigger2:   i dont know
getbigger 3:  dont know about kamali but branch will definetly qualify
narcissticdiety: coleman has small calves
 ::)
choice is an illusion