Author Topic: JOEL: my back is OK...I guess.... (Read 17174 times)

alexxx · « **Reply #100 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:09:10 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on February 24, 2007, 09:07:46 AM

mmm ok
so
getibigger one says: i wonder if kamali will make the o this year
getbigger2: i dont know
getbigger 3: dont know about kamali but branch will definetly qualify
narcissticdiety: coleman has small calves

Thank you mr. narrator how goes the leg training? When can we see that Ronnie Coleman back of yours?

haider · « **Reply #101 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:11:49 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on February 24, 2007, 09:07:46 AM

mmm ok
so
getibigger one says: i wonder if kamali will make the o this year
getbigger2: i dont know
getbigger 3: dont know about kamali but branch will definetly qualify
narcissticdiety: coleman has small calves

hahaha yes, ND is quite the Dorian guy. If I try to picture him, mike mentzer comes to mind

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #102 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:12:30 AM »

nver claimed a coleman back..
and my leg traing goes the same as my upper body trining... hard and heavy

alexxx · « **Reply #103 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:17:26 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on February 24, 2007, 09:12:30 AM

nver claimed a coleman back..
and my leg traing goes the same as my upper body trining... hard and heavy

haha I am just playin!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #104 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:25:50 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on February 24, 2007, 09:07:46 AM

mmm ok
so
getibigger one says: i wonder if kamali will make the o this year
getbigger2: i dont know
getbigger 3: dont know about kamali but branch will definetly qualify
narcissticdiety: coleman has small calves

Your analogy is way off base I'm right on topic in relation of the subject matter

getbigger one says : his back double bi is not that great. his lat spread is world class, the back double bi not so much so.

dorian and ronnie have better backs, both have good double bis and lat spreads. plus you have to look at the lower body too.

getbigger 2 says :
Dorian only has one bicep so how can he have a good back double bi? Dorians best post is the back lat spread and Joel's is better.

I say : Ronnie has NO calves how can he have a good back double bi? learn the criteria it calls specifically calls for one leg extended and the calf flexed , Dorian's biceps may not be as big as Ronnie's but he's NOT lacking anything in this pose , compared to either of them.

What I said specifically coralates to who has the better back pose(s) so please comprehend before you type or you run the risk of looking stupid

Van_Bilderass · « **Reply #105 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:30:06 AM »

Quote from: donrhummy on February 24, 2007, 06:50:42 AM

Not likely. The chances that a guy at his stage of dev. with legs that far below his upper body, will ever get his legs in proportion are very slim.

Exactly. What you see now is pretty much the pinnacle of his development. The legs will NEVER be in proportion.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #106 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:31:10 AM »

my blurb encompasses more than just this one occurence of you pointing of colemans deficit.. even where not warranted.. no matter what what the argument is about u always seen to drag coleman into it...
look at your 1000+ thread... of dorian vs coleman..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #107 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:37:24 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on February 24, 2007, 09:31:10 AM

my blurb encompasses more than just this one occurence of you pointing of colemans deficit.. even where not warranted.. no matter what what the argument is about u always seen to drag coleman into it...
look at your 1000+ thread... of dorian vs coleman..

Your blurb is WRONG plain and simple and again because I state the obvious you make the leap I hate Coleman , and thats your misinformed interpretation , my opinions are solely directed towards Ronnie's physique , if you can find one single post of me making fun of the way Ronnie speaks or articulates himself then maybe you'd be working with something , but whenever you claim anything to the contrary it will be corrected .

Necrosis · « **Reply #108 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:38:41 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on February 24, 2007, 09:31:10 AM

my blurb encompasses more than just this one occurence of you pointing of colemans deficit.. even where not warranted.. no matter what what the argument is about u always seen to drag coleman into it...
look at your 1000+ thread... of dorian vs coleman..

you were making good points until this one. yes he is dragging coleman into the dorian vs RONNIE debate. that is what the thread is about.

however, he does spazz out a little to much. back DOUBLE BI not back doulble calf. emphasis is placed on particular muscles in a pose, if you think not take away someones back and put great calfs on them, see who wins.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #109 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:40:05 AM »

..nd everybody knows u definetly dont like coleman.. and in that i mean his phisique..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #110 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:48:14 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on February 24, 2007, 09:40:05 AM

..nd everybody knows u definetly dont like coleman.. and in that i mean his phisique..

Ronnie 1996 up to 2001 Arnold Classic had a great physique past that all down hill , 2003 included

420 Diesel · « **Reply #111 on:** February 24, 2007, 10:30:17 AM »

dorian looks has the aesthetics of a pile of rocks wrapped in saran wrap.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #112 on:** February 24, 2007, 10:35:36 AM »

Quote from: 420 Diesel javascript:void(0)
link=topic=130144.msg1847275#msg1847275 date=1172341817

dorian looks has the aesthetics of a pile of rocks wrapped in saran wrap.

Wow monster stating of the obvious , whats next are you going to comment on his biceps not being great

420 Diesel · « **Reply #113 on:** February 24, 2007, 10:37:35 AM »

just trying to get a rise out of you :-)

after watching this forum for a while, i see it's like a game. insult dorian yates anywhere on the board and see how long it takes for your fanboy ass to defend his honor.

i have to wonder, with all your holy crusading in the name of the almighty dorian, how do you have time to breathe?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #114 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:03:35 AM »

Quote from: 420 Diesel on February 24, 2007, 10:37:35 AM

just trying to get a rise out of you :-)

after watching this forum for a while, i see it's like a game. insult dorian yates anywhere on the board and see how long it takes for your fanboy ass to defend his honor.

i have to wonder, with all your holy crusading in the name of the almighty dorian, how do you have time to breathe?

Yawn another Coleman-guy who thinks he's original and how exactly was stating the obvious supposed to ' get a rise out of me ' ? was I supposed to argue to the contrary? you failed on both accounts , keep trying though maybe you'll impress me

420 Diesel · « **Reply #115 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:06:19 AM »

talk to me when your iq reaches room tempurature, numb nuts.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #116 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:07:44 AM »

Quote from: 420 Diesel on February 24, 2007, 11:06:19 AM

talk to me when your iq reaches room tempurature, numb nuts.

You're the one seeking my attention

420 Diesel · « **Reply #117 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:11:16 AM »

the way you dominate the truce thread with mindless rhetoric and illogical ranting got to me. i wanted to start a debate, but i think you're afraid of a superior intillect.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #118 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:14:54 AM »

Quote from: 420 Diesel on February 24, 2007, 11:11:16 AM

the way you dominate the truce thread with mindless rhetoric and illogical ranting got to me. i wanted to start a debate, but i think you're afraid of a superior intillect.

Mindless rhetoric and illogical ranting you just described all the Coleman fans on that thread lol and start the debate chances are you can't offer up anything that has been addressed and or dismissed before , and challenges to my intellect on an internet message board lol wow how original

Condor · « **Reply #119 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:19:19 AM »

This coming from a guy who's handle translates into "weed engine."

420 Diesel · « **Reply #120 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:22:16 AM »

i disagree yet again, but i guess i'm going to keep it in the truce thread. you dance around issues and over complicate the judging criteria, when everyone knows the sum is more important than the parts. i shouldn't have instigated this here, but you guys don't seem to stay on topic in the other thread. the thread is constantly shifting from valid argumentation to childish "owning," and i think you're mostly responsible for that.

420 Diesel · « **Reply #121 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:23:38 AM »

Quote from: Condor on February 24, 2007, 11:19:19 AM

This coming from a guy who's handle translates into "weed engine."

i love blunts and i love to work out. I'm also a well rounded person who doesn't obsess with any one aspect of my life. tell me what's wrong with that?

Condor · « **Reply #122 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:24:39 AM »

Quote from: 420 Diesel on February 24, 2007, 11:23:38 AM

i love blunts and i love to work out. I'm also a well rounded person who doesn't obsess with any one aspect of my life. tell me what's wrong with that?

what's wrong is that if you're a bodybuilder you have to be obsessed with your body or you'll never make it.

420 Diesel · « **Reply #123 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:24:55 AM »

actually, i have to admit, ithink weed engine sounds pretty cool lol.

420 Diesel · « **Reply #124 on:** February 24, 2007, 11:25:50 AM »

Quote from: Condor on February 24, 2007, 11:24:39 AM

what's wrong is that if you're a bodybuilder you have to be obsessed with your body or you'll never make it.

i have no aspirations (or delusions) of becoming a professional bodybuilder. i do think i have good genetics for it, but it would take away from so many other aspects of my life.