Author Topic: do you think JAY has a BIGGER back than STUBBS? (Read 3868 times)

the shadow · « **on:** February 24, 2007, 07:12:30 AM »

size wise jay smokes him

240 is Back · « **Reply #1 on:** February 24, 2007, 07:13:10 AM »

I was up all night worrying about this.

I'm glad someone finally gave this issue the attention it deserves.

benjamin pearson · « **Reply #2 on:** February 24, 2007, 07:13:33 AM »

well who would you rather fuck him or markus ruhl

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #3 on:** February 24, 2007, 07:14:16 AM »

Nope Joel has a bigger back , he's taller and his back looks insanely wide and thick

dizzleman06 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 24, 2007, 07:15:52 AM »

Jay's back is not near as freaky, no where close

the shadow · « **Reply #5 on:** February 24, 2007, 07:16:26 AM »

Quote from: dizzleman06 on February 24, 2007, 07:15:52 AM

Jay's back is not near as freaky, no where close

i am just saying size wise...not detail wise

Dballn247 · « **Reply #6 on:** February 24, 2007, 07:17:34 AM »

I think stubbs has a bigger back, Jay has a better physique.

gymrat3082 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 24, 2007, 07:19:30 AM »

someone post some picks of both of them and lets compare

donrhummy · « **Reply #8 on:** February 24, 2007, 07:27:46 AM »

No way. Stubbs is taller and his back is friggin' huge for his frame.

affy · « **Reply #9 on:** February 24, 2007, 07:36:20 AM »

not even close

the width and the detail can barely be matched by a peak ronnie coleman or dorian yates

however, jay smokes him overall

/thread

Scimowser · « **Reply #10 on:** February 24, 2007, 08:54:37 AM »

not even close and Jays my favouriter BBer. Joel from the waist up is almost unbeatable, but his quad tears stop him from making the progress he could have

slaveboy1980 · « **Reply #11 on:** February 24, 2007, 08:56:05 AM »

stubbs back is bigger than jays ..stubbs structure is bigger than jays too

the shadow · « **Reply #12 on:** February 24, 2007, 08:56:25 AM »

Quote from: Scimowser on February 24, 2007, 08:54:37 AM

not even close and Jays my favouriter BBer. Joel from the waist up is almost unbeatable, but his quad tears stop him from making the progress he could have

come on dude.jay has better legs,better delts,better chest,better arms...stubbs is just one huge back and nothing else

G o a t b o y · « **Reply #13 on:** February 24, 2007, 08:57:43 AM »

Quote from: the shadow on February 24, 2007, 08:34:17 AM

...i like trannies

the shadow · « **Reply #14 on:** February 24, 2007, 08:58:08 AM »

Quote from: G o a t b o y on February 24, 2007, 08:57:43 AM

yes i do so what

240 is Back · « **Reply #15 on:** February 24, 2007, 08:58:29 AM »

I can't believe CNN or any of the other "mainsteam media" haven't covered this ever-heating debate.

Scimowser · « **Reply #16 on:** February 24, 2007, 08:59:29 AM »

Joel is about 8" taller than Jay and has more mass. It is very, very hard to fill a frame that big. Its not like Stubbs has small arms! Hes emormous, but overall Jay dominates him. People go on about Branch packing all that size onto his frame, but Jay has more mass than even Branch could cope with. If Joel had comparable legs in regards to his upperbody then it could be a different story

SAMSON123 · « **Reply #17 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:17:14 AM »

Quote from: the shadow on February 24, 2007, 07:12:30 AM

size wise jay smokes him

JAY LOOKS LIKE SHIT...ESPECIALLY THIS CELLULITE ASS HE HAS...HE IS WIDE IN THE WAIST, WIDE ASS, NO GLUTE DEFINEMNET, HIS BACK IS SHAPELESS AND WITHOUT DETAIL, HIS LEGS ARE UNEVEN TO A VERY NOTICABLE AMOUNT, HIS HAMS ARE MESSY LOOKING AND HIS FACE LOOKS LIKE HE HAS BEEN BEAT TWICE WITH A FIFTY POUND BAG OF NICKELS. sTUBBS OR RONNIE BEAT THE ROIDS OUT OF JAY ANY DAY OF THE WEEK. ADD TO THIS I JUST SAW A VID OF STUBBS AT THREE HUNDRED POUNDS AND THE DUDE WAS CUT AND DEFINED AT THAT WEIGHT...AMAZING

the shadow · « **Reply #18 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:18:40 AM »

Quote from: SAMSON123 on February 24, 2007, 09:17:14 AM

JAY LOOKS LIKE SHIT...ESPECIALLY THIS CELLULITE ASS HE HAS...HE IS WIDE IN THE WAIST, WIDE ASS, NO GLUTE DEFINEMNET, HIS BACK IS SHAPELESS AND WITHOUT DETAIL, HIS LEGS ARE UNEVEN TO A VERY NOTICABLE AMOUNT, HIS HAMS ARE MESSY LOOKING AND HIS FACE LOOKS LIKE HE HAS BEEN BEAT TWICE WITH A FIFTY POUND BAG OF NICKELS. sTUBBS OR RONNIE BEAT THE ROIDS OUT OF JAY ANY DAY OF THE WEEK. ADD TO THIS I JUST SAW A VID OF STUBBS AT THREE HUNDRED POUNDS AND THE DUDE WAS CUT AND DEFINED AT THAT WEIGHT...AMAZING

i see you hate jay cutler alot... $:-\$

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #19 on:** February 24, 2007, 09:26:39 AM »

stubs has a bigger back... but jay def hasthe better phsique by far
stubs has no legs...
and even worse.... no arms
nothing is worse than a bb with no arms.. because that is the first bodypart people notice

Wombat · « **Reply #20 on:** February 26, 2007, 12:07:53 AM »

Quote from: SAMSON123 on February 24, 2007, 09:17:14 AM

JAY LOOKS LIKE SHIT...ESPECIALLY THIS CELLULITE ASS HE HAS...HE IS WIDE IN THE WAIST, WIDE ASS, NO GLUTE DEFINEMNET, HIS BACK IS SHAPELESS AND WITHOUT DETAIL, HIS LEGS ARE UNEVEN TO A VERY NOTICABLE AMOUNT, HIS HAMS ARE MESSY LOOKING AND HIS FACE LOOKS LIKE HE HAS BEEN BEAT TWICE WITH A FIFTY POUND BAG OF NICKELS. sTUBBS OR RONNIE BEAT THE ROIDS OUT OF JAY ANY DAY OF THE WEEK. ADD TO THIS I JUST SAW A VID OF STUBBS AT THREE HUNDRED POUNDS AND THE DUDE WAS CUT AND DEFINED AT THAT WEIGHT...AMAZING

i have been critical of jay in the past but Stubbs isn't even in Jay's league...Stubbs belongs in a wheel chair...Jay deserved his olympia placing and after watching some of his videos on here from youtube, im a Jay fan...The guy seems cool as shit and very laid back...

AVBG · « **Reply #21 on:** February 26, 2007, 12:42:29 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on February 24, 2007, 08:58:29 AM

I can't believe CNN or any of the other "mainsteam media" haven't covered this ever-heating debate.

lol

tu_holmes · « **Reply #22 on:** February 26, 2007, 01:03:31 AM »

Quote from: AVBG on February 26, 2007, 12:42:29 AM

lol

I'm pretty sure i saw this covered on C-SPAN, right after they finished a congressional vote tally.

hangclean · « **Reply #23 on:** February 26, 2007, 01:34:07 AM »

beat with a fifty pound bag of nickels?

growthfactor · « **Reply #24 on:** February 26, 2007, 01:52:43 AM »

Quote from: affy on February 24, 2007, 07:36:20 AM

not even close

the width and the detail can barely be matched by a peak ronnie coleman or dorian yates

however, jay smokes him overall

/thread

ok there expert!... detail is only 'alright'... have you seen those pics of his back dbl bi? not impressive.