No it wont idiot.
GH stay in the body for several hours,same for Clen.
So if you know when the test is gonna happen no one can detect it.
Further more,even if you detect GH in your system its hard to determine if its from usage or natural,it have to be REALLY high.And GH remaind high for only a few hours.
Unlike steroids,GH doesnt leave traces after its absorbed,there are no extra metabolits floating in the body.
Kindly STFU and leave the training, diet and science to me and stop getting your info from "Steriods.com"
From Medscape Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
Expert Interview
To Dope or Not to Dope: That is the Ethical Question -- Part 1: An Expert Interview With Dick Pound
Posted
Richard Pound
Following on the heels of Dr. Garnier's impassioned plea and open letter, Medscape continues its discussions regarding the ethics surrounding the use of performance-enhancing drugs. Pippa Wysong of Medscape begins the first of our 2-part interview series with the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) by sitting down with Richard Pound. Mr. Pound is the Chair of the WADA, chair of the Olympic Games Study Commission, and Chancellor of McGill University in Montreal, Canada.
Pound was a swimmer and won a gold, 2 silvers, and a bronze medal for Canada at the 1962 Commonwealth Games in Australia, and was a double finalist at the 1960 Olympics in Rome.
He is also a Montreal tax lawyer and chartered accountant, and author of the book Inside the Olympics: A Behind-the-Scene Look at the Politics, the Scandals, and the Glory of the Games.
Charles Kearns, PhD
Editorial Director
Medscape Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
ckearns@medscape.net
Medscape: Dr. Garnier, the Medical Director of WADA, recently posted a letter addressed to doctors who support doping in sports. What happened to prompt this?
Mr. Pound: Many of the substances used for performance enhancement are prescription drugs — athletes are getting them from somewhere on the basis of prescriptions written by doctors. Dr. Garnier just felt it was a timely and useful thing to do to draw attention to the problem.
Medscape: Why would any doctors support doping in sports? What are some of the reasons you've heard?
Mr. Pound: There are a whole bunch of self-serving justifications. A lot of it is about money — many of these treatments are very expensive. Some say it's safer to do it under medical supervision than not. It's all complete nonsense. They know their patients, they know what their patients do for a living or in nonprofessional sports. And they know whether they're providing something that is a prohibited substance or method. I think there's an ethical duty on the part of physicians to not do this sort of thing.
Medscape: It sounds like WADA's testing procedures are pretty sophisticated. Is it true that anybody who is tested is likely to get caught?
Mr. Pound: The tests are getting better. Most of these doping substances and methods have been around for quite a while, so we've become pretty good at testing for them. We're pretty much on top of some of the newer ones, and there are now tests for things like erythropoietin (EPO) and human growth hormone (HGH). The science inherent in the tests is pretty well accepted, although there are predictable challenges and defenses on the part of anybody who has been caught. They try everything, they say it's not their sample, it wasn't sealed properly, the chain of custody is wrong, the test is no good, the substance was naturally produced. It's almost like there's some kind of checklist that's very predictable; we've heard it all before.
The thing is, we know the science before we put any test out there. We do our best to make sure it's scientifically reliable. We don't want to sanction some athlete for doping unless we're really quite certain that's what happened.
Medscape: So, science is making it pretty tough to cheat.
Mr. Pound: It is certainly making it tougher. We've got better tests, plus
