« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Which muscle/physique type would you prefer to have?  (Read 1679 times)

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Which muscle/physique type would you prefer to have?
« on: February 27, 2007, 03:10:50 PM »
Would you rather be a Paul Dillett (where you're friggin insane huge when standing there but when you pose, you don't looks so impressive) or Phil heath (where you look good standing there but your muscles pop and look more impressive when you pose)?

Just Standing there:




Posing:



Just Standing There:



Posing:

Logged

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22153
  • #EarlToo
Re: Which muscle/physique type would you prefer to have?
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2007, 03:38:55 PM »
paul

E
Logged
E

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Which muscle/physique type would you prefer to have?
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2007, 03:41:03 PM »
Dillet by a mile.

I fail to see what is impressive at all about Heath.

He weighs about 215 with the clavicle width of a female.
Logged

swilkins1984

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Which muscle/physique type would you prefer to have?
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2007, 03:41:52 PM »
Phil. More marketable and he can buy clothes in a normal store  ;D
Logged

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Which muscle/physique type would you prefer to have?
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2007, 03:42:13 PM »
Paul, definitely.
Logged

wolfgang187

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1703
  • My power is discombobulatingly & devastating!
Re: Which muscle/physique type would you prefer to have?
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2007, 03:43:08 PM »
Phil heath
Logged

MisterMagoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5591
  • And now, what joy will I have left to live for?
Re: Which muscle/physique type would you prefer to have?
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2007, 03:43:59 PM »
paul's waist is the same size as phil's and he weighed 70 pounds more. no contest.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »