Author Topic: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.  (Read 25401 times)

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.
« Reply #75 on: March 11, 2007, 08:43:09 PM »

So do something about it. 


Help me find free pictures for the Pro-Bodybuilder articles. PM the pro's on this site and ask them if they will post a copyright free picture here. Or E-mail them and ask them if they will provide you one via E-mail that YOU can post here for me.
They are all just jealous.

beatmaster

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2819
  • Save a tree, eat a beaver
Re: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.
« Reply #76 on: March 11, 2007, 08:49:12 PM »

their is a lot of real natural pro bodybuilders outhere, don't you think they should have their picture before you adam?

this is not jalousy, its how it should be!!!
are you delusional?

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.
« Reply #77 on: March 11, 2007, 08:50:47 PM »
their is a lot of real natural pro bodybuilders outhere, don't you think they should have their picture before you adam?

this is not jalousy, its how it should be!!!

I am a great Lifetime Natural Bodybuilder, no reason not to have me featured on there.

I assume you don`t even compare, hence the reluctance to send your own picture.

beatmaster

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2819
  • Save a tree, eat a beaver
Re: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.
« Reply #78 on: March 11, 2007, 08:57:20 PM »
I am a great Lifetime Natural Bodybuilder, no reason not to have me featured on there.

I assume you don`t even compare, hence the reluctance to send your own picture.

you are not a pro!

and i don't need to compare, my ego is ok! ............. a lot of other natural pro look much much much ''did i said much....... yessss'' than you!!!
are you delusional?

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.
« Reply #79 on: March 11, 2007, 09:11:28 PM »
you are not a pro!

and i don't need to compare, my ego is ok! ............. a lot of other natural pro look much much much ''did i said much....... yessss'' than you!!!
Do you look better though?  Just a question.

beatmaster

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2819
  • Save a tree, eat a beaver
Re: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.
« Reply #80 on: March 11, 2007, 09:16:12 PM »

are you trying to get into me adam......... won't work, and frankly i don't give a shit!!!

i never said i was like a pro!!!
are you delusional?

wolfgang187

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1703
  • My power is discombobulatingly & devastating!
I took down his picture, let this thread die now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #81 on: March 11, 2007, 09:17:18 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodybuilding                                           




I took down his picture on wikipedia.   let this thread die.

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: This is very wrong!
« Reply #82 on: March 11, 2007, 09:18:15 PM »
Awesome picture.


Cavalier22

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3309
  • Citizens! The Fatherland is in Danger
Re: This is very wrong!
« Reply #83 on: March 11, 2007, 09:20:45 PM »
It was announced in a private meeting with BodyStars that because Vince McMahon was under federal suspicion for steroid distribution, the second competition would have to be drug-free. Former television personality and bodybuilder Lou Ferrigno had just signed with the WBF and immediately left the company upon hearing this news.

Valhalla awaits.

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: This is very wrong!
« Reply #84 on: March 11, 2007, 09:22:30 PM »
It was announced in a private meeting with BodyStars that because Vince McMahon was under federal suspicion for steroid distribution, the second competition would have to be drug-free. Former television personality and bodybuilder Lou Ferrigno had just signed with the WBF and immediately left the company upon hearing this news.



LOL, you mean big lou couldn't come in at more then 215 without gear?

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: This is very wrong!
« Reply #85 on: March 11, 2007, 09:24:50 PM »

Bast000

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 8144
  • Team Malk-Gallon
Re: This is very wrong!
« Reply #86 on: March 11, 2007, 09:29:57 PM »
That is very right.

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: This is very wrong - Wikipedia Bodybuilding?
« Reply #87 on: March 11, 2007, 09:38:05 PM »
Which mod is protecting TA so much today?  ???
Perhaps people are tired of the jealousy.

McFarland

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7930
  • Tastes Like WINNING
Re: This is very wrong - Wikipedia Bodybuilding?
« Reply #88 on: March 11, 2007, 09:53:09 PM »
Ha ha ha ha...it's gonna be real interesting when that Wikipedia bodybuilding article essentially unfolds into the best online, open-source World Anabolic Review we've ever had access to.    ;D

beatmaster

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2819
  • Save a tree, eat a beaver
Re: This is very wrong - Wikipedia Bodybuilding?
« Reply #89 on: March 11, 2007, 10:01:17 PM »

Scroll down??? and?
are you delusional?

Wikidudeman

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 214
  • Nu mă, Nu mă iei!
Re: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.
« Reply #90 on: March 11, 2007, 10:33:58 PM »
The picture is still there. The person who took it down claimed the reason was that the person in it "isn't natural". This isn't valid. You need to provide proof that the person isn't natural. (On the talkpage of the article). The image will stay up until then. If you keep trying to remove it it's considered vandalism and you could be banned.

onlyme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Don't Fuck With Bears
Re: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.
« Reply #91 on: March 11, 2007, 10:37:56 PM »
There should be a pic of Apenis on their just to have a comical view and to show people what a concentration camp survivor looks like. 

onlyme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Don't Fuck With Bears
Re: Wikipedia Pro-Bodybuilders profiles. Please help me improve them.
« Reply #92 on: March 12, 2007, 01:28:44 AM »
hahaha you put a picture of a guy who used to take roids and isn't even a bodybuilder and looks like shit.  Good job.  It shows you know nothing

Princess L

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • I stop for turtles
Wikipedia has NO credibility
« Reply #93 on: March 12, 2007, 11:55:09 AM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodybuilding

Just goes to show ya ANYONE can put ANYTHING on it.
:

haider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11978
  • Team Batman Squats
Re: Wikipedia has NO credibility
« Reply #94 on: March 12, 2007, 11:56:08 AM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodybuilding

Just goes to show ya ANYONE can put ANYTHING on it.
yea...

I think thats kinda what the idear is  :-\


you're allowed to edit if u want  ;)
follow the arrows

ozman

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1422
Re: Wikipedia has NO credibility
« Reply #95 on: March 12, 2007, 11:59:45 AM »
some pages are blocked from editing due to vandalism

i used to have fun with a certain radio stations page for a while

Mike

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1729

danielson

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16640
  • Basile likes young lads
Re: Wikipedia has NO credibility
« Reply #97 on: March 12, 2007, 12:07:00 PM »
E

haider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11978
  • Team Batman Squats
Re: Wikipedia has NO credibility
« Reply #98 on: March 12, 2007, 12:08:08 PM »
follow the arrows

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Wikipedia has NO credibility
« Reply #99 on: March 12, 2007, 12:08:36 PM »
Treat Wikipedia like you treat any research material...BEcayse all of it is edited by people...If it isnt cited then dont give it too much credit.