Author Topic: Lee Haney VS Brian Buchanan (Read 8114 times)

monstercalves · « **on:** March 12, 2007, 08:52:04 AM »

looks like brian had more potential ....

they're also very similar....discuss

rccs · « **Reply #1 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:01:04 AM »

Brian had better biceps and quads!

Andre Nickatina · « **Reply #2 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:03:04 AM »

This pic never gets old

kyomu · « **Reply #3 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:03:48 AM »

Lee is million times better. His muscle was dense. Brian didnt have hard look.

monstercalves · « **Reply #4 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:06:14 AM »

hmmmmmm

brian had better arms, that wouldnt be too hard

legs....i cant say for sure not seen em from enough angles

need to see some late 80s olympias on vid

if brian nailed his conditioning(not that it was bad),and brought up his legs/back....he would ruin haney

monstercalves · « **Reply #5 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:07:32 AM »

a million times better......naaaaaa i dont think so

ieffinhatecardio · « **Reply #6 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:20:19 AM »

Buchanan's biceps are fantastic and his waist is minuscule. He was a freak.

Need more pics of the same poses to do a fair comparison.

BEAST 8692 · « **Reply #7 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:21:01 AM »

potential doesn't win you contests.

find a shot of them side by side on stage and you'll see what i mean.

kyomu · « **Reply #8 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:21:53 AM »

Quote from: monstercalves on March 12, 2007, 09:07:32 AM

a million times better......naaaaaa i dont think so

You must see Videos. Period.

monstercalves · « **Reply #9 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:24:58 AM »

Quote from: kyomu on March 12, 2007, 09:21:53 AM

You must see Videos. Period.

yep ur right

Saxon · « **Reply #10 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:26:08 AM »

Quote from: Andre Nickatina on March 12, 2007, 09:03:04 AM

This pic never gets old

I first saw that cover last year, unbelievable, never seen a better cover shot for a bbing mag!

kyomu · « **Reply #11 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:28:49 AM »

Quote from: monstercalves on March 12, 2007, 09:24:58 AM

yep ur right

I recommend you to see 1988 and 1989. Beside of these two, you will be surprised how people pose good.
BBers of now look stupid in front of them.

kyomu · « **Reply #12 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:32:06 AM »

Here you go

monstercalves · « **Reply #13 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:32:35 AM »

i agree

posing has went to shit

nobody holds the pose long enough and nobody can control their breathing anymore

and you've got guys wearing costumes....lee priest,coleman,melvin anthony,kamali.....

this fukn costume thing is a defo no no!!!

its simply nuffin to do with bodybuilding, the physique is to be looked at not covered up like some fukn stripper

kyomu · « **Reply #14 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:35:42 AM »

Then best Lee haney

&mode=related&search=

monstercalves · « **Reply #15 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:35:46 AM »

ffs man legs are so small

kyomu · « **Reply #16 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:39:39 AM »

Quote from: monstercalves on March 12, 2007, 09:35:46 AM

ffs man legs are so small

Yes.Thats why his waist is also small. Waist size and huge legs are relative.

crc69 · « **Reply #17 on:** March 12, 2007, 01:52:57 PM »

Without drugs =>

240 is Back · « **Reply #18 on:** March 12, 2007, 01:57:28 PM »

brian has a sick waist.

But Haney beats him on overall muscle shape and superior bellies.

bigkubby · « **Reply #19 on:** March 12, 2007, 08:55:24 PM »

haney has some bitch arms i dont see how he got by with 8 olympias with those stringbean arms. i guess our standards were lower then my arms are bigger than haneys what a puss hes not that impressive just his waist and back arnold crushes him in my book.

BEAST 8692 · « **Reply #20 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:25:30 PM »

Quote from: bigkubby on March 12, 2007, 08:55:24 PM

haney has some bitch arms i dont see how he got by with 8 olympias with those stringbean arms. i guess our standards were lower then my arms are bigger than haneys what a puss hes not that impressive just his waist and back arnold crushes him in my book.

your arms are bigger?

cool, they're probably more ripped aswell right?

don't suppose you'd show us a pic to prove you're not just another key board dreamer hey?

...no, i didn't think so.

tommywishbone · « **Reply #21 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:45:17 PM »

Haney v. Buchanan...

Haney won everything.

Buchanan won nothing.

fearANDloathing · « **Reply #22 on:** March 13, 2007, 05:35:14 AM »

Quote from: monstercalves on March 12, 2007, 08:52:04 AM

looks like brian had more potential ....

they're also very similar....discuss

WTF kinda question is that

One has 8 Sandows, the other has ZERO!
Case closed.
NEXT......

monstercalves · « **Reply #23 on:** March 13, 2007, 05:51:00 AM »

well i seem to think its a good question otherwise i wouldnt have asked for ppls opinions...

coz hes got 8 sandows does that mean he had more potential than brian buchanan/flex wheeler/big louie/chris cormier/paul dillet?

no i dont think so.....its just that he got it together and won the damn thing...

big louie could have in theory held the title from 76 till god knows....maybe till dorian came along

local hero · « **Reply #24 on:** March 13, 2007, 11:05:07 AM »

big lou had one of the worst physiques ever, im sure even little frank zane would have beat him yr after yr too