That being said, Newt should've learned by now that America was built by residents of our 'ghettos'.
I do not support bilingual education initiatives, however. It would be a mistake to cater to our Spanish-speaking population in that way. It would be UNAMERICAN, and people come from all over the world to become Americans. We need bilingual instructors, but only for the purpose of bridging the communication gap.
English only on the ballots. English only on the money. English only on the highways.
Tre
I understand your sentiments. I wasn't considering "bi-lingual education" per se, simply initiatives to bridge the communication gap, ...but now that you mention it, ...I think bi-lingual education might be a very good thing for Americans. Especially when you consider the Superhighway that is about to occur bridging the North American continent. Let me ask you... who do you think will benefit... and who do you think will be disadvantaged by such a scenario? When companies span the continent, do you not think it would be those conversant in all the languages of that continent that will be running things? That means... unless native born Americans (and no I am neither now, nor have I ever been referring to native aboriginal Americans) are able to communicate in all the languages of that continent, they will not rise past the new "tongue" ceiling. Take a lesson from Canada. We went through it with Francophone / Anglophone / bi-lingual speakers, and the bilinguals won out most every time. There are serious economic benefits to a nation that has a large percentage of their population fluent in other languages. Off the top of my head, the Quebec film industry comes to mind. Did you know that the province of Quebec is the largest exporter of French language media ...IN THE WORLD? They produce more than France itself, ...and please... no French jokes ...it's pretty stale at this point, ...but seriously. Now consider the size of the hispanic population... not just in America, ...but on the PLANET. You speak of American ingenuity... well consider what American ingenuity, fluent in Spanish could produce and export to Mexico, Spain, Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Venezuela, Chilé etc., etc., etc.,
And as for highway signs in ENGLISH ONLY... I think such a policy is just plain myopic if not stupid.
The entire world uses easily understandable and recognizeable symbols for good reason.
Cars most often travel upwards of 80 - 100 kms /per hr. The last thing anyone needs is someone making a stupid move because they didn't understand the written words on the road signs. People behind the wheel of a car should not have to rack their brains trying to figure out what a sign says. Better they be able to merely glance at it and have the image compute in an instant, so they can focus their attention on the task at hand, ...namely the safe operation of that vehicle. What's wrong with a highway sign that shows a pic of a gas pump, or a pic of a dinner plate with knife & fork? Those are universal symbols understood by most people from most countries. I'm sure you'd agree the last thing you want is some tourist veering across 3 lanes of traffic, possibly cutting you off or crashing into you, or causing you to ignite a multi-car pile up with vehicle after vehicle rear-ending you while he drives away, ...because he all of a sudden he realized he was about to miss his exit. He drives away oblivious to the havoc he has just wreaked because he's trying to figure out the next road sign.
My cousins on my mom's side had a bilingual education of sorts. From grades 2 - 5 they were in French immersion. Which meant they were educated solely in French. Every subject in school, was taught to them in the French language. Today, they are fluent in both English & French, as well German & Swedish. The older one is also fluent in Croatian as well. Despite his marketable skills, without his many language abilities, he would never have been able to move to Croatia and start a business there with his fiancé... a business that was all the more opportune
because of the additional language skills they had.
Do you really want American children to be disadvantaged in the years to come? As a nation, you really should consider bi-lingual education as a sound investment in America's future. The rest of the world has already come to this realization, and have been investing in the future of their children by affording them the tools with which to navigate a global economy with greater ease. Don't do it for illegal immigrants, do it for native born American children.