explain.
Yeah, that was one my more Michael Stipe-y posts.
I was looking at the picture of that trashed bridge and wondering if it - in conjunction with the Green Zone bombing - would come to be seen by historians as the "Tet Offensive" moment in this Vietnam-all-over-again. The dramatic, unexpected counterblow that made the hopelessness so obvious that even the most-trusted person on TV would be moved to say from their media pulpit that the war is unwinnable. [Imagine the impact of Oprah saying it today - that's what it was like in the 60s when Cronkite said it.]
Then I thought, "Well, no - that doesn't hold up. A lot of American soldiers were killed in the Tet Offensive. And no Americans were even wounded this time... No, the equivalent of the Tet Offensive in this war would be something like a successful urban ambush of an American patrol - followed by a Somali-like defilement of the American casualties by the neighborhood Iraqis in an eruption of hatred after suffering years of arrogant occupation."
And then I thought, "Well, that could definitely happen at this point, couldn't it."
And finally I thought, "Well, it probably
will happen sooner or later if we stay there long enough."
So my earlier post was a cryptic way of wondering when that might be.
Is anyone here old enough to remember the late 70s when the word "Vietnam" was too depressing a word to be used in polite conversation?
That's what the word "Iraq" is going to be like for us for the next 20 years.