Author Topic: Who would win a fight between Franco Columbo and Steven Seagal? (Read 5993 times)

Bluto · « **on:** May 15, 2007, 07:10:13 AM »

Remember before you answer that Franco used to be a BOXER and he's strong as a BULL

Steven Seagal, well he need to further introduction. Guy is tough as nails.

3Dkiller · « **Reply #1 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:12:40 AM »

easy Steven seagal.. because he knows the techniques and moves

davidpaul · « **Reply #2 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:13:02 AM »

Seagal,

anyone seen ritchie?

Bluto · « **Reply #3 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:13:26 AM »

Hmm yes SS do know a lot of moves... that's a good observation, but still... Franco... the man is a BULL, he lifted a car in Pumping Iron and was a BOXER

Kwon · « **Reply #4 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:14:20 AM »

Steve got height and reach-advantage as well as skill-advantage.

If Franco could take Stevie down with a double-leg though, you would see the Sardinian Ground n Pound in effect.

Bluto · « **Reply #5 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:15:49 AM »

Franco is like a Matt Hughes on steroids... think Matt Hughes and 3x the strength and 2x the speed... then you got Franco

swilkins1984 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:15:56 AM »

Thats right Franco was a successful boxer and in his hey day I sure he was no easy win. Or he could just get Seagal under a 500lb bench press.

ButtonMan · « **Reply #7 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:16:22 AM »

Whoever had the best moustache wins

Lundgren · « **Reply #8 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:16:53 AM »

5'4" and 6'4" seems like a very entertaining fight.

Kwon · « **Reply #9 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:21:47 AM »

Quote from: Lundgrenisgod on May 15, 2007, 07:16:53 AM

5'4" and 6'4" seems like a very entertaining fight.

If Franco have no knowledge of takedowns at all, i just see this fight becoming very one-sided.

Bluto · « **Reply #10 on:** May 15, 2007, 07:23:05 AM »

But what do we know about Stevens takedowns? I've seen pretty much all his films and I don't think he takes it to the ground often does he?

Kwon · « **Reply #11 on:** May 15, 2007, 08:39:06 AM »

If Franco has no groundgame, Steven does not need any.

It is not Steve who needs to take Franco down, it is Franco who needs to take Steve down due to Steves reach-advantage standing up.

If it's standup, i bet on Steve. Too much of a height-advantage and long arms and legs.

Bluto · « **Reply #12 on:** May 15, 2007, 08:40:12 AM »

Good points. This is one of the more interesting match ups to come out of my mastermind in a long time!

Royalty · « **Reply #13 on:** May 15, 2007, 08:59:37 AM »

Franco can take anyone (yes even Chuck Norris).

Bluto · « **Reply #14 on:** May 15, 2007, 09:00:19 AM »

Whatabout God? Who of them has God in his corner?

GreatFinn · « **Reply #15 on:** May 15, 2007, 09:09:41 AM »

Quote from: swilkins1984 on May 15, 2007, 07:15:56 AM

Thats right Franco was a successful boxer and in his hey day I sure he was no easy win. Or he could just get Seagal under a 500lb bench press.

When...where? He was amateur boxer in italy, an homeland of all of those great champions, like ...uhm...wait a minute...Rocky Balboa? Franco is just about 5 feet tall, and even he is strong, he isn't fast. Faster than average, but faster than guy who have been training aikido etc. all his life? Even if Seagul is a clown, and he have done so many so bad movies, he truly have some skills in martial arts. That Franco doesn't have, so Steven has an upper hand towards him. If they fight an imaginary fight, both in their peak condition, I put my bet on Seagul.

SirTraps · « **Reply #16 on:** May 15, 2007, 11:33:43 AM »

Steven Seagall cant get his leg up higher than 28 inches off the ground due to his huge gut and fat hips. I highly doubt Steven Seagall could beat up anybody in real life. haHAHA

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #17 on:** May 15, 2007, 11:55:30 AM »

steven segal would beat the holy living dogshit out of franco.

he would keep him at bay with his long reach, finally break franco's neck with a kick, snap both his arms just out of habit, then hurl his corpse down an elevator shaft onto some electical wires where his corpse would be electrocuted.

segal movies always have the best deaths

The Ugly · « **Reply #18 on:** May 15, 2007, 12:13:58 PM »

Patrick Swayze.

&mode=related&search=

eastcoastbbman · « **Reply #19 on:** May 15, 2007, 12:32:48 PM »

Quote from: Bluto on May 15, 2007, 07:10:13 AM

Remember before you answer that Franco used to be a BOXER and he's strong as a BULL

Steven Seagal, well he need to further introduction. Guy is tough as nails.

are we talking about them NOW...or in their heyday? franco is a frail 60 year old man and steven seagal is obese. if were talking about who would win in a fight NOW....i think they would both end up in a stretcher in 30 seconds!

Bluto · « **Reply #20 on:** May 15, 2007, 12:37:34 PM »

both guys in their prime!

onlyme · « **Reply #21 on:** May 15, 2007, 01:18:04 PM »

Franco would pull off one of his huge lat spread and fly away hanging onto Seagall then let him go as he falls to his death

efirkey · « **Reply #22 on:** May 15, 2007, 03:53:24 PM »

Last time I saw Steven Seagal in a movie he wasn't looking so good and I imagine Franco is in good shape training for the Geriatric Mr Olympia so that he can beat Frank Zane just one more time baby.

dantelis · « **Reply #23 on:** May 15, 2007, 04:04:19 PM »

In his prime Franco could have beaten an in his prime Seagal. Seagal has martial arts training, but if his movies are any indication, he isn't too impressive. It's all smoke and mirrors and good editing.

americanbulldog · « **Reply #24 on:** May 16, 2007, 04:16:56 AM »

Seagull can't fight. Where is Gene LeBell when you need him.

Author Topic: Who would win a fight between Franco Columbo and Steven Seagal? (Read 5993 times)

ButtonMan