« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Better or worse?: Branch Warren  (Read 39921 times)

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19671
Better or worse?: Branch Warren
« on: May 24, 2007, 01:26:04 PM »
Is he getting better... or worse?  :-\
Logged

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2007, 01:28:45 PM »
from those pics better,
Logged

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2007, 01:29:22 PM »
the arms look better in the first shot but he looks awesome in both pics IMO.
Logged

BigSexy50

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 372
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2007, 01:29:32 PM »
Quote from: BayGBM on May 24, 2007, 01:26:04 PM
Is he getting better... or worse?  :-\

The role HGH and IGF are playing in BBing is obvious.  What you get is a much more massive BBer, but what you are sacrificing is the crispness of the physique.  Look at all these guys as they earn their pro cards, they look hard and crisp, tkae Kamali for instance, then they load up on the HGH, IGF, and other peptides in odrer to size up.

Branch looked better before.
Logged

michael arvilla

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21922
  • facebook.com/michael.arvilla
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2007, 01:30:45 PM »
Branch is much bigger/better now


Logged

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2007, 01:31:57 PM »
Quote from: michael arvilla on May 24, 2007, 01:30:45 PM
Branch is much bigger/better now



yeah with the exception of the arms i agree, he's bigger everywhere and his waist is just as small now.
Logged

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2007, 01:34:22 PM »
Quote from: Xerxes on May 24, 2007, 01:32:28 PM
He had better color and more hair. He looks like a red hot dog.


yeah but both of those are fixable, he could just grow some hair and ease up on the pro tan, the only thing i see is that his skin is thicker now.
Logged

Saxon

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1751
  • Heavy Metal Thunder
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2007, 01:35:42 PM »
He looks better with hair  :D

Physique wise, looks good in both.
Logged

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #8 on: May 24, 2007, 01:36:04 PM »
Abs and Arms are better in the first.

Chest and veins are better in the second... I guess it's a toss up.
Logged

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2007, 01:37:29 PM »
Worse. He's thicker but not immensely so and his abs are not as tight as before. He had really good shape/thickness in 99. The only thing he needed was a thicker back - nothing else. And he hasn't done that.

His back actually is in better propertion here than it is today.


Today


Looked really thick, well proportioned and awesome waist-shoulder ratio.
Logged

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7108
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2007, 01:40:10 PM »
Quote from: tu_holmes on May 24, 2007, 01:36:04 PM
Chest and veins are better in the second... I guess it's a toss up.

veins are not muscles, and should have no relevance in bodybuilding competitions
Logged
☄

BigSexy50

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 372
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2007, 01:40:20 PM »
Quote from: tu_holmes on May 24, 2007, 01:36:04 PM
Abs and Arms are better in the first.

Chest and veins are better in the second... I guess it's a toss up.

Much more detail in the older pics. Mass monsters are cool, but the drug use is out of control with some of these guys.
Logged

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #12 on: May 24, 2007, 01:46:45 PM »
to me? better today but what do i no?
Logged

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2007, 01:48:13 PM »
Quote from: bigdumbbell on May 24, 2007, 01:46:45 PM
to me? better today but what do i no?

Certainly not how to spell.
Logged

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2007, 01:48:49 PM »
Quote from: timfogarty on May 24, 2007, 01:40:10 PM
veins are not muscles, and should have no relevance in bodybuilding competitions

The Veins are a byproduct of his SOMETHING...

Whatever that IS... it makes him look more defined in that area, which is relevant to a bodybuilding competition.
Logged

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2007, 01:49:35 PM »
Quote from: timfogarty on May 24, 2007, 01:40:10 PM
veins are not muscles, and should have no relevance in bodybuilding competitions

Agreed. There are only two veins that don't look like crap: the big bicep vein and the big calf vein.
Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19671
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #16 on: May 24, 2007, 01:55:29 PM »
2001/2007
Logged

Saxon

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1751
  • Heavy Metal Thunder
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #17 on: May 24, 2007, 02:00:17 PM »
Quote from: BayGBM on May 24, 2007, 01:55:29 PM
2001/2007

He looks better in the first picture.  I think when a guy waist gets wider it really throws a physique off, even if the rest of his body gets bigger.
Logged

Victor VonDoom

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1431
  • ...and Doom shall control the world!
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #18 on: May 24, 2007, 02:00:48 PM »
Quote from: BayGBM on May 24, 2007, 01:55:29 PM
2001/2007

Notice the change in the shape of his head.  Bah!

Doom disapproves.
Logged

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Better or worse?: Branch Warren
« Reply #19 on: May 24, 2007, 02:02:19 PM »
Quote from: BayGBM on May 24, 2007, 01:55:29 PM
2001/2007

Now those photos tell a completely different story... He look SO much better in 2001.

Wow... he looks very disproportional in the 2K7 photo versus the 2K1.
Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19671
Re: Better or worse?: Branch Warren
« Reply #20 on: May 24, 2007, 02:13:32 PM »
good vs. better :-\
2007/2006
Logged

beatmaster

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2819
  • Save a tree, eat a beaver
Re: Better or worse?: Branch Warren
« Reply #21 on: May 24, 2007, 02:16:21 PM »

he's a big mofo, getting freaky!
Logged
are you delusional?

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #22 on: May 24, 2007, 02:17:10 PM »
Quote from: BayGBM on May 24, 2007, 01:55:29 PM
2001/2007

He lost biceps peak, his lats are no longer equal in size (left is larger than his right lat), his waist is wider - his proportion just isn't as good anymore.
Logged

BroadStreetBruiser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8576
  • TKU
Re: Better or worse?: Branch Warren
« Reply #23 on: May 24, 2007, 02:17:49 PM »
We went from Turbo Lover Halford to Pain Killer Halford very quickly
Logged

wordy

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 629
Re: Better or worse?
« Reply #24 on: May 24, 2007, 02:34:08 PM »
Quote from: BayGBM on May 24, 2007, 01:55:29 PM
2001/2007

Looks bigger today I'd say, especially his ears :P
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Up
« previous next »