Author Topic: New Theory re enlarged digestive apparatus  (Read 3000 times)

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
New Theory re enlarged digestive apparatus
« on: May 26, 2007, 07:17:41 AM »
Much of abdominal distension in BBers comes from enlarged digestive apparatus (stomach intestines etc.).  Consuming mass quantities during bulking phases forces the digestive machinery to adapt and it does this partially through hypertrophy.  The rest of the bulk is IAF.  If you diet for a long time pre-contest you might be able to get rid of some of the IAF, but chances are the bulk of it will remain and the digestive track will remain enlarged.  A change in life-style, i.e., 1-2 years of moderate eating habbits (i.e. slightly below maintenance calories) could be enough to bring a gut down, to a tapered waist.


The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2007, 07:19:46 AM »
maybe these IFBB pros should diet on two stalks of celery once a week on Wednesdays so they can have a 27 inch waist, 11 inch arms, 16 inch thighs and a 29 inch chest like you "shifted shapes".

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2007, 07:21:30 AM »
maybe these IFBB pros should diet on two stalks of celery once a week on Wednesdays so they can have a 27 inch waist, 11 inch arms, 16 inch thighs and a 29 inch chest like you "shifted shapes".

I'd train these "pros" but I've got my hands full trying to keep the legendary kings in line, being a MAGICAL EMPEROR isn't all it's cracked up to be.

wootwoot

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 69
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2007, 07:39:47 AM »

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2007, 07:59:42 AM »
Did you read what he said? Where did he say anything about arms chest and thighs? Just take the damn eca stack and stop whining.
hahahahahahaha, keep making excuses for being skinny.

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2007, 08:03:06 AM »
Im not making excuses, one day ill be bigger and better. But no fucking way will I be in constant bulking mode like you. Thats why you get so defensive everytime someone mentions small waists. Damn.
hahahahaha, yeah i know, one day you''' bulk your arms from their current 12 inches to 23, your thighs from their current 18 inches to 36 all while keeping your waist at 26, hahahaah epic delusions.

noc

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1429
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2007, 08:03:53 AM »
hahahahahahaha, keep making excuses for being skinny.

whats your excuse for being the michelin mans stunt double?


The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2007, 08:05:27 AM »
whats your excuse for being the michelin mans stunt double?


hahahaha, at least Xerxes had the balls to post a picture as skinny as he is, you're far too much of a pusssy to do the same.

Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2007, 08:07:16 AM »
Yeah, this is why Lance Armestrong and other cyclists have such a hug gut  ::) ::) ::), consuming 8000 cals for the Tour and during heavy training. Get over it, it is the drugs, the and internal fat accumulations in the gut due to GH and Insulin and some growth of intestines and internal organs due to IGF.

However I would agree that carb loading will bloat you, pulling extra fluids into the digestive tract as well.

Lance eats alot of fish, protein and fats during and after races so cyclist at that level don't exactly carb load like a bodybuilder getting ready for stage.

noc

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1429
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2007, 08:09:56 AM »
hahahaha, at least Xerxes had the balls to post a picture as skinny as he is, you're far too much of a pusssy to do the same.

hahaha oh brother  ::) maybe i will once ive racked up over 20,000 posts with two accounts hahaha i might even get called out by alex to post up then deny the photos are me  ;D

how is HBK doing anyway?

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2007, 08:10:31 AM »
Whatever. Anyway that would look retarded on a 5'8" frame. 17 inch arms, 26inch legs and ripped abs, thats my goal.
why do you think that would look retarded? this is GETBIG.COM right?

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2007, 08:11:25 AM »
hahaha oh brother  ::) maybe i will once ive racked up over 20,000 posts with two accounts hahaha i might even get called out by alex to post up then deny the photos are me  ;D

how is HBK doing anyway?
hahahahaha, brutal avoiding the subject by talking about something else. ;D

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2007, 08:13:48 AM »
Yes, it is getbig, not getdisgusting.
hahahahaha, some of you guys make me laugh at your delusions, you make it sound as if you can gain weight and all of it will go to yoru arms, legs, shoulders, chest and back and none at all will go to your waist, hahahaha.

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2007, 08:16:50 AM »
Sure it will be a little bigger but its not like your training your obliques all day. They wont be much bigger. The rest of the bodyparts will be bigger.
why wouldn't you want to be 260 pounds at 5'8" in reasonably good shape?

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2007, 08:21:33 AM »
Maybe it is because you dont realize how small your waist is under that layer of fat. Once you diet down you will realize that your waist didnt grow much (maybe even got smaller if you started as a fat kid).
these are the words of a guy who has never squatted or deadlifted heavy in his life obviously, once you get your weights in those movements up over 500 pounds each for reps let's see if your waist is still 27 inches or whatever it is.

noc

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1429
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #15 on: May 26, 2007, 08:22:42 AM »
hahahahaha, brutal avoiding the subject by talking about something else. ;D

i was talking about this



the other guy looks better than you and you've done cycles  ::)

worse than billyguns hahahahah

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #16 on: May 26, 2007, 08:25:16 AM »
i was talking about this



the other guy looks better than you and you've done cycles  ::)

worse than billyguns hahahahah
hahaha, that's not me, it just shows how desperate you are to post a picture of someone who isn't me.

noc

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1429
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #17 on: May 26, 2007, 08:27:22 AM »
hahaha, that's not me, it just shows how desperate you are to post a picture of someone who isn't me.

hahahahhaha of course it isnt  ::) 

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #18 on: May 26, 2007, 08:28:26 AM »
Yeah, this is why Lance Armestrong and other cyclists have such a hug gut  ::) ::) ::), consuming 8000 cals for the Tour and during heavy training. Get over it, it is the drugs, the and internal fat accumulations in the gut due to GH and Insulin and some growth of intestines and internal organs due to IGF.

However I would agree that carb loading will bloat you, pulling extra fluids into the digestive tract as well.

Lance eats alot of fish, protein and fats during and after races so cyclist at that level don't exactly carb load like a bodybuilder getting ready for stage.

lance armstrong is a good counterpoint...but id like to know how much these guys are really eating.   No way they eat 8000 cals durring the tour, also as we know they are ALL DRUGS as well

Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #19 on: May 26, 2007, 08:38:29 AM »
lance armstrong is a good counterpoint...but id like to know how much these guys are really eating.   No way they eat 8000 cals durring the tour, also as we know they are ALL DRUGS as well

Lots of fats, they are eating while riding. Lance has cheese sandwiches while on the bike for example. Just lots of regular high density food. I read lots of fast carbs don't really work that well for long time endurance, it's mainly fats and protein and carbs that are evenly distributed, I doubt they want insulin spikes.

But to each his own, so some bodybuilders have a gut, doesn't seam to hamper their placings to much...

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #20 on: May 26, 2007, 09:00:17 AM »
Lots of fats, they are eating while riding. Lance has cheese sandwiches while on the bike for example. Just lots of regular high density food. I read lots of fast carbs don't really work that well for long time endurance, it's mainly fats and protein and carbs that are evenly distributed, I doubt they want insulin spikes.

But to each his own, so some bodybuilders have a gut, doesn't seam to hamper their placings to much...

well they are eating nutrient dense foods, that would require less digestive apparatus.  On the other hand cows eat massive quantities of nutrient impoverished grass so they need a big digestive machine to cull the quality sustenance.

I have a feeling that bulking bodybuilders are closer to cows then lance in terms of their food's nutrient density.  Perhaps thats why BBers guts tend towards the bovine

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #21 on: May 26, 2007, 09:24:09 AM »
well they are eating nutrient dense foods, that would require less digestive apparatus.  On the other hand cows eat massive quantities of nutrient impoverished grass so they need a big digestive machine to cull the quality sustenance.

I have a feeling that bulking bodybuilders are closer to cows then lance in terms of their food's nutrient density.  Perhaps thats why BBers guts tend towards the bovine

many pro bbers from the seventies would gorge themselves on massive amounts of food off-season to bulk up, then lean down for a comp with a trim waist.

hell, serge nubret would eat 6lbs of meat in one meal, but had a very small waist.

oliva, buchanan, etc same.

of course, todays bbers have a shit load more muscle on their bodies and, whether people understand this or not, when you lift heavy ass weights (ronnieism) in rows, deads, squats, etc you are going to develop some thick abs, obliques, erectors, etc.

i don't know exactly what's causing it but i don't buy the bulking theory at all. too much evidence to refute it.

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #22 on: May 26, 2007, 09:30:49 AM »
hell, serge nubret would eat 6lbs of meat in one meal, but had a very small waist.

MAYBE he did that for one meal, but in general he ate very moderately compared to today's bodybuilders.  I have heard he tended to eat just one filling meal a day.

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #23 on: May 26, 2007, 09:43:27 AM »
MAYBE he did that for one meal, but in general he ate very moderately compared to today's bodybuilders.  I have heard he tended to eat just one filling meal a day.

1. you're ignoring the rest of my points.

2. my point about serge was that to eat all his calories in one massive meal would seemingly insure your theory of expanded digestive tissue.

yet he had one of the tightest and smallest waists of all time.

SteelePegasus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7829
  • Life, death, in between is getbig.com
Re: NEW THEORY
« Reply #24 on: May 26, 2007, 09:43:36 AM »
but isn't the digestive system elastic in that it adjust based on the quantity of food?

so yes, it would expand during the said buiking phase, but would quickly shrink in the diet/cutting phase
Here comes the money shot