DILLET vs DORIAN

[local hero]

Dorian looked awefull onstage, he couldn't pose to save his life

props to the photographer who were able to take those pictures with the 1 or 2 second he was actually hitting the pose !

dorians main strength was his ability to show his physique off to the full,,,, he hit every manditory 100%, he was no swan lake but what he did was very effective....ive got no idea where u came to that conclusion!

[Hulkster]

There is no contest...
dorian had a better nack..
paul seriosuly owned him EVERYWHERE ELSE..
if my olympia want jusdged so much on back dorian would barely make top 10...

agreed.

and what is really sad, is that same thing applies to a lot of top guys dorian competed against:

 

the judging was really not great..

[IceCold]

agreed.

and what is really sad, is that same thing applies to a lot of top guys dorian competed against:

 

the judging was really not great..

the list of excuses goes on and on.......

[Hulkster]

why is it an excuse?

the pics validate that the judging sucked. there is no excuse. it is fact that is obvious to all of us except you, pubes and suckmyasshole.

apparently, many on getbig agree with us.

look at the comments on this thread, and the topic in the first place. lol

[IceCold]

why is it an excuse?

the pics validate that the judging sucked. there is no excuse. it is fact that is obvious to all of us except you, pubes and suckmyasshole.

apparently, many on getbig agree with us.

look at the comments on this thread, and the topic in the first place. lol

its really based on just 1 pose.

1 pose.

watch a video and then you'll see why yates won.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teq_cqDOJ_s&mode=related&search=/


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kg7hAPdnl8s

[Zugzwang]

Those Gary Phillips' pictures at the start of the thread look photoshopped; nobody in them looks like they're even there, like they've been pasted on top.

Either way, does it matter? Yates is a six-time Mr O. Dillet is 'famous' for freezing on stage. That's it.

[Hulkster]

its really based on just 1 pose.

1 pose.

]

yes, a pose that shows the arms, delts chest quads...pretty much the whole front side of the body..

but its just one pose..

and besides, its not one pose. Dorian was owned from the front in many other poses besides the most muscular..

[nder98]

Dillet showing his son Yates the BB ropes..

He looks like Frankenstein

[nder98]

agreed.

and what is really sad, is that same thing applies to a lot of top guys dorian competed against:

 

the judging was really not great..

Levrone smoking everone in this shot...

[pumpster]

Levrone smoking everone in this shot...

There are a few guys that in fair shows would've kicked his ass.

[pobrecito]

Is anyone else getting sick of Pumpster regurgitation of the same slanted pictures over and over again 

[The_Hammer]

Damn Dorian looks incredible in that shot.  I thought '94 was his worst year?  Was that taken before the bicep tear?

[Hulkster]

Damn Dorian looks incredible in that shot.  I thought '94 was his worst year?  Was that taken before the bicep tear?

it was his worst year. at the GP show, he has almost no visible cuts or definition in his arms or entire lower body, from the front or the back.

he had good abs at the GP show, and thats it. and of course, the tear..

[The_Hammer]

it was his worst year. at the GP show, he has almost no visible cuts or definition in his arms or entire lower body, from the front or the back.

he had good abs at the GP show, and thats it. and of course, the tear..

I'm sorry but now you're just making things up.  No "visible cuts or definition"?  You may want to get your eyes checked.

[Hulkster]

I'm sorry but now you're just making things up.  No "visible cuts or definition"?  You may want to get your eyes checked.

tell me where you see any definition on his arms, quads, glutes or hams:

[Hulkster]

even his back has nowhere near the detail it normally did.

there is some detail in his delts, and his chest and abs are cut.

but nowhere else. not having cut quads or arms is a pretty major flaw.

[pobrecito]

I'm not sure what you are smoking hulkster, but Dorian looks outstanding in those shots.

[pobrecito]

Damn Dorian looks incredible in that shot.  I thought '94 was his worst year?  Was that taken before the bicep tear?

Dorian wasn't at his personal best in 94, but he was still more than good enough to win. Nobody has even come close to this from the rear, Coleman looks like a mismatched lego set in comparison.

[The_Hammer]

I am a fan of both Ronnie and Dorian, but I will agree that Dorian's back has more balance than Ronnie's and looks better.  Everything else other than conditoning, forearms, and calves go to Ronnie of yesteryear. 

Neither have a good chest and their negatives in that department weigh the same so it's a tie there.

[mesmorph78]

coleman is my fav bb...
but not because he is my fav bber.. means i will sit here and say he has a great midsection.... or calves.. or will i say he was more ballanced than shawn... or flex...
dorian yates has a terrible build....
0 balance...
and whats more only 1 great bodypart...
...
which was his back its simple arithmetic..
1 great body part...
vs someone with 6...
i dont care if they gave dorian yates 15 sandows... in 90% of the pics posted ted on this thread he is gettin owned....
he olnly looks good from the back?
front double bi.. ssucks...
most muscular crap
front lat spread thas ok,... once again due to his..... (wait for it)....... back...
dide tri.. only good in the famous black and white shot.. good nontheless..
when he turns around to the back the great.. his back is great...
...
he may as well just walked backward out on the stage....

.. its simple if the mr o wasnt juded on the back....
noone would be talking about yates right now....
if it was judged FAIRLY.. taking all bodyparts... arms chest delts abs.. etc...
would yates have one even one sandow???
(thats is a rhetorical question by the way)
 
 

[Hulkster]

coleman is my fav bb...
but not because he is my fav bber.. means i will sit here and say he has a great midsection.... or calves.. or will i say he was more ballanced than shawn... or flex...
dorian yates has a terrible build....
0 balance...
and whats more only 1 great bodypart...
...
which was his back its simple arithmetic..
1 great body part...
vs someone with 6...
i dont care if they gave dorian yates 15 sandows... in 90% of the pics posted ted on this thread he is gettin owned....he olnly looks good from the back?
front double bi.. ssucks...
most muscular crap
front lat spread thas ok,... once again due to his..... (wait for it)....... back...
dide tri.. only good in the famous black and white shot.. good nontheless..
when he turns around to the back the great.. his back is great...
...
he may as well just walked backward out on the stage....

.. its simple if the mr o wasnt juded on the back....
noone would be talking about yates right now....
if it was judged FAIRLY.. taking all bodyparts... arms chest delts abs.. etc...
would yates have one even one sandow???(thats is a rhetorical question by the way)
 
 

read it carefully nuthuggers hahahaha

excellent post! agree totally.  apprently so does most of getbig except for one or two morons

[pumpster]

I'm not sure what you are smoking hulkster, but Dorian looks outstanding in those shots.

Then again pubes thinks Warren Branch looks outstanding too.

[pumpster]

coleman is my fav bb...
but not because he is my fav bber.. means i will sit here and say he has a great midsection.... or calves.. or will i say he was more ballanced than shawn... or flex...
dorian yates has a terrible build....
0 balance...
and whats more only 1 great bodypart...
...
which was his back its simple arithmetic..
1 great body part...
vs someone with 6...
i dont care if they gave dorian yates 15 sandows... in 90% of the pics posted ted on this thread he is gettin owned....
he olnly looks good from the back?
front double bi.. ssucks...
most muscular crap
front lat spread thas ok,... once again due to his..... (wait for it)....... back...
dide tri.. only good in the famous black and white shot.. good nontheless..
when he turns around to the back the great.. his back is great...
...
he may as well just walked backward out on the stage....

.. its simple if the mr o wasnt juded on the back....
noone would be talking about yates right now....
if it was judged FAIRLY.. taking all bodyparts... arms chest delts abs.. etc...
would yates have one even one sandow???
(thats is a rhetorical question by the way)
 
 

Agreed, Yates had only one great area, back. I'm not going to make some idiotic pubes commment to the effect that the back didn't stack up to Coleman's, i've always said it was comparable in different ways.

It's the rest of Yates that was a mess.

[IceCold]

read it carefully nuthuggers hahahaha

excellent post! agree totally.  apprently so does most of getbig except for one or two morons

1 person agrees with you, meso, and you think its everyone.

notice the # of people saying how retarted you are for your comments.

hammer, local hero, zugzwang, camel jockey, phyyxsius, etc.

look at the # of people who owned you.

[IceCold]

Agreed, Yates had only one great area, back. I'm not going to make some idiotic pubes commment to the effect that the back didn't stack up to Coleman's, i've always said it was comparable in different ways.

It's the rest of Yates that was a mess.

wrong as usual