Author Topic: pre synthol arms  (Read 56320 times)

funk51

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39664
  • Getbig!
pre synthol arms
« on: June 06, 2007, 07:03:11 AM »
two non synthol old age bbers
F

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2007, 07:30:48 AM »
Thats an impressive arm. Especially for 57 yrs ago.

funk51

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39664
  • Getbig!
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2007, 11:50:52 AM »
several more
F

chris2489

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 157
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2007, 09:13:45 PM »
Freddy ortiz arms are amazing, especially for the 1960's



pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2007, 10:42:27 PM »
Ortiz isn't remembered much but looked great.

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2007, 12:21:06 AM »
Ortiz had massive, perfect arms. Great pics.

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2007, 06:53:34 AM »
Ortiz had massive, perfect arms. Great pics.

true, they were outrageous, especially for the time.

the arm at top of thread looks unbelievable for 1950 :o

over 20". gh15 has stated many times that guys were using test from the 1940's - and when i see an arm like that in 1950! well, you've got to wonder. :-\


funk51

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39664
  • Getbig!
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2007, 07:50:27 AM »
several more
F

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2007, 09:46:25 AM »
Wow Funk51!

Where did you find that Beckles pic?

I never knew he was ever young ;D

When is that from?

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2007, 09:51:22 AM »
true, they were outrageous, especially for the time.

the arm at top of thread looks unbelievable for 1950 :o

over 20". gh15 has stated many times that guys were using test from the 1940's - and when i see an arm like that in 1950! well, you've got to wonder. :-\



For sure.

funk51

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39664
  • Getbig!
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2007, 07:07:35 AM »
beckles pic is probably from the mid 60's when he was in the mr britain contest. scott's around 65 66 when he was mr o. couple more pics to ponder.
F

BEAST 8692

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2007, 07:47:16 AM »
rick wayne circa 1980's

dave draper circa 1960's

chris2489

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 157
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2007, 11:56:58 AM »
true, they were outrageous, especially for the time.

the arm at top of thread looks unbelievable for 1950 :o

over 20". gh15 has stated many times that guys were using test from the 1940's - and when i see an arm like that in 1950! well, you've got to wonder. :-\



Ortiz was asked how much protein do you take and he was quoted saying "Who needs protein when you have dianabol".

Check out this pic, probably one of the first guys to have a split in his bicep.


pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2007, 03:53:55 PM »
rick wayne circa 1980's



Wayne from late 60s, early 70s. After that he really wasn't in shape.

funk51

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39664
  • Getbig!
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2007, 08:22:32 AM »
and more
F

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #15 on: June 10, 2007, 09:44:30 AM »
That shot's a reminder that Coe had one of the best pairs of arms in the world early-70s.

beatmaster

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2819
  • Save a tree, eat a beaver
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #16 on: June 10, 2007, 09:51:57 AM »

no synthol..............

roids, yesss.........

but, i have to give it to them, they had nice arms, drugs or not!
are you delusional?

funk51

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39664
  • Getbig!
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2007, 07:42:08 AM »
more
F

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2007, 09:30:20 AM »
Very impressive tris!

funk51

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39664
  • Getbig!
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #19 on: June 12, 2007, 10:27:54 AM »
more
F

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #20 on: June 12, 2007, 10:32:18 AM »
Pearl was great.

Why was Grimek such a star, was he being promoted by someone? I mean, did he have backing from a magazine, or sponsor/s, he was very well built, but there were other physiques on par in the era.

funk51

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39664
  • Getbig!
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #21 on: June 12, 2007, 12:27:54 PM »
grimek predates pearl by 15 to 20 years. john grimek was being pushed by hoffman and the strength and health mags, when hoffman started up muscular developent mag in early 60's grimek was the first editor.
F

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #22 on: June 12, 2007, 01:57:23 PM »
So Grimek was around in Reeves' day?

funk51

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39664
  • Getbig!
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #23 on: June 14, 2007, 12:45:09 PM »
figo,grimek was born in 1910, reeves 1926, pearl 1930. only pearl is still alive.
F

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: pre synthol arms
« Reply #24 on: June 14, 2007, 04:57:06 PM »
Trying to establish why he was so "big", but I suppose he was best of his time.

Had no idea Perl was that age. Great long career. Aged well.