Author Topic: Back detail (Read 3607 times)

LatsMcGee · « **Reply #25 on:** June 13, 2007, 02:48:52 AM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 12, 2007, 02:41:56 PM

Personally, I don't think anyone matched Yates on lats for one reason - he trained using the orignal Nautilus Pullover machine that gave him massively thick lats

The pullovers gave him the awesome width. All that rowing is what makes a back really thick.

tommywishbone · « **Reply #26 on:** June 13, 2007, 03:02:20 AM »

Quote from: Figo on June 12, 2007, 11:00:59 AM

This was the trend-setting back.

No-one had a back like this before. Just like Bannout did in 83.

Damn.

MikeThaMachine · « **Reply #27 on:** June 13, 2007, 03:07:58 AM »

Bluto · « **Reply #28 on:** June 13, 2007, 03:09:05 AM »

all genetics

tommywishbone · « **Reply #29 on:** June 13, 2007, 03:13:14 AM »

Quote from: MikeThaMachine on June 13, 2007, 03:07:58 AM

Names?...

MikeThaMachine · « **Reply #30 on:** June 13, 2007, 03:16:42 AM »

Quote from: tommywishbone on June 13, 2007, 03:13:14 AM

Names?...

HAHAHAHAHA funny, if you don't know who they are then please stop following BBing...

For the morons out there from left to right it's Chris Cormier, Ronnie Coleman and Kevin Levrone (but Kev's back sux so don't pay attention to him).

SteelePegasus · « **Reply #31 on:** June 13, 2007, 04:41:27 AM »

Quote from: MikeThaMachine on June 13, 2007, 03:16:42 AM

HAHAHAHAHA funny, if you don't know who they are then please stop following BBing...

For the morons out there from left to right it's Chris Cormier, Ronnie Coleman and Kevin Levrone (but Kev's back sux so don't pay attention to him).

yep, he is getting seriously outclassed in those pics

MikeThaMachine · « **Reply #32 on:** June 13, 2007, 04:57:37 AM »

Quote from: SteelePegasus on June 13, 2007, 04:41:27 AM

yep, he is getting seriously outclassed in those pics

Funny thing is he got 2nd while Cormier got 3rd

phyxsius · « **Reply #33 on:** June 13, 2007, 05:35:15 AM »

Quote from: MikeThaMachine on June 13, 2007, 04:57:37 AM

Funny thing is he got 2nd while Cormier got 3rd

because Kevin blown Chris away on the front shot (don't look at the quads)

BEAST 8692 · « **Reply #34 on:** June 13, 2007, 05:53:46 AM »

Quote from: phyxsius on June 13, 2007, 05:35:15 AM

because Kevin blown Chris away on the front shot (don't look at the quads)

levrone on condition, dryness, hammy, glute, quads, delts, tris,...no, 3rd was correct.

couple of those haney pics were very obviously shopped wider, didn't really analyse the others. flex under heavy load (can't carry 400lbs with you on the stage), but a good pic. beckles - wtf? now that's what i call shredded detail. yates had the best combination of 3d density and thickness, size and width, dry, grainy, conditioned and comprehensive development from neck to waist in the back.

all good pics.