Author Topic: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?  (Read 96919 times)

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #225 on: December 05, 2010, 07:35:43 AM »

depends what picture.  there not amazing but they're not like bob chick or something. they're up to par

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #226 on: December 05, 2010, 07:39:28 AM »

depends what picture.  there not amazing but they're not like bob chick or something. they're up to par
damn memories...i remember when i first got into bbing nasser was all over the mags...i was actually reading old flex issues, pre 2000...good times and great motivation.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #227 on: December 05, 2010, 07:39:34 AM »
Not this guy

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #228 on: December 05, 2010, 08:10:53 AM »

depends what picture.  there not amazing but they're not like bob chick or something. they're up to par

They SUCK  and they're not in proportion with the rest of his arms

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #229 on: December 05, 2010, 08:19:39 AM »
And BTW Ronnie has to have the biggest arms of all-time


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #230 on: December 05, 2010, 08:22:28 AM »
 :o

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #231 on: December 05, 2010, 08:26:27 AM »
 ;)

clued-up

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4374
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #232 on: December 05, 2010, 08:31:01 AM »
Big is overrated.

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #233 on: December 05, 2010, 08:34:35 AM »
And seeing you put that into quotations I challenge you to find where I typed that and good luck dumbass you'll need it.  ;)



You've said they're sub par hundreds of times, you know it, I know it. Shut up.

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #234 on: December 05, 2010, 08:37:19 AM »
Bullshit at least have some balls and man up troll and ironically who did Hulkster the moron claim said it? me and he was responding to who? you , so please spare us the ' I wasn't talking about you ' nonsense it makes you look even more dumb

either way the point stands his forearms aren't in proportion with his oversized biceps/triceps

If his triceps are "oversized" how can they be sub par, as you have also claimed throughout the truth thread you've now pussied out of?

Flexb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2975
  • word
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #235 on: December 05, 2010, 08:52:15 AM »
Not this guy


HAHA, this guy is somethin else. I don't want to knock him, he gets in condition and has a decent structure, just the worst biceps in professional bodybuilding history

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #236 on: December 05, 2010, 08:57:58 AM »
the bis might look alright if the tris were existent! The overall effect is zero arms!

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #237 on: December 05, 2010, 09:01:17 AM »
You've said they're sub par hundreds of times, you know it, I know it. Shut up.

Like I said no coincidence most Coleman fans are complete idiots , show me where I ever typed the word small they are sub-par in relation to his biceps & triceps absolutely in the context of a balance arms that shows great proportion , they're shaped like bowling pins analogous to having high calves , his forearms ( and ironically the lateral head of his triceps ) are shaped like Al Beckles 

so I never claimed his forearms were small pat attention to what the claim is.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #238 on: December 05, 2010, 09:05:33 AM »
If his triceps are "oversized" how can they be sub par, as you have also claimed throughout the truth thread you've now pussied out of?

how can they be sub-par? you think just because they're oversized for his forearms it doesn't mean they can't be lacking? you can't possibly be serious? just take a look at his side triceps pose and you'll see what sub-par means  ;) oh and by the way they are oversized ( especially in relation to his forearms which is what oversized mean or if you wanna play word games his forearms are undersized )

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #239 on: December 05, 2010, 09:13:15 AM »
The same could be said of Arnold. Doesn't detract from how great the overall effect of his arms was. Sergio had the better tris and forearms, but not only would most people say Arnold's were better but he proved onstage many times that tris plus forearms gets beat by overall more shaped and defined arms.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #240 on: December 05, 2010, 09:17:34 AM »
The same could be said of Arnold. Doesn't detract from how great the overall effect of his arms was. Sergio had the better tris and forearms, but not only would most people say Arnold's were better but he proved onstage many times that tris plus forearms gets beat by overall more shaped and defined arms.

Same can absolutely be said about Arnold and I've said it many times. and like I was originally saying his forearms are not in proportion with his biceps & triceps which is obvious but some fanboys can't even get that straight and lie and claim I said they were ' small ' his forearms are obviously huge just not as huge and in proportion with his biceps and triceps.


Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #241 on: December 05, 2010, 09:34:29 AM »
Arnold was arguably the best ever, him and Ronnie top many best arm lists. Maybe their proprtions are desirable? Mattarazzo was the same. Dorian isn't on any such list. A picture from Ronnie's umpteenth Olympia win aged 43 doesn't prove anything more than any of Rocketswitch's inanely turd posts. As you often point out every visible bodypart is judged in every pose, so Ronnie's tris might not look the best in the side tri some years, but the long inner head looks exceptional in many poses, and there are several pics of the outer head looking good in the side tri too some years. I won't post them because I know you know they exist, although I may if you play dumb and lie outright like you did about the '99 decent calves pics.

Flexb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2975
  • word
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #242 on: December 05, 2010, 09:40:23 AM »
Best biceps probably have to go to Arnold, full mountain-like peak. Ronnie's were up there also but I liked the way arnolds looked better. Vince Taylor had awesome biceps also.




NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #243 on: December 05, 2010, 09:48:41 AM »
Arnold was arguably the best ever, him and Ronnie top many best arm lists. Maybe their proprtions are desirable? Mattarazzo was the same. Dorian isn't on any such list. A picture from Ronnie's umpteenth Olympia win aged 43 doesn't prove anything more than any of Rocketswitch's inanely turd posts. As you often point out every visible bodypart is judged in every pose, so Ronnie's tris might not look the best in the side tri some years, but the long inner head looks exceptional in many poses, and there are several pics of the outer head looking good in the side tri too some years. I won't post them because I know you know they exist, although I may if you play dumb and lie outright like you did about the '99 decent calves pics.

Who mentioned anything about Dorian? who? please spare us in a lame attempt at turning this into something else , and funny you wanna mention lists Flex magazine's list of best parts of the century doesn't mention Ronnie it has Arnold as best biceps? I've seen another list that put Darrem above Ronnie in biceps so not everyone has Ronnie at the top of the list

And the picture of Ronnie at 43 doesn't mean anything? yet I've seen many , many Ronnie fanboys post pictures from that very contest in best arm threads so I disagree it doesn't mean anything and yes Ronnie's triceps do look good in other poses and I'm glad you mentioned every part gets judged just like his lackluster forearms do , just because you're willing to overlook them doesn't mean the judges would


lie about his calves in 1999? are you kidding me? his calves SUCK any year but idiots like you don't care because they are ' big '  ::) his calves in 99 really suck too try sticking to the topic BTW  ;)

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #244 on: December 05, 2010, 09:53:15 AM »
Whose arms are lacklustre?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #245 on: December 05, 2010, 09:57:10 AM »
Whose arms are lacklustre?

Ronnie's forearms in relation to his biceps/triceps like his lackluster calves in relation to his oversized quads it's all about balance & proportion

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #246 on: December 05, 2010, 10:00:55 AM »
Who mentioned anything about Dorian? who? please spare us in a lame attempt at turning this into something else , and funny you wanna mention lists Flex magazine's list of best parts of the century doesn't mention Ronnie it has Arnold as best biceps? I've seen another list that put Darrem above Ronnie in biceps so not everyone has Ronnie at the top of the list

And the picture of Ronnie at 43 doesn't mean anything? yet I've seen many , many Ronnie fanboys post pictures from that very contest in best arm threads so I disagree it doesn't mean anything and yes Ronnie's triceps do look good in other poses and I'm glad you mentioned every part gets judged just like his lackluster forearms do , just because you're willing to overlook them doesn't mean the judges would


lie about his calves in 1999? are you kidding me? his calves SUCK any year but idiots like you don't care because they are ' big '  ::) his calves in 99 really suck too try sticking to the topic BTW  ;)

The point with the Dorian reference and the calves reference is that you talk tripe. You have attempted to prove in the past that Dorian's were better, so your opinion is based on coming across as annoying rather than being objective. That's the relevance.

Ronnie's forearms are great, just not the best on earth ever. Darrem Charles possibly does have even better biceps than Ronnie, what's your point?

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #247 on: December 05, 2010, 10:02:01 AM »
Ronnie's forearms in relation to his biceps/triceps like his lackluster calves in relation to his oversized quads it's all about balance & proportion

Ah that pic, would it be hard to find bad pics of almost anyone, especially possibly the most photographed bodybuilder ever?!

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #248 on: December 05, 2010, 10:09:59 AM »
The point with the Dorian reference and the calves reference is that you talk tripe. You have attempted to prove in the past that Dorian's were better, so your opinion is based on coming across as annoying rather than being objective. That's the relevance.

Ronnie's forearms are great, just not the best on earth ever. Darrem Charles possibly does have even better biceps than Ronnie, what's your point?

Quote
The point with the Dorian reference and the calves reference is that you talk tripe. You have attempted to prove in the past that Dorian's were better, so your opinion is based on coming across as annoying rather than being objective. That's the relevance.

No I didn't another moron Coleman fan with the reading comprehension of 1 year old , I said the balance between all of his arms muscles were better you dolt ! you can't even get the story straight , you , Hulkster and Nirvana all can't follow the story it's no coincidence.

Quote
Ronnie's forearms are great, just not the best on earth ever. Darrem Charles possibly does have even better biceps than Ronnie, what's your point?

No they're not great please don't ever type I can't be objective again with this nonsense and the lie his calves were good or even decent  ::) his forearms aren't great , they're big the shape sucks ( shaped like a bowling pin anomalous to having high calves ) they don't mate-up with his biceps and triceps so please go learn what great is oh and BTW

Peter McGough Ironage Oct 13 , 2007

Who had the best forearms you ever seen : Best forearms I have seen with my own peepers. not in order: Kaz, Dorian Yates, Gunnar Rosbo, Lee Priest, Phil Heath, Armin Shultz, Flex Lewis.


no Ronnie gee I wonder why  ::)

Quote
Ah that pic, would it be hard to find bad pics of almost anyone, especially possibly the most photographed bodybuilder ever?!

It's not a bad pic it just shows how shitty his forearms were in the grand scheme of things , nothing new



 


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83280
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which Pros Arms Were the Biggest?
« Reply #249 on: December 05, 2010, 10:11:22 AM »
Amazing biceps , not so amazing forearms